Sentences with phrase «with peak load»

PacifiCorp, a large utility in the northwestern United States, operates a system with a peak load of 8,300 MW that is expected to grow to 10,000 MW over the next decade.

With a peak load of 719 megawatts, we deliver a safe and reliable supply of electricity to over 152,549 customers from the residential, institutional, commercial and industrial sectors, through 2,820 kilometres of overhead and underground cables, spanning 420 square kilometres of service territory.

Regardless, for a system as high - powered as the PS4 is, it is pretty miserly with peak loads hitting 130 - 150 watts.

Not exact matches

With a contract now in place between Tesla and the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO), the battery «will help solve power outages, reduce intermittencies, and manage summertime peak load to support the reliability of South Australia's electrical infrastructure, providing enough power for more than 30,000 homes — approximately equal to the amount of homes that lost power during the blackout period last year,» Tesla said in a statement.

Having reached peak coconut yoghurt and with loads still left I decided to put it to good use and I don't... [Read more...]

We look forward to this all year long, and with good reason: When picked at the peak of ripeness, this grain is loaded with sweet, tender kernels that are great for boiling and slathering with butter, grilling, sautéing, or just eating raw.

With the Sixers young core and some strong bench pieces rounding into form, why load up more young is who will need time to adjust and will peak right after we need to extend existing contracts?

Three tanker trucks arrive here on peak production days, loading up with 500 barrels of oil made from 270 tons of turkey guts and 20 tons of pig fat.

He was the first man ever to climb the peak with a loaded 165 lb barbell on his back!!!

Erezan Xtreme is a natural testosterone booster loaded with essential ingredients to keep you at peak performance.

Comparing the power clean with the jump squat using the same absolute loads, MacKenzie et al. (2014) reported that peak GRF was greater in the power clean.

Exploring the effects of training variables, Bryanton et al. (2012) and Cotter et al. (2013) found that peak knee extensor moments increased with increasing depth (albeit with the same absolute loads).

The jump shrug displays highest peak power outputs, peak velocity, peak joint angular velocities, peak vertical displacement, and peak landing forces with low loads (30 — 40 % of 1RM hang power clean).

Enoka (1988) explored hip, knee and ankle joint power outputs in competitive weightlifters during the first pull and transition phases and reported that joint peak power output did not alter with increasing load at the hip, knee or ankle.

Comparing squat variations, Russell and Phillips (1989) reported that peak hip extensor moments were greater during the back squat than in the front squat, even when each variation was performed to a standardized depth and with the same relative load.

Similarly, Comfort et al. (2013) compared the power clean performed with 60 — 80 % of 1RM in untrained female athletes and found no differences in peak power output within this range of loads.

Orloff et al. (1997) reported that experienced lifters displayed lower peak hip extensor moments than inexperienced lifters during squats with the same absolute loads.

Peak GRF was greatest with the highest load: 90 % of 1RM.

In the snatch lift as performed in competition, peak vertical bar velocity can reach 2.1 m / s (Garhammer, 1985; Okada et al. 2011) and the second pull is the fastest phase of the lift (Campos et al. 2006; Harbili, 2012; Korkmaz & Harbili, 2012; Akkuş, 2012; Harbili & Alptekin, 2014; Harbili, 2015), although peak vertical bar velocity is even higher with sub-maximal loads (Hadi et al. 2012).

The load at which peak power is achieved differs by exercise variation and is greatest with the heaviest loads in the power clean, moderate - to - heavy loads in the hang power clean and push press, moderate - to - light loads in the high pull, hang high pull and mid-thigh pull, and light loads in the jump shrug.

The highest peak linear velocity and joint angular velocities are achieved with the lightest loads.

Although peak velocity is less well - studied, linear barbell velocity reduces with increasing load (Suchomel et al. 2014a), as do the angular velocities of the hip, knee and ankle joints (Suchomel et al. 2014e).

The high pull and hang high pull displays the highest peak velocity with low loads (30 % of 1RM hang power clean), the highest force with high loads (80 % of 1RM hang power clean), and the highest peak power with moderate loads (45 % of 1RM hang power clean).

Comparing the back squat with sled pulling, Okkonen and Häkkinen (2013) reported that peak ground reaction forces with 70 % of half squat 1RM were greater than during either block starts or sled pulling with loads of 10 % or 20 % of bodyweight.

Peak force and peak power output increase with increasing load, but RFD does Peak force and peak power output increase with increasing load, but RFD does peak power output increase with increasing load, but RFD does not.

