Sentences with phrase «with oceanic heat»

Enhanced oceanic warming along the equator is also evident in the zonal means of Figure 10.6, and can be associated with oceanic heat flux changes (Watterson, 2003) and forced by the atmosphere (Liu et al., 2005).

Not exact matches

Just how rapidly the oceanic heat will resurface to warm the land is «something that we struggle with,» said Scripps's Gille.

This is consistent with the finding that reduced warming is not mainly a result of a change in radiation balance but due to oceanic heat storage.

The great flow of Arctic deep water comes mainly from THC and is fed with NAD.It prooves the great sinking of water in this zone and the great oceanic heat transfer.

The substance of the «discourse» @ 104, of «that issue» @ 104, of those «comments regarding time delays with respect to oceanic heating» @ 104, of the «point (ing) out (of)... evidence» @ 104, of the «what I've written» @ 104 is apparently a «question» and apparently a yet - to - be-answered question to boot.

The oceanic boundary layer (the thermocline), with its much more vast reservoirs of heat, operates on much longer time scales.

Nature (with hopefully some constructive input from humans) will decide the global warming question based upon climate sensitivity, net radiative forcing, and oceanic storage of heat, not on the type of multi-decadal time scale variability we are discussing here.

Meanwhile I can't help but notice that no one has of yet engaged with my comments regarding time delays with respect to oceanic heating.

The AMO1 (compressed) time sequence is a bit perplexing, but it is to do with North Icelandic Jet current, major player in the Nordic Seas summer oceanic heat release into atmosphere.

Geomagnetic storms hit the Arctic, induce strong currents, disturbing the Earth's field and feed back into the oceanic currents, releasing some of the stored heat during the previous cycle (with less geomagnetic input):

Geomagnetic storms hit the Arctic, induce strong currents, disturbing the Earth's field and feed back into the oceanic currents, releasing some of the stored heat during the previous cycle (with less geomagnetic input): http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/Spc.htm

The formula is based on known ideas due to Arrhenius in 1896 and Hofmann in 2009 (that the portion of atmospheric CO2 above the preindustrial level is growing exponentially), with the added twist that the oceanic heat sink delays the impact of radiative forcing variations on HadCRUT3 by 15 years, analogously to the overheating of a CPU being delayed by the addition of a heatsink with no fan, what I refer to as the Hansen delay.

In some way, that's the engine where all the other variations must be hanged (specially variations in albedo because of clouds - maybe connected with solar cycles as other authors are trying to prove -, variations in albedo because of sea ice extention, linked with the oceanic currents - as in the «stadium wave» that was presented by Curry and others, etc., variations in heat exchange between atmosphere and oceans, and so on.

With a dominant internal component having the structure of the observed warming, and with radiative restoring strong enough to keep the forced component small, how can one keep the very strong radiative restoring from producing heat loss from the oceans totally inconsistent with any measures of changes in oceanic heat contWith a dominant internal component having the structure of the observed warming, and with radiative restoring strong enough to keep the forced component small, how can one keep the very strong radiative restoring from producing heat loss from the oceans totally inconsistent with any measures of changes in oceanic heat contwith radiative restoring strong enough to keep the forced component small, how can one keep the very strong radiative restoring from producing heat loss from the oceans totally inconsistent with any measures of changes in oceanic heat contwith any measures of changes in oceanic heat content?

''... how can one keep the very strong radiative restoring from producing heat loss from the oceans totally inconsistent with any measures of changes in oceanic heat content?»

Sea ice with its strong seasonal and interannual variability (Fig. 1) is a very critical component of the Arctic system that responds sensitively to changes in atmospheric circulation, incoming radiation, atmospheric and oceanic heat fluxes, as well as the hydrological cycle1, 2.

I have already made it clear elsewhere that the additional resistor effect of human CO2 would be insignificant in relation to that from the rest of the air and the oceans together with the varying solar and oceanic heating and cooling effects but we still need to know for sure whether it is significant at all over periods of less than several hundred years because that may be the time we need to solve our energy, pollution, resource and population problems.

The measurements from the 3000 oceanic ARGO buoys since 2003 may suggest a slight decrease of the oceanic heat content between the surface and a depth 700 m with very significant regional differences.

These aquaplanet simulations are sometimes run with prescribed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and sometimes with prescribed heat flux through the surface (usually realized by running the atmosphere over a «slab ocean» s saturated surface with some heat capacity, and specifying an «oceanic heat flux» into or out of the slab.

While I'm comfortable with the heat flow measurements on land, I doubt that the measurements of oceanic crust are as reliable.