Sentences with phrase «with parental responsibility for the child»

Case law has confirmed that a Local Authority with parental responsibility for a child / young person (under a care order) can not consent to arrangements that would otherwise amount to a deprivation of liberty.

If a child is Gillick competent and wishes to receive treatment, their consent alone is sufficient authority without the need to obtain parental consent; although those with parental responsibility for the child should generally be consulted (subject to any valid refusal of consent to share information).

Each person with parental responsibility for the child must consent to the trip before the child travels abroad.

Adoption permanently transfers all the legal rights and responsibilities of being a parent from the child's birth parents (or anyone with parental responsibility for the child) to the adoptive parents.

The child's parents / carers A parent or a person with parental responsibility for the child may come to the hearing even if they are not the person making the appeal or claim.

The word parents in this charter includes parents, any other people with parental responsibility for the child or who care for him or her.

(c) the jurisdiction of the court to take the measure is accepted by the parents and each other person with parental responsibility for the child; and

The Local Authority, or persons with parental responsibility for the child, can apply for the discharge of the Order.

This is the part of the law (Section 20 of the Children act 1989) that says Children's Services should look after a child when there is no - one with parental responsibility for the child or when the person caring for the child is prevented from caring for them, for whatever reason.

Not exact matches

I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackChildren Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smackchildren the right to take legal action against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»

But in doing so the State must not interfere with parental responsibility, nor hamper the reasonable liberty of parents in their choice of a school for their children.

To qualify for this right, you must be named on your child's birth certificate or adoption certificate, or have legal Parental Responsibility — whether or not you live full - time with the child (find out more by reading the Dads» FAQ on Parental Responsibility, which you'll find via the link below).

A parenting plan sets the tone for each parent's rights and responsibilities with respect to the child and can help minimize any parental conflict for the child.

In what may prove reassuring for those who wish to shift the argument from self or government censorship to parental responsibility, the poll showed that a majority of parents (63 percent) monitor what their children watch either «frequently» or «occasionally,» with 82 percent of parents of younger children (ages 2 - 11) supervising the youngsters» viewing.

This could lead to deeper and rewarding change at best, and provides the child with parental role models who are taking responsibility to search for solutions instead of creating an atmosphere of despair and victimization.

If you have parental responsibility for a child you don't live with, you don't necessarily have a right to contact with them - but the other parent still needs to keep you updated about their well - being and progress.

The movement has formally gone from a position of opposition to vaccines to one of parental choice — although surely schools, with responsibility for children's wellbeing, should advocate vaccination.

Consent for MMR vaccination of young children is given by a person with parental responsibility.

As a component of the school - level parental involvement policy mandated by federal law Title I, each school served under this part shall jointly develop with parents for all children served under this part a school - parent compact that outlines how parents, the entire school staff, and students will share the responsibility for improved student achievement and the means by which the school and parents will build and develop a partnership to help children achieve the State's high standards.

Consent for a child to travel abroad should be obtained from the other parent or anyone else who has parental responsibility for the child (e.g. a grandparent with a child arrangements or special guardianship order).

In most cases, parental responsibility for a minor child will be shared by both parents so that each retains full parental rights and responsibilities with respect to their child.

For example, the court looks at the history of the relationship between the children and each parent, the moral fitness of each parent, mental and physical health of each parent, the division of parental responsibilities after the divorce, the ability for each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othFor example, the court looks at the history of the relationship between the children and each parent, the moral fitness of each parent, mental and physical health of each parent, the division of parental responsibilities after the divorce, the ability for each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othfor each parent to provide a routine for the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the othfor the children, how the children relate to each parent, which parent is more likely to foster a good relationship between the children and the other parent, and which is more likely to share information and to encourage frequent time - sharing with the other.

Eligibility Parental leave is available to any employee with one year's continuous service who has, or expects to have, parental responsibility for Parental leave is available to any employee with one year's continuous service who has, or expects to have, parental responsibility for parental responsibility for a child.

For purposes of establishing or modifying parental responsibility and creating, developing, approving, or modifying a parenting plan, including a time - sharing schedule, which governs each parent's relationship with his or her minor child and the relationship between each parent with regard to his or her minor child, the best interest of the child shall be the primary consideration.

Although the local authority might have the statutory power under s. 33 (3)(b) to prevent M from calling the twins «Preacher» and «Cyanide», there was a small category of cases where, notwithstanding the local authority's powers under s. 33 (3)(b), the consequences of the exercise of a particular act of parental responsibility were so profound and had such an impact on either the child his or herself, and / or the Art. 8 rights of those other parties who shared parental responsibility with a local authority, that the matter must come before the court for its consideration and determination.

