Anchored in notions of place and identity, the HSRC marks a novel entry point into social research on geoengineering, which enables a more situated engagement
with ocean fertilization, in keeping with geographical traditions.
Not exact matches
asks Russ George, chief scientist of the expedition as well as a controversial businessman
with a history of attempting to start CO2 - removal schemes ranging from reforestation to
ocean fertilization.
During her half - hour of interaction
with the class, McNutt said, students asked questions ranging from the feasibility of the OTEC, or
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion — a strategy for harvesting energy from the oceans — to whether deforestation in Africa «might actually have a silver lining if it leads to ocean iron fertilization.&r
Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion — a strategy for harvesting energy from the
oceans — to whether deforestation in Africa «might actually have a silver lining if it leads to
ocean iron fertilization.&r
ocean iron
fertilization.»
With Leinen as its chief scientific officer, Climos sought to perform
ocean iron
fertilization experiments and sell carbon credits it could show it earned.
These issues are particularly acute
with commercial
ocean fertilization.
In that project, US entrepreneur Russ George convinced a Haida Nation village to pursue iron
fertilization to boost salmon populations,
with the potential to sell carbon credits based on the amount of CO2 that would be sequestered in the
ocean.
What are your views on experiments testing whether
fertilization of mineral - starved regions of the
oceans with iron could serve to pull carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere?
Of course a small amount of
ocean fertilization will not hurt, but the problem comes
with any over-
fertilization of the
ocean.
«
Ocean fertilization»
with highly toxic materials is another deadly aspect of geoengineering.
Andrew Parker of the Belfer Center at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government told the New York Times that George's actions had apparently violated an international convention on
ocean dumping and a U.N. convention on
ocean fertilization for geoengineering purposes, along
with a set of voluntary principles on geoengineering developed at Oxford.
As researchers concluded in a new study published in Geophysical Research Letters,
ocean iron
fertilization can only prove successful as a climate geoengineering approach if, in addition to phytoplankton bloom stimulation, «a proportion of the particulate organic carbon (POC) produced must sink down the water column and reach the main thermocline or deeper before being remineralized... and the third phase is long - term sequestration of the carbon at depth out of contact
with the atmosphere.»
This paper considers the practicalities, opportunities and threats associated
with one of the earliest proposed carbon - removal techniques: large - scale
ocean fertilization, achieved by adding iron or other nutrients to surface waters.
The study said the giant icebergs had an outsized impact in promoting
ocean fertilization when compared
with small icebergs.
Kim Stanley Robinson's wildly successful 1993 science fiction trilogy about geo - engineering and terraforming, Red Mars, Green Mars, Blue Mars, describes «the
fertilization of the Antarctic
Ocean with iron dust, which was to act as a dietary supplement to phytoplankton» as a cure for both global warming and dying coral reefs.
In that project, US entrepreneur Russ George convinced a Haida Nation village to pursue iron
fertilization to boost salmon populations,
with the potential to sell carbon credits based on the amount of CO2 that would be sequestered in the
ocean.
The 2012 iron
fertilization generated an algae bloom that fed salmon at the right time to boost the salmon population * the salmon bloom died in days and then fell to the bottom of the
ocean taking large amounts of CO2
with them
Together
with commercial operators they plan to go ahead
with large - scale and more permanent
ocean fertilization experiments and note that potential negative environmental consequences must be balanced against the harm
The Planet Remade covers all the main proposed geoengineering techniques --(not just SAI, but also
ocean iron
fertilization (OIF), marine cloud brightening (MCB), bioenergy
with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) and direct air capture (DAC)-RRB-, outlining their history, the current state of knowledge, and expected risks and benefits (and impressively, without descending into the alphabet soup of all these acronyms).
This is how the model deals
with iron
fertilization strength in the Southern Ocean (SO; see Dust Radiative and Iron Fertilizati
fertilization strength in the Southern
Ocean (SO; see Dust Radiative and Iron
FertilizationFertilization Forcings).
Therefore it's my opinion that the not - so - extreme decline from April to July 2010, coupled
with the higher - than - usual April value, coupled
with the changes (both trend and fluctuation) in both the size of and the timing of the annual cycle, are such that there's insufficient evidence to conclude that the Eyjafjallajökull eruption caused a noticeable change in atmospheric CO2, whether by emissions from the eruption, the lack of emissions from air traffic, or iron
fertilization of the
oceans.
Those CDR techniques
with the least potential: Biochar («significant doubts» about scope, effectiveness and safety - «substantial research» required to prove effectiveness) and
ocean iron
fertilization (not proven to be effective and «high potential for unintended and undesirable ecological side effects»).