Significant changes in ice cover and the moisture balance were seen, consistent with the feedbacks believed to be associated
with ocean heat transport changes.
Not exact matches
They looked at how different planetary rotation rates would impact
heat transport with the presence of
oceans taken into account.
At the same time, increasing depth and duration of drought, along
with warmer temperatures enabling the spread of pine beetles has increased the flammability of this forest region — http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v1/n9/full/nclimate1293.html http://www.vancouversun.com/fires+through+tinder+pine+beetle+killed+forests/10047293/story.html Can climate models give different TCR and ECS
with different timing / extent of when or how much boreal forest burns, and how the soot generated alters the date of an ice free Arctic
Ocean or the rate of Greenland ice melt and its influence on long term dynamics of the AMOC
transport of
heat?
That is indeed largely the
ocean heat transport associated
with the THC, in lay - persons terminology often referred to as the Gulf Stream.
By analogy, a warmer world wouldn't be rainier (or cloudier); it's an imperfect analogy, because rain isn't absolutely correlated
with cloudiness, and lateral
transport of energy by
ocean, air, and latent heat currents in and out of the E & W Pacific Ocean areas won't scale to global wa
ocean, air, and latent
heat currents in and out of the E & W Pacific
Ocean areas won't scale to global wa
Ocean areas won't scale to global warming
CO2 concentration was then instantaneously doubled, and the model was integrated to a new equilibrium
with unchanged implied
ocean heat transport...
In CMIP3, an AGCM was coupled to a non-dynamic mixed - layer (slab)
ocean model
with prescribed
ocean heat transport convergence.
Consenquently, the associated SST pattern is slightly cooler in the deep convection upwelling regions of the Equitorial Pacific and the Indian
Ocean, strongly cooler in the nearest deep convection source region of the South Atlantic near Africa and the Equator, warm over the bulk of the North Atlantic, strongly warmer where the gulf stream loses the largest portion of its
heat near 50N 25W, and strongly cooler near 45N 45W, which turns out to be a back - eddy of the Gulf Stream
with increased
transport of cold water from the north whenever the Gulf Stream is running quickly.
An atmospheric general circulation model coupled to a simple mixed layer
ocean was forced
with altered implied
ocean heat transports during a period of increasing trace gases.
The theory suggests that not as much
heat is getting
transported to that region of the North Atlantic anymore — and this could indicate a big problem
with one of the
ocean's most important currents.
The difference in the climatological mean June - July - August
ocean heat content as measured by the depth of the 20 °C isotherm (in meters) overlaid
with corresponding differences in
ocean heat transport vectors (W / m) between two numerical climate models
with slightly different bathymetries.
If you have faith in the climate models and have any knowledge of what they do
with reduced poleward
ocean heat transport, then you are expecting cooling unless the AMOC should speed back up.
This has nothing to do
with heat transport into the
ocean, although that phenomenon, in my view, also supports fairly high sensitivities once the evidence for significant rates of deep
ocean transport are factored in (but that's a different topic).
Fred, It has a lot to do
with heat transport into the
oceans.
Combined
with my link that indicates the
ocean heat transport from the Atlantic to the Arctic had been increasing over that time period.
Has mostly to do
with poleward
ocean heat transport.
AGW climate scientists seem to ignore that while the earth's surface may be warming, our atmosphere above 10,000 ft. above MSL is a refrigerator that can take water vapor scavenged from the vast
oceans on earth (which are also a formidable
heat sink), lift it to cold zones in the atmosphere by convective physical processes, chill it (removing vast amounts of
heat from the atmosphere) or freeze it, (removing even more vast amounts of
heat from the atmosphere) drop it on land and
oceans as rain, sleet or snow, moisturizing and cooling the soil, cooling the
oceans and building polar ice caps and even more importantly, increasing the albedo of the earth,
with a critical negative feedback determining how much of the sun's energy is reflected back into space, changing the moment of inertia of the earth by removing water mass from equatorial latitudes and
transporting this water vapor mass to the poles, reducing the earth's spin axis moment of inertia and speeding up its spin rate, etc..