Bryanton et al. (2012) found that peak hip extensor moments increased with increasing depth (albeit with the same absolute loads) but Wretenberg et al. (1996) reported that peak hip extensor moments during both powerlifting squats and during Olympic weightlifting - style squats did not differ substantially between deep and parallel versions (deep = maximal knee flexion vs. parallel = posterior of the hamstrings parallel to the ground).

This suggests that light loads in the mid-thigh pull are best for maximising power outputs, while heavy loads are best for maximising peak force production, as with many other weightlifting derivatives.

They found that peak power, peak bar velocity, and maximum bar displacement occurred with the lowest load tested (40 % of 1RM power clean) while peak force and impulse occurred with the highest load tested (140 % of 1RM power clean).

In a similar study, Suchomel et al. (2013) also found that the jump shrug displayed its greatest peak power output and peak velocity with the lowest load used (30 % of 1RM hang power clean).

Exploring the effects of training variables, Kellis et al. (2005) found that joint angles differed between relative loads but did not identify how the individual hip, knee and ankle joints differed; however, McKean et al. (2010) reported that peak hip angle was more acute with load compared to no load, while both List et al. (2013) and Gomes et al. (2015) reported that peak hip angle became less acute with heavier relative loads.

Only peak hip extension angular velocity is affected by load, being faster with greater weight (Harbili & Alptekin, 2014).

Orloff et al. (1997) assessed the effect of load on peak trunk angle and found that there was no effect with increasing load.

Similarly, Wallace et al. (2002) noted that peak knee extensor moment increased between squats with no load to squats with a barbell load equal to 35 % of bodyweight.

Bryanton et al. (2012) reported that peak knee extensor moments did not increase with increasing relative load (data reported but not analysed directly), but Cotter et al. (2013) noted an increase with increasing load.

Peak GRF is routinely always greatest with the heaviest load (80 — 90 % of 1RM), while peak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extPeak GRF is routinely always greatest with the heaviest load (80 — 90 % of 1RM), while peak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extpeak power output is usually highest at a slightly lower load than the maximal load tested (65 — 80 % of 1RM), and RFD is not generally affected by load to any great extent.

Comparing the effect of exercise variation, Santana et al. (2007) explored the peak muscle activity during the bench press and standing 1 arm cable press with similar relative loads.

As expected, mean concentric velocity and peak concentric velocity decreased with increasing relative load (15 — 90 % of 1RM).

Conventional weight training (using either barbells with just weight plates, or constant - load machines) involves comparatively higher peak forces relative to the percentage of 1RM used, slower bar speeds, and a peak muscle contraction at the start of the concentric phase, where muscle lengths are longest.

The relative load that maximizes peak power appears to be smaller in stronger compared with weaker athletes.

Comparing the effect of training variables, Clark et al. (2008) found that peak force output increased with greater relative load between 55 % and 80 % of 1RM performed on a smith machine using the Plyobrake system.

Greater relative loads and performing the bench press with maximal concentric velocity are associated with greater peak force output.

They found that the straight - leg lift displayed the greatest peak hip extension moment (124Nm), followed by the bent - leg lift with the load far from the body (105Nm), and finally the bent - leg lift with the load close to the body (88Nm).

Test of transfer (long - term): no trials have compared strength training using constant load vs. accommodating resistance on changes in sprinting ability, but if the band or chain resistance was set to produce a peak contract in the half or quarter squat bottom position, it might transfer as well or better than a full squat with constant load if the loading was challenging enough at that joint angle.

In contrast, Schellenberg et al. (2013) found that peak knee net joint moment during the deadlift did not increase with increasing load (from 25 % to 50 % of bodyweight).

The peak knee net joint moment during straight bar deadlifts was lower than during hexagonal bar deadlifts with the same absolute load.

Comparing the deadlift with the good morning, Schellenberg et al. (2013) found that peak L4 - L5 net joint moment during the deadlift was similar during the good morning and the deadlift (using the same absolute load).

Comparing the effects of different training variables, Swinton et al. (2011a) found that there was no difference in peak knee joint angles when using relative loads ranging between 10 — 80 % of 1RM with the straight bar and hexagonal bar deadlifts.

The 2017 Honda Accord Hybrid starts at $ 29,605 for the base Hybrid model and peaks at $ 35,955 for the loaded Touring trim level that I was able to test with its leather trim, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, navigation and more.

The single petrol variant in the 1 series line - up - the BMW 116i comes loaded with a turbocharged 1.6 litre engine that has a maximum power of 136bhp and a peak torque of 220Nm.

Having it operate at it's peak RPM & load all the time with no transmissions saves fuel, as well as recapturing much of the energy when braking; the new Jake Brake would be regenerative braking.