However, in England and Wales children can not be moved from their country of residence without the consent of everyone who holds parental responsibility for them, or with court's permission.

Eligible employees may request a flexible working arrangement to assist with care for: A child or children under the age of eighteen for whom the employee has assumed parental responsibility; A person or persons with a serious health condition in a family relationship with the employee; or A parent (age 65 or older) of the employee.

Persons with parental responsibility are able to provide consent for children and young persons for decisions which fall within the «scope of parental responsibility».

This position is supported in the Code of Practice to the Mental Health Act 1983 which now states that it would be inadvisable for practitioners to rely on the consent of a person with parental responsibility to treat a young capacitated person or a competent child who has refused the treatment.

if it is irreconcilable with a later judgment relating to parental responsibility given in another Member State or in the non-Member State of the habitual residence of the child provided that the later judgment fulfils the conditions necessary for its recognition in the Member State in which recognition is sought.

Judgments given before the date of application of this Regulation but after the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 in proceedings instituted before the date of entry into force of Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 shall be recognised and enforced in accordance with the provisions of Chapter III of this Regulation provided they relate to divorce, legal separation or marriage annulment or parental responsibility for the children of both spouses on the occasion of these matrimonial proceedings and that jurisdiction was founded on rules which accorded with those provided for either in Chapter II of this Regulation or in Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 or in a convention concluded between the Member State of origin and the Member State addressed which was in force when the proceedings were instituted.

This means that jurisdiction should lie in the first place with the Member State of the child's habitual residence, except for certain cases of a change in the child's residence or pursuant to an agreement between the holders of parental responsibility.

In order to ensure equality for all children, this Regulation covers all decisions on parental responsibility, including measures for the protection of the child, independently of any link with a matrimonial proceeding.

Relation with the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on Jurisdiction, Applicable law, Recognition, Enforcement and Cooperation in Respect of Parental Responsibility and Measures for the Protection of Children

a) the respondent was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; b) the respondent has submitted to the jurisdiction either expressly or by defending on the merits of the case without objecting to the jurisdiction at the first available opportunity; c) the creditor was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted; d) the child for whom maintenance was ordered was habitually resident in the State of origin at the time proceedings were instituted, provided that the respondent has lived with the child in that State or has resided in that State and provided support for the child there; e) except in disputes relating to maintenance obligations in respect of children, there has been agreement to the jurisdiction in writing by the parties; or f) the decision was made by an authority exercising jurisdiction on a matter of personal status or parental responsibility, unless that jurisdiction was based solely on the nationality of one of the parties.

A step - parent does not automatically obtain parental responsibility for a step - child just by marrying or entering into a civil partnership with the child's parent.

Grandparents have to seek permission to apply for a child arrangements order, unless the child has lived with them for at least three years or they have the consent of someone who has parental responsibility for the child.

Either party can petition the appropriate court for an adjudication of paternity (if this has not already been established in connection with the issuance of the birth certificate), and for a parental responsibility and child support order, at any time, if no such order is in place (assuming that Pennsylvania is the «home state» of the child and venue is...

-- Enabling parenting coordination by agreement or court order; — Amending the Commercial Arbitration Act to address family arbitrations; — integrating reproductive technologies into determining a child's legal parents; — Replacing the terms «custody» and «access» with «guardianship» and «parenting time»; — Defining «guardianship» through a list of «parental responsibilities» that can be allocated to allow for more customized parenting arrangements; — Extending the legislative property division regime to common - law spouses who have lived together for two years in a marriage - like relationship or who are in marriage - like relationship of some permanence and have children together; — Excluding certain types of property (e.g. pre-relationship property, gifts, and inheritances) from the pool of family property to be divided 50 - 50; and — Providing that debts are subject to equal division.

(a) By a parent: (I) By filing a petition for dissolution or legal separation; or (II) By filing a petition seeking the allocation of parental responsibilities with respect to a child in the county where the child is permanently resident or where the child is found; or

With regard to the Hague Convention of 19 October 1996 on parental responsibility and measures for the protection of children, the regulation is fully applicable if the child normally lives in an EU country.

