Sentences with phrase «with other legal service providers»

Not exact matches

U.S. President Donald Trump's crackdown on illegal immigration and his move to strip Haitians, Salvadorans and others of their temporary legal status have had a broad effect on Canada's refugee system, Reuters interviews with social service providers, government officials and a review of Canadian immigration data show.

The Trustee, along with the Sponsor, will liaise with the Trust's legal, accounting and other professional service providers as needed.

In addition, Innovative Dining Group may disclose personally identifiable information about you to other companies or individuals in the following circumstances: - Innovative Dining Group utilizes third party service providers to provide products, services or functions on IDG's behalf (such as sending emails or processing credit cards or fulfilling orders placed online) and asks these service providers to agree to maintain the confidentiality of your personally identifiable information and not to use your personally identifiable information for any reason except to carry out the purpose (s) for which we retained them; - Innovative Dining Group needs to protect its legal rights (e.g., if Innovative Dining Group is trying to collect money you owe); - Innovative Dining Group must comply with applicable laws, regulations or legal or regulatory processes; - Innovative Dining Group has reason to believe that someone may be causing injury to someone or interfering with - In connection with a sale, merger, transfer, exchange or other disposition of all or a portion of the business conducted by the web site.

This historic change, which brings New York in line with 48 other states, is also thanks to the voices of impacted youth and families, faith leaders, advocates, providers, legal service organizations, Family Court Judges, and citizens who have spent many years urging New York to Raise the Age!»

While he does not think solos and small firms will be competitive with big corporate legal service providers, he does think innovative small firms may be able to prosper other ways.

SmartAdvocate ®, the incredibly powerful, web - based, integrated case management system designed for personal injury, mass tort litigation, medical malpractice and other litigation practices, is pleased to announce that it has entered into a strategic alliance with Legal Inspection Services, a nationwide provider of inspection services to laServices, a nationwide provider of inspection services to laservices to law firms.

[5] Other examples are not so commonly predicted (if, indeed, they are predicted at all), yet are no less significant: business models that facilitate free legal services, the use of non-legal (notably industry and business) knowledge and experience to increase client trust in and comfort with the firm and with legal services more generally, the collection of knowledge about the legal issues of individual clients in the same industry for use by a trade association to assist and defend the rights of all in that industry on a collective basis, a severely injured client's reassurance and comfort in knowing that in selecting a certain legal services provider the client is not just receiving highly specialized advice but also benefitting an association that helps others with the same type of severe injury, the development of a legal research establishment for experimentation with different ways of providing legal services.

They methodically scan the horizon; focus on useful, well - defined projects; cultivate stakeholders; build partnerships within the enterprise and with others in the legal ecosystem; establish success metrics; and collect and provide thoughtful feedback to service providers to help shape software development.

Use in connection with any legal matter that directly or indirectly involves Rocket Lawyer or any of its affiliates, directors, agents, employees, or other Rocket Lawyer service providers; or

Like with running any other professional services business, legal plan providers must prioritize firm infrastructure and operations alongside the actual practice of law.

The legal services market is a market, with plenty of providers to compete with each other.

They then determine the best solution; it may be that the issue can be solved by the in - house team of lawyers either through education or legal skill; it may be that there is a technology solution to the issue that will allow it to be solved in - house; it may be that an LPO or other non-law firm service provider can deal with the matter; and if all else fails, there is always a law firm.

No other single provider groups these legal and non-legal services together the way we do — typically clients need to work with three or four other organizations to get the same services.

Even if a law or legal policy or practice is designed to include persons with disabilities, persons may be denied or delayed in exercising their rights under these laws because of the attitudes of justice system workers, service providers and others who implement them.

But the gap is closing, possibly because there is now more interchange between law and other industries, supported by in - house legal department engagement with technology which also involves the legal service providers they instruct.

If you are a lawyer, paralegal, or other legal service provider interested in our services, message us to find out about opportunities with Canada Legal Help, or to connect with our slegal service provider interested in our services, message us to find out about opportunities with Canada Legal Help, or to connect with our sLegal Help, or to connect with our staff.

advice on legal relationships with suppliers, including medical equipment manufacturers, IT service providers, caterers and suppliers of food and other products / services;

Some Legal Solutions Group clients like to work with us on a traditional hourly rate structure, as with most other workers» compensation attorneys or providers of legal servLegal Solutions Group clients like to work with us on a traditional hourly rate structure, as with most other workers» compensation attorneys or providers of legal servlegal services.

As part of our work, we looked at how client expectations are changing and noted in our research that their experience with other services providers is, not surprisingly perhaps, influencing what they expect from the legal profession.

