Sentences with phrase «with particular questions»

Visit or call the planning office with particular questions.

A mechanism by which the court can deal with particular questions of fact, such as in respect of genealogy, by referring the question to one independent expert referee may therefore prove useful.

With these particular questions there is a sizeable risk that people don't understand the difference between the questions, and then write about the wrong thing.

You could also approach a film therapeutically by watching it with particular questions in mind, and attention to any emotional responses in order to discuss them in therapy.

Assisted customers with any particular questions and needs and was able to provide accurate product location and pricing.

Suggest that participants view the videos shown with particular questions in mind.

And I wrestled with that particular question.

We're not sure Michael Arndt will be utilizing Jar - Jar in his script but with this particular question being thrown every which way recently, I think the more important question is, is there anyone who would turn down a role in Star Wars?

Organized with the particular question «What happens to art after an artist and an institution come into contact?»

Not exact matches

In the discussion portion, a group of candidates — the number can vary — for a particular role are gathered in a room and presented with a question that can lean toward the philosophical («Should prisons be privatized?»)

The key when asking this particular question is to be honest with yourself.

Then, when meeting with non-C-level types — engineers, for instance — you might focus questions on the rationale about using a particular programming language, for instance.

The question is, when faced with your particular challenge — whether it is researching in a new field, starting a business, producing a film, securing a mentor, advancing an important cause — do you seek the respite of talk or do you face the struggle head - on?

Ever had a recruiter contact you about a job and ask you a bunch of questions about who you worked with at a particular employer?

Your colleagues are the people you turn to when you've got questions about how things work, how best to navigate a particular company policy or procedure, how to make a connection with a member of their business or other networks, and much more.

Wall Street had mixed views on whether the deal would truly help AT&T, with particular concerns focused on regulatory and financial questions.

Iraq in particular was a question mark, with reports saying that Iraqi officials were still disputing the «secondary sources» data well into the afternoon on Wednesday, even as oil prices were posting huge gains.

From a strictly legal perspective, the relevant question is not whether there is a sufficient connection to any particular existing or proposed oil sands development or other production activity, and certainly not whether such projects or activities were included in the Terms of Reference (ToR), but rather simply whether the GHGs associated with the production of bitumen that will be transported by the NGP are an «environmental effect» of that project (see NGP Report, Volume II, Appendix 4, Terms of Reference, which defines «environmental effect» very broadly to mean «any change that the project may cause in the environment.»

He, and backbenchers on the opposition side, would be free to stand up every so often and ask a question of the government about some matter of particular concern to him or his constituents — a question that had not been vetted by anyone with any authority over him.

One of the most popular social functions on Mobile Taobao is a Q&A feature called Wendajia (ask others) that lets shoppers with questions about a particular product get answers from members of the Taobao community.

Koba the Dread (2002) is a meditation on the massive cruelties of Stalin, with a particular emphasis on the question of whether we can wrap our minds around the enormity of millions and millions of deaths.

Looking around the sanctuary, I saw more than one person among the 200 or so present had arched an eyebrow and displayed a look of amazement that such a question would be asked; some with the particular knowledge that American Jews have faced questions of whether their loyalty is divided between the United States and Israel.

Such commitment obliges us to witness to the unique and irreplaceable task of the family in bringing up and forming our children in particular with respect to education in the faith, family education and questions relating to the right to life; subjects for frequent discussion, learning and reading in the family.

The important question regarding Jesus» self - identity is not whether he identified himself with any particular title.

Thus, we can say that this was a question that had fascinated him from the beginning: and that his understanding of what Zionists too called «the Jewish problem» was from the outset determined in the context of his hostility to anti-Semitism and did not arise later in the contexts of his hostility to particular plutocratic Jews (in 1911, he was reported as saying that «speaking generally, as with most other communities, «THE POOR JEWS [ARE] NICE AND THE RICH JEWS [ARE] NASTY» «-RRB-[My italics].

It is not necessary to illustrate this situation here at the beginning of our reflections with particular examples of the questions or proceedings which gave rise to disquiet, since we shall have to go into the matter, as far as is necessary and possible, when forming a judgment on it.

Ultimately, the question of whether or not masturbation is healthy for a particular person springs from the question that governs all good discernment: Does this action help me love myself and others more fully and freely, and does it allow me to love God more deeply and with more of myself?

