Sentences with phrase «with people on the other side»

Not only do the vast majority of teens surveyed think Americans are divided, but they basically embrace the divide: Three in four «already have a party preference,» and only around 25 percent think they have «a lot in common» with people on the other side of the political aisle.

I've had wonderful conversations with people on the other side of the world, met up in real life:p with local bloggers and instagrammers and immensely enjoyed every single interaction with every one of you.

We can flick through profiles and check boxes of our likes and dislikes in search of instant attraction, but does it actually land a date with the person on the other side of the screen?

With video, you truly get a sense of the person, she said, which helps put daters at ease and helps them make better decisions as to whether they should actually go out with the person on the other side of the screen.

The Internet has brought people together in a way that has never happened before: suddenly you can make contact with people on the other side of the planet if you wish to.

Most of the fake an spam cougar dating sites contain hot and revealing pictures of sexy models but when you eventually meet and interact with the person on the other side, you find that their profile images and misleading and completely different from what they had posted on the site.

The first rule of online dating is to meet before you start developing a connection with the person on the other side of the screen.

At loose ends, Claire meets and instantly bonds with another person on the other side of the velvet rope, a young South Korean film sales associate, Manhee (Kim Minhee).

«We think having [the Portal] in this public / democratic space — our parklands — offers a great platform for discussing all kinds of topics and ideas not only with people on the other side of the world, but also with those a few states over,» says Sabrina Bedford, the Parks Conservancy's Art & Community Engagement Coordinator.

I suggest that this involves not only considering how we interact with those near to us, nor even how we interact with people on the other side of the world, but how we interact with all of life on the planet.

You can't converse with the person on the other side of the camera, nor can you sound the Ring Floodlight Cam's siren if you see something alarming.

It would be great to be able to retrieve video clips, arm / disarm the camera's motion sensor, trigger the onboard siren, speak with the person on the other side of the camera, and perform other tasks with voice commands.

The camera has night vision and two - way audio, so that you can communicate with the person on the other side of the camera.

Social networking has given us a lot in a short period of time — from allowing us to connect with people on the other side of the world to announcing company news quickly and easily.

Not exact matches

A couple of weeks later, 12 people — eight men, four women — sat around a conference table with a moderator, while Carl, our editor, and I looked on from the other side of a two - way mirror.

In other words, if it became — if we stop looking for terrorists and we started looking for people with — on the other side of the aisle.

If you can stimulate the other person's brain with a story, you can, in effect, get that person on your side.

A wise people, seeing the situation for what it truly is, would grapple with these harsh truths, determine a way to stop fighting literally on the other side of the world, and seek a settlement, not as victors, but as an honorable people.

These detours are easier to deal with when you encourage the person on the other side of the table to also smile while finding the right solution.

But we need our Canadian leaders to recognize that this genuine interest and curiosity about the world on the other side of the Pacific needs to be encouraged and validated through more opportunities that allow us to engage with new peoples and cultures.

[16:00] Pain + reflection = progress [16:30] Creating a meritocracy to draw the best out of everybody [18:30] How to raise your probability of being right [18:50] Why we are conditioned to need to be right [19:30] The neuroscience factor [19:50] The habitual and environmental factor [20:20] How to get to the other side [21:20] Great collective decision - making [21:50] The 5 things you need to be successful [21:55] Create audacious goals [22:15] Why you need problems [22:25] Diagnose the problems to determine the root causes [22:50] Determine the design for what you will do about the root causes [23:00] Decide to work with people who are strong where you are weak [23:15] Push through to results [23:20] The loop of success [24:15] Ray's new instinctual approach to failure [24:40] Tony's ritual after every event [25:30] The review that changed Ray's outlook on leadership [27:30] Creating new policies based on fairness and truth [28:00] What people are missing about Ray's culture [29:30] Creating meaningful work and meaningful relationships [30:15] The importance of radical honesty [30:50] Thoughtful disagreement [32:10] Why it was the relationships that changed Ray's life [33:10] Ray's biggest weakness and how he overcame it [34:30] The jungle metaphor [36:00] The dot collector — deciding what to listen to [40:15] The wanting of meritocratic decision - making [41:40] How to see bubbles and busts [42:40] Productivity [43:00] Where we are in the cycle [43:40] What the Fed will do [44:05] We are late in the long - term debt cycle [44:30] Long - term debt is going to be squeezing us [45:00] We have 2 economies [45:30] This year is very similar to 1937 [46:10] The top tenth of the top 1 % of wealth = bottom 90 % combined [46:25] How this creates populism [47:00] The economy for the bottom 60 % isn't growing [48:20] If you look at averages, the country is in a bind [49:10] What are the overarching principles that bind us together?

The argument asking weather Islam is or can be a tolerant religion where people of this faith can live side by side with Christians, Jews, Hindu's and other religions co-exist in America is on the minds of most Americans.