The person named in a Child Arrangements Order shares parental responsibility for the child with the parents, and can make most important decisions on behalf of the child without needing the permission of the parChild Arrangements Order shares parental responsibility for the child with the parents, and can make most important decisions on behalf of the child without needing the permission of the parchild with the parents, and can make most important decisions on behalf of the child without needing the permission of the parchild without needing the permission of the parents.

(6) In any proceeding under this section, the court may not deny shared parental responsibility and time - sharing rights to a parent solely because that parent is or is believed to be infected with human immunodeficiency virus, but the court may, in an order approving the parenting plan, require that parent to observe measures approved by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention of the United States Public Health Service or by the Department of Health for preventing the spread of human immunodeficiency virus to the child.

To reach this decision, the court will evaluate several factors outlined in state law, such as each parent's ability to provide adequate care for the child, quality of each parent - child relationship, and each parent's willingness to engage in parental responsibilities and not intrude upon the other parent's relationship with the child.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child shall live — Where there are competing applications for the care of the children by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt aCHILDREN — With whom a child shall live — Where there are competing applications for the care of the children by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt and uWith whom a child shall live — Where there are competing applications for the care of the children by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren by the maternal grandmother, the maternal grandmother's former de-facto partner and the maternal great aunt and uncle — Where the children's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren's biological mother supports the maternal great aunt and uncle's application for sole parental responsibility and residence with them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt and uwith them for the subject children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle have parental responsibility for the mother's three youngest children — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Where the maternal great aunt and uncle will facilitate a relationship between the children and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren and the maternal family, including the children's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren's mother — Ordered the maternal aunt and uncle shall each have parental responsibility for the children, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren, to the exclusion of the mother and father of the children — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren — Ordered the children shall live with the maternal aunt achildren shall live with the maternal aunt and uwith the maternal aunt and uncle

If a parenting order has been made that provides for a child to spend time with, live with, communicate with a person, or a person is to have parental responsibility for a child, then it is an offence to send the child from Australia without an order of the Court or without the consent in writing of the person in whose favour the order has been made.

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — with whom the child lives — where there are allegations the father and paternal grandmother sexually abused the child — whether there is an unacceptable risk of harm to the child in the father's care — where the child has speech and language delays — where the child had spent unsupervised time with the father after separation — where the parties entered into final Consent Orders in October 2015 — where the allegations arose after that — where the child has been spending supervised time with the father since October 2016 — where the mother obtained a domestic violence protection order against the father in 2015 — where an order for equal shared parental responsibility is not in the child's best interests — where an unacceptable risk of harm is not found — where the mother is granted sole parental responsibility — where the child will continue to live primarily with the mother and spend unsupervised time with the father on an increasing basis

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Parenting — Parental responsibility — With whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tCHILDREN — Parenting — Parental responsibility — With whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tParental responsibility — With whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtWith whom the children shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren shall live and spend time — Separation of siblings — Where the two eldest children have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren have been living with the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the father and the youngest child has been living with the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the mother — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tparental responsibility for all three children and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren and for the children to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to live with them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith them ---- Where there are concerns about the mother's parenting capacity in relation to the two eldest children — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren — Where the mother's relationship with the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the youngest child is a protective factor for the child — Orders made for the father to have sole parental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tparental responsibility for the two eldest children and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren and the mother to have sole parental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tparental responsibility for the youngest child — Orders made for the two eldest children to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to live with the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the father and the youngest child to live with the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the mother — Orders made permitting the children to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age tchildren to determine when to spend time with the non-resident parent on reaching age thirtwith the non-resident parent on reaching age thirteen.

(i) if they are to share parental responsibility for the child under the plan — provisions of the kind referred to in paragraph 63C (2)(d)(which deals with the form of consultations between the parties to the plan) as a way of avoiding future conflicts over, or misunderstandings about, the matters covered by that paragraph; and

FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thCHILDREN — With whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the moWith whom a child lives and spends time — Best interests of the child — Whether either the mother or the father presents as an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father asserts that the mother is an unacceptable risk to the children — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father opposes orders for the mother to spend time with the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mowith the children — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where each party seeks sole parental responsibility — Where equal shared parental responsibility is untenable — Where the ICL recommended a three month suspension of the children's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren's time with the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mowith the father — Meaning of «meaningful relationship» — Where the mother recognises that it is in the best interest of the children to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren to have a meaningful relationship with the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mowith the father — Where a meaningful relationship has been established between the mother and the children — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren — Where the father does not consider that the children would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with thchildren would benefit from a significant and substantial relationship with the mowith the mother