Launched Tuesday, the Coalition of Professional Services Providers says it is «dedicated to addressing and advancing the interests of solution providers working with legal and other professional services communitiesServices Providers says it is «dedicated to addressing and advancing the interests of solution providers working with legal and other professional services communitieProviders says it is «dedicated to addressing and advancing the interests of solution providers working with legal and other professional services communitieproviders working with legal and other professional services communitiesservices communities.»

• Bring members of the Deaf community, interpreters, legal service providers, governments and others together to create a vision that will be refined with knowledge gained from the above service delivery project.

Based on that success, the client might be ready to open up more of her activities and dealings outside the legal sphere — with employees, suppliers, service providers and others.

Benchers of the Law Society of British Columbia have approved a merger with the Society of Notaries Public of B.C., to create a program for the creation of «certified paralegals» and, as well, to develop a regulatory framework to credential and regulate other legal service providers.

The bank selected the six firms based on four key criteria: the use of legal project managers, collaboration with other law firms or other services providers, sophistication around pricing arrangements, and thought leadership.

RECOMMENDATION 21.4 To address the more pressing gaps in services, the Australian, State and Territory Governments should provide additional funding for civil legal assistance services in order to: • better align the means test used by legal aid commissions with that of other measures of disadvantage • maintain existing frontline services that have a demonstrated benefit to the community • allow legal assistance providers to offer a greater number of services in areas of law that have not previously attracted government funding.

More specifically, under the LPUL, each of the «principals» of each type of legal service provider (not just ILPs) is responsible for the firm's compliance with professional conduct and other rules.

To add insult to injury, legal software developers provide integration with Dropbox unsecured storage service more any other cloud provider.

API Legal Outreach partners with community - based organizations such as the Pilipino Bayanihan Resource Center, Bayanihan Community Center, Chinatown Community Development, Cannon Kip, Vet Equity Center, Filipinos for Justice, 1st Mongolian Christian Church and other service providers to provide legal clinics that target specific underserved populations, in particular, the elderly and newer API immigrant populatLegal Outreach partners with community - based organizations such as the Pilipino Bayanihan Resource Center, Bayanihan Community Center, Chinatown Community Development, Cannon Kip, Vet Equity Center, Filipinos for Justice, 1st Mongolian Christian Church and other service providers to provide legal clinics that target specific underserved populations, in particular, the elderly and newer API immigrant populatlegal clinics that target specific underserved populations, in particular, the elderly and newer API immigrant populations.

In the same way, Georgetown University Law Center students and other students in the Legal Services Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal guidLegal Services Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal gServices Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal guidlegal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal gservices providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal guidlegal guidance.

The proposal contained a list of ten regulatory objectives, and as well as an explanation that «each state's highest court» not only be guided by the objectives when assessing the court's «existing regulatory framework,» but also with respect to «any other regulations they may choose to develop concerning non-traditional legal service providers.»

Interestingly, and seemingly in defiance of this caveat, in late March and early April 2016 the Commission issued two «Issues Papers» calling for comments, one with respect to the regulation of as - yet «unregulated legal service providers,» [31] and the other with respect to alternative structures.

We got our first customers, started building out our network of innovative legal service providers that are willing to engage with their clients via LawVu (and even ended up with some that wanted to pay us for the product so that they could share it with other clients) and had built an all star team.

The Access Legal Care «system» is based on 12 key components: 1) be profitable for the attorneys and legal - services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and cliLegal Care «system» is based on 12 key components: 1) be profitable for the attorneys and legal - services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and clilegal - services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and clilegal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and clinics.

Re: lawyers practising in association with non-lawyers: - Absolutely necessary because: (1) technology will be the basis of almost all laws, therefore we will have to practice with other experts in that technology; (2) records management law will be a major area of practice because, records are the most frequently used form of evidence and e-records depend for everything on their e-records management systems (ERMSs), and they must be compliant with the National Standards of Canada for e-records management, which standards require legal opinions, and every significant change to an ERMS requires a legal opinion re ability to produce records able to satisfy laws as to e-discovery, admissibility of evidence, privacy & access to information, electronic commerce, tax laws, and compliance with National Standards of Canada for e-records management; (3) all new technologies require a legal framework, which means more work for lawyers; and, (4) otherwise, other professions and service providers who now provide «legal information,» will begin to provide «legal advice» and other services that only lawyers should be providing.