The family is where it's at and those are the people who will be with you when you pass over and those are the ones who will meet you on the other side to welcome you home!

crazy that when i was watching the news it had a split screen with 1 guy saying the buried him with all the muslim traditions to show respect to islam and on the other side of the screen it had people singing na na na na hey hey hey goodbye!!!

It often seems as the «share» the details of this relationship that Jesus is more like a child's imaginary friend who is always on their side when any conflict occurs with others rather than the Jesus who loved people enough to tell them, without accusing or withdrawing affection, the hard truths they needed to know to encourge them to make more meaningful choices.

As a recovering christian, 5 years clean and open minded, the truth definitely did set me free - it set me free of the horrors and fear that come with christianity; it allowed me to look at things from all sides (putting the shoe on the other foot so to speak); it allowed me to love more freely and be a better person.

It is adorable though that you have some sympathy for Hitler, I'm sure you're going to fall on the right side of history this time, because for the lat 60 years you've got the shaft, what with the whole wanting to kill people and hating on others.

While most people are firmly in one camp or the other, roughly 3 to 4 out of 10 Americans either sympathized with both sides — or with neither — on issues of whether employers should be required to provide birth control (43 %), transgender people should be able to use the bathroom of their choice (37 %), or businesses should be required to serve same - sex couples (33 %).

The Internet is just one example of this, a computer network allowing next - to - instant access and communication with people, groups and data libraries next door or on the other side of the world.

When giving advice to people regarding their interactions with the homeless, we try to err on the side of safety for people and their families who want to help others.

I think one thing missing today by people on all political sides is the ability and willingness to sit down with each other and have long conversations about deep issues.

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

Matters of belief should be discussed with care and an open view for the thoughts of others on all sides or someday we will live in a society like Pakistan where Ministers get shot for their belief and scharia is forced upon the people.

«Is there anyone so foolish as to believe that there are people living on the other side of the earth with their heels upward and their heads hanging down?»

I may or may not be interacting with other people and at some point find myself upstairs going along a hallway with rooms on both sides, with doors open and as I pass an open doorway I feel some horribly evil force pulling me in.

Young people in particular often visualize their moral problem in some such way as this: on the one side is the ideal life with its purity, its self - forgetfulness, its fine awareness of things invisible, and on the other side are the primitive instincts — pugnacity, egotism, sensuality, the caveman within, and between these two there is an irreconcilable hostility.

Enough with the sensationalist journalism pretending there's some giant Christian vs atheist fight, when reality is the majority of sane people on both sides really couldn't care less what the other side does.

How can people possibly love one another with only one side of their heart but still carrying hate, spite and malice on the other!

On the other side of the door was my friend David sitting at a table, and within that room were hundreds of people all sitting at tables, with food laid out before them, but they hadn't started eating yet.

I might be ecelectic, but what makes me consistent is my belief is something that combines the belief of Scripture with that of Englightenment philosophy: nurturing life is goodness, simply, and helping others to see a model that thinking for ourselves can help heal the world of all past injustices - so that we all learn to WANT to be good... within reason and by our own choice...: you have a society like that, you'll have less injustices, less violence, less money - grubbing by people who hold themselves as representatives of «authority» -(which side are you on, by the way, if you see the world as so divided in such a bipolar reality...?)

These correlated terms — most often non-natively ranked — reveal clearly that domination and destruction of the natural world is inexorably linked with the domination and oppression of the poor, people of color, and all others that fall on the «inferior» side of the correlation.

We may now have more regular and personal contact with someone on the other side of the world than we do with the person living next door.

On the flip side, there are the non-religious people who don't take the time to investigate religion, but just go with whatever Christopher Hitchens says or some other well - known atheist.

On the other side, the fundamentalists and conservative evangelicals have begun to see that Christian atonement and redemption are not merely for individual appropriation in isolation but also take into account the whole person with his / her involvement in society and culture.

And people on both sides of the political aisle are blaming the other for everything wrong with the United States.

I do nt have a problem with other religions, I think people on both sides of the issue need work together and talk about this.

and on the other side is God, saying, «In that day shall Israel be the third with Egypt and with Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth; for that Yahweh of hosts hath blessed them, saying, Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel mine inheritance.»

I just wish people on both sides of the argument could treat each other with some dignity instead of all the vitrol and hate.

I guarantee the reason for them... is not just because the few on one side or the other, are so much smarter... and have the right to classify the other billions of people, convenientlly as idiots... or that all religion is imaginary fairy tales or all science is against God or that any of its truths are not in harmony with a higher concept of God.

On the one side was the utter ruin of the old, sustaining sacred places and customs with which their faith in God had been identified, and on the other side was the competition of the brilliant gods of Babylon, who, according to ancient theory, had proved their reality and power by the ascendency of their peoplOn the one side was the utter ruin of the old, sustaining sacred places and customs with which their faith in God had been identified, and on the other side was the competition of the brilliant gods of Babylon, who, according to ancient theory, had proved their reality and power by the ascendency of their peoplon the other side was the competition of the brilliant gods of Babylon, who, according to ancient theory, had proved their reality and power by the ascendency of their people.