Thus, the imaginative generalization begins with some salient feature of reality viewed within the perspective of some particular intellectual discipline and then posits a principle which is exemplified within that discipline, but whose scope is not limited to the discipline in question.

Paul Tillich defined this approach with particular clarity (and therefore in extreme form) in his «method of correlation»: «systematic theology proceeds in the following way: it makes an analysis of the human situation out of which the existential questions arise, and it demonstrates that the symbols used in the Christian message are the answers to these questions.»

The question is: What do they do when they deal with live people who are revolutionary in relation to the particular issue?

The significant ethical questions have to do not only with moral boundaries, but with how these are formed, who forms them, why a particular individual or group draws the lines here rather than there, how tightly or loosely lines are drawn, and how easily they contract or expand or erode.

This limitation is by no means evident in terms of the ontological principle as we know it from Process and Reality, but it was very real in terms of the ontological principle Whitehead was then working with: «That every condition to which the process of becoming conforms in any particular instance has its reason in the character of some actual entity whose objectification is one of the components entering into the particular instance in question» (EWM 323f).

It is because I believe that while Christians are learning from Buddhists, Buddhists in general, and Pure Land Buddhists in particular can also be enriched as they respond to questions with which Christians may have been wrestling more intensively for a longer period of time.

The concern with the wholeness of man rules out the attempt to answer the question of what man is in terms of particular philosophical disciplines:

Within that tradition, both in its political and ecclesial expression, authority is a way of ordering power within a community in such a way that, at one and the same time, it supports and augments common beliefs and ways of life and is regularly and harmoniously conjoined with a structure of offices that gives order to the exercise of authority and power within the particular society in question.

Actually the job in hand is much greater than just answering particular questions of «science and religion» such as might be discussed with great technical expertise at the Vatican Observatory — important though these are.

The reason for my present line of questioning with Steve and Brigitte is due their repeated claims of «truth» and «reality» being in alignment with their particular brand of beliefs.

When we deal with the question of the contemporary relevance of this particular text, we are reminded that the church continues its warfare against the principalities and powers.

I found discussion of both questions there, with an emphasis on the particular meaning of Christian freedom.

Of particular concern to Paul was a group of young widows who had infiltrated the church and developed a reputation for dressing promiscuously, sleeping around, gossiping, spreading unorthodox ideas, interrupting church services with questions, mooching off the church's widow fund, and generally making common floozies of themselves (1 Timothy 5).

When we ask whether this mythological language can be retained or translated into non-mythological language, we are inevitably confronted with the further question as to the meaning of the mythological language in this particular instance.

When the question is one about the education of the ministry it will not do to ignore either the general — the theological — nor the particular — the educational — approach; the theologian as educator or the educator as theologian can not carry on his theological and his educational critiques separately and independently, nor can he reduce them to one inquiry with one method in the hope of gaining one single answer.

For the moment, however, we concern ourselves with a particular aspect of Lindars's own work, his convincing demonstration of the fact that the pericope on the question of David's son, Mark 12.35 - 37, is a product of early Christian exegetical traditions and not a reminiscence of the ministry of Jesus.

Here he writes, in connection with the question of reconstructing authentic teaching of Jesus, «we have reasonably secure ground under our feet only in one particular instance, namely, when there is some way of showing that a piece of tradition has not been derived from Judaism and may not be ascribed to early Christianity, and this is particularly the case when Jewish Christianity has regarded this tradition as too bold and has toned it down or modified it in some way».

But its access to a possible way of explaining red would also differ from that of a being which had developed a particular sensibility for good or for ill with respect to a particular shade of red, so that the perception in question would give rise to pleasant or unpleasant feelings.

On the radio I use this simple rule to help me answer the majority of Bible questions I'm asked, even when I'm not familiar with the particular passage.

Nevertheless, some of my own convictions about what Christians and churches should do with respect to particular political and economic questions have been clearly implicit in these pages.

Even with all their particular differences, one can discover here a series of fundamental presuppositions common to both Dibelius and Bultmann and which both considered trustworthy beyond question.

still, with respect to particular cultural questions, we can usually identify one attitude as dominant.

But Creel sees that it would be begging the question to assume that this «all» includes familiarity with particular points on the continuum.