Additionally, recognizing that a cyber - or privacy - related development can expand to encompass a number of other significant legal issues, our group works hand - in - glove with attorneys in our White Collar Defense, Regulatory and Investigations, Securities Litigation, Complex Commercial Litigation, Business Finance & Restructuring and Employment Litigation practices, among others, to address subsequent risks such as government or regulatory inquiries, shareholder, consumer, or employee class action litigation, trade secrets theft, funding or financial issues, and disputes with vendors, service providers and other third parties.

What I'm hoping will happen in the next three years is that funders of health care, social services, housing, etc. and legal aid providers and courts will embrace working with groups outside of the legal domain and start using forms and technology to bring preventative law into places where vulnerable communities go for help with other pressing needs.

To share information with third parties for the purpose of providing legal services, including data service providers, printers, registry agents, other suppliers of products and services, opposing counsel, foreign counsel, witnesses and experts;

Acumen acts as the «quarterback», linking senior management with other professional services providers including legal, accounting and financing partners.

This model has been successfully implemented over the years at Chicago - Kent College of Law, where their A2J Author Student Editorial Board works in collaboration with Illinois Legal Aid Online and other participating legal service providers to create guided intervLegal Aid Online and other participating legal service providers to create guided intervlegal service providers to create guided interviews.

In the first of these three Issues Papers («New Categories of Legal Services Providers» [80]-RRB-, the Commission sought feedback on whether persons (individuals, not companies or other organizations), referred to as «LSPs» should be allowed, via judicial authorization and regulation, «to perform discreet and limited legal tasks with the goal of improving access to legal services.&rLegal Services Providers» [80]-RRB-, the Commission sought feedback on whether persons (individuals, not companies or other organizations), referred to as «LSPs» should be allowed, via judicial authorization and regulation, «to perform discreet and limited legal tasks with the goal of improving access to legal servicesServices Providers» [80]-RRB-, the Commission sought feedback on whether persons (individuals, not companies or other organizations), referred to as «LSPs» should be allowed, via judicial authorization and regulation, «to perform discreet and limited legal tasks with the goal of improving access to legal services.&rlegal tasks with the goal of improving access to legal services.&rlegal servicesservices.»

At the same time, «technology, globalization, economic and other forces» transform how legal services are accessed and delivered, with new, untraditional, providers emerging online and offline to offer services in very different ways.

In addition to the webconference tool, the LPP has benefitted from partnerships with other legal tech service providers who have offered their platforms and services for use by candidates in the program.

Legal Aid attorneys work in partnership with other service providers to address community issues and engage in community legal educaLegal Aid attorneys work in partnership with other service providers to address community issues and engage in community legal educalegal education.

Are there any promising models in other jurisdictions in Canada or abroad that Ontario should consider, with respect to the role of family law legal service providers, other than lawyers?

Process improvement involves more input from and ongoing communication with clients; the use of new kinds of legal personnel, not all of them lawyers or employees of the firm; greater selectivity about the work that will be done, possibly omitting work that is not essential to the case; the disaggregation of some legal projects into discrete parts that may be handled by more than one law firm or vendor; and greater collaboration with the client and other legal service providers working together on a matter.

Since 31 March 2009 the Solicitors Regulation Authority («SRA») has allowed solicitors to practise in partnership or other association with barristers, patent or trade mark agents and other legal service providers and some non-lawyers.

The study concludes that legal services providers would be disadvantaged disproportionately compared with the UK economy as a whole due to their reliance on intermediate demand from other sectors likely to be adversely affected, particularly financial and other professional services, and from resulting lower levels of business investment.

Aug 11, 2016 (Mimesis Law)-- With the rise of Legal Service Providers and other disruptors of the legal industry, new business models are evolving to provide services that law firms used to handle exclusiLegal Service Providers and other disruptors of the legal industry, new business models are evolving to provide services that law firms used to handle exclusilegal industry, new business models are evolving to provide services that law firms used to handle exclusively.

It is emblematic of a burgeoning collaboration process that has three central components: (1) machines working with machines; and (2) machines working with legal service providers — lawyers, other professionals, and paraprofessionals; and (3) machines working directly with — and for — the consumer (individuals or businesses) to provide self - help, self - serve and collaboration in fulfillment of certain legal needs.

As I see it, Google's free legal research services won't put a dent in LEXIS or Westlaw, at least not for a long, long time,  Instead, they pose a threat to what I've collectively termed the «second city» providers like Versuslaw, Casemaker, FastCase or Loislaw. Right now, most lawyers are able to access those services for free or cheap through deals with the bars — but will bars continue to support those subscriptions when there's a robust free option available? My heart goes out to these companies because they served as an oasis for solos when no other options, save the law library and manual research, existed. Yet I don't see all of them able to survive the Google onslaught.