Such an approach would be a sea change from the approach currently pursued by Stephen Harper's government, which has pressed ahead
with oil sands development and gutted environmental protections of Canada's lakes and rivers, all the while gagging federal scientists to stop the release of data that may contradict the Conservatives» agenda.
Not exact matches
The Panel excluded any discussion of the environmental impacts of
oil sands development, although they did allow the consideration of increased
oil prices generated by the pipeline on the taxes and royalties associated
with forecast future
oil sands production.
«There's a question of whether going along
with the approval of the Northern Gateway pipeline will make LNG
development in B.C. more challenging by angering First Nations so adamantly opposed to the
oil sands pipeline,» said George Hoberg, a professor at the University of British Columbia's school of forestry and founder of UBCC350, a group pressing for action on greenhouse gas emissions.
From a strictly legal perspective, the relevant question is not whether there is a sufficient connection to any particular existing or proposed
oil sands development or other production activity, and certainly not whether such projects or activities were included in the Terms of Reference (ToR), but rather simply whether the GHGs associated
with the production of bitumen that will be transported by the NGP are an «environmental effect» of that project (see NGP Report, Volume II, Appendix 4, Terms of Reference, which defines «environmental effect» very broadly to mean «any change that the project may cause in the environment.»
«Until ongoing efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions associated
with the production of
oil sands are more successful and widespread, the Final SEIS makes clear that, compared to reference crudes,
development of
oil sands crude represents a significant increase in greenhouse gas emissions,» the EPA states in a letter made public Tuesday.
First, the Board had ruled that it would not consider the environmental and socio - economic effects associated
with upstream activities, the
development of the Alberta
oil sands, and the downstream use of
oil transported by the pipeline.
Seeing an opportunity to offset some of the emissions from its
oil -
sands development, the province of Alberta committed Can $ 2 billion (US$ 2.1 billion) to sequestration in 2008 and is now working out agreements
with commercial partners on four projects.
We still don't know enough about tar
sand oil, or bitumen, which takes longer to break down due to its high viscosity, but doesn't spread, we also don't know much about the behavior of
oil from a blowout, such as the Deepwater Horizon BP blowout, and we know little of how crude
oil behaves in the Arctic Ocean, where there is ice, or how to remediate it,» said Michel Boufadel, director of NJIT's Center for Natural Resources
Development and Protection and a member of the panel of experts charged
with evaluating the impact of spills in Northern waters.
From a climate policy perspective, the bill can be seen as part of the Conservative ongoing effort to 1) gut environmental assessments and scientific research; 2) attack ENGOs that disagree
with government policy to promote unfettered
development of the
oil sands; and 3) to sideline and even eliminate inconvenient advisory bodies like the National Roundtable on Energy and the Environment.
The exhibition will include several of Hart's large, colorful abstractions, many painted in
oil with the addition of
sand, along
with selected early works that prefigure her
development toward an abstract voice.
Kate Galbraith has a post about an article in Canada's Globe and Mail newspaper that the country's prime minister, Stephen Harper, will seek a climate - change agreement
with President - elect Barack Obama that would protect
development of Alberta's
oil sands.
We empower local communities to protect themselves from reckless fracking operations, and we partner
with leading scientists, financial analysts, and First Nations to stop the expansion of dirty tar
sands oil development.
On the contrary, Figure 1 is a conservative estimate of potential emissions from tar
sands because: the economically extractable amount grows
with technology
development and
oil price; the total tar
sands resource is larger than the known resource, possibly much larger; extraction of tar
sands oil uses conventional
oil and gas, which will show up as additions to the purple bars in Figure 1;
development of tar
sands will destroy overlying forest and prairie ecology, emitting biospheric CO2 to the atmosphere.
Two consulting firms provided State Department
with key analysis of whether the pipeline would speed
development of Canada's
oil sands.
IHS CERA's new environmental assessment of the Keystone XL pipeline and pipeline - related
oil sands development sends a pretty clear message to President Obama as he decides whether to approve the full project's construction: There's not a climate rationale for rejecting the pipeline — and along
with it, tens of thousands of U.S. jobs, economic uplift and greater energy security.
Indeed, our analysis supports recent comments in the EPA's review of the State Department's final impact statement that,
with oil prices in a sustained range of $ 65 - $ 75, «construction of the pipeline is projected to change the economics of
oil sands development and result in increased
oil sands production, and the accompanying greenhouse gas emissions, over what would otherwise occur» [2].
Additional escalation of the mining impact occurs as conventional
oil mining is supplanted by tar
sands development,
with mining and land disturbance from the latter producing land use - related greenhouse gas emissions as much as 23 times greater than conventional
oil production per unit area [152], but
with substantial variability and uncertainty [152]--[153].
Norway, which along
with the other Scandinavian countries has been among the most ambitious and successful of all nations in reducing its emissions, nevertheless approves expanded
oil drilling in the Arctic and
development of tar
sands as a majority owner of Statoil [258]--[259].
Despite environmentalists» campaign to end
oil sands development, crude from Alberta will be developed
with or without the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, says Gary Doer, Canada's ambassador to the U.S..
•
Oil sands development associated
with the Keystone XL could support 117,000 new U.S. jobs by 2035, according to the Canadian Energy Research Institute (CERI).
There are certainly a lot of questions
with respect to
oil sands development, and GHG emissions are but one of them.
She reports there are about 960 American companies that support Alberta
oil sands activities,
with thousands more jobs that could be created if the U.S. would take steps to promote greater
oil sands development — such as approving the Keystone XL pipeline.
I do not agree
with the view that preventing new pipelines will do little to slow
development of the
oil sands or that the
development of access to foreign markets for bitumen is inevitable.