They forced the model
with CO2 and happened to catch it when it was in the process of increasing poleward
ocean heat transport.
Obviously the
ocean cycles then
transport heat subsequently so that there is immediate and long - term output to atmosphere that shows up in temperature series
with long - term (150 + years) Temp / PDO + AMO+S unspot integral correlation 0.96.
It has to do
with intermittent
transport of
heat into the deep
ocean.
It has been noted in a five - member multi-model ensemble analysis that, associated
with the changes in temperature of the upper
ocean in Figure 10.7, the tropical Pacific Ocean heat transport remains nearly constant with increasing greenhouse gases due to the compensation of the subtropical cells and the horizontal gyre variations, even as the subtropical cells change in response to changes in the trade winds (Hazeleger, 2
ocean in Figure 10.7, the tropical Pacific
Ocean heat transport remains nearly constant with increasing greenhouse gases due to the compensation of the subtropical cells and the horizontal gyre variations, even as the subtropical cells change in response to changes in the trade winds (Hazeleger, 2
Ocean heat transport remains nearly constant
with increasing greenhouse gases due to the compensation of the subtropical cells and the horizontal gyre variations, even as the subtropical cells change in response to changes in the trade winds (Hazeleger, 2005).
Associated
with the warming, there has been an enhanced atmospheric hydrological cycle in the Southern
Ocean that results in an increase of the Antarctic sea ice for the past three decades through the reduced upward ocean heat transport and increased snow
Ocean that results in an increase of the Antarctic sea ice for the past three decades through the reduced upward
ocean heat transport and increased snow
ocean heat transport and increased snowfall.
Kind of like mentioning the impact of
ocean heat transport and the inherent lags associated
with huge irregularly sized basins.
Remember that webster doesn't consider
ocean heat transport worth bothering
with, so he can just approximate the
oceans as a block of copper.
To ascertain
with confidence the extent to which deep water production impacts the
ocean's meridional circulation and hence the
ocean's contributions to the global poleward
heat flux, continuous measures of trans - basin mass and
heat transports are needed.
Well... that human CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do
with this natural
ocean circulation
heat transport and weather system.
My impression is that you think that «self - propelling» climate «trends» (something nebulous to do
with changes in
ocean heat transport occurring for no known reason) are an alternative explanation for modern warming.
Alternatively, it may be the result of increased
ocean heat transports due to either an enhanced thermohaline circulation (Raymo et al., 1989; Rind and Chandler, 1991) or increased flow of surface
ocean currents due to greater wind stresses (Ravelo et al., 1997; Haywood et al., 2000), or associated
with the reduced extent of land and sea ice (Jansen et al., 2000; Knies et al., 2002; Haywood et al., 2005).
Ocean heat transport is calculated with the slab - ocean calibration procedure described a
Ocean heat transport is calculated
with the slab -
ocean calibration procedure described a
ocean calibration procedure described above.
R Gates - Increased
heat transport into the deep
ocean is broadly consistent
with what is known about the wind - driven
ocean circulation.
actually the average temperature depends strongly on meridional circulation that
transports a lot of
heat towards the high latitudes — especially
with oceans that are, to say the least, not very well described and understood.
For the real earth,
with a significant
heat capacity and significant atmospheric and
ocean transport, the one summary number that has meaning is the average of T ^ 4 over the surface of the earth... That is what is going to go into determination of the global surface radiative balance.
Given a free choice of GCMs, I would not choose to use OHC data from a model
with a known
ocean heat transport problem.
We find that the energy
transport associated
with wind - driven
ocean gyres is closely coupled to the energy
transport of the midlatitude atmosphere so that, for example, the
heat transport of both systems scales in approximately the same way
with the meridional temperature gradient in midlatitudes.