Sentences with phrase «with physical things»

Not that it should pass quickly or slowly, but be only time, be something I live inside and fill with physical things and activities that I can divide it up by, so that it grows distinct to me and does not vanish when I am not looking.
He taught me how to be engaged with physical things.
Baby likes opening and closing, stacking and nesting, filling and emptying, pushing, shaking, squeezing, pouring, hugging, and sorting with a physical thing.

Not exact matches

The swim workout was the hardest physical thing I've ever done, and I once rode a 100 - mile Gran Fondo, with four mountains and 11,000 total feet of climbing, less than five months after I had a heart attack.
«Despite everything that is going on with digital — great penetration by Netflix, by cable in the form of video - on - demand, iTunes and all of those thingsphysical media is still the most popular way of watching a movie in the U.S.,» he says.
He expects that, just as the Internet made digital knowledge searchable and knowable (ask the Sony executives who've been hacked or Google, which has built a $ 364.4 billion market cap on this trend), the Internet of things will make physical information searchable and digital — with all the pros and cons that entails.
The Internet of Things (IoT) is expected to revolutionize and change the way all businesses, governments, and consumers interact with the physical world.
At some point, things need to happen in the physical world, with in - person interaction.
DUBNER: So, to summarize your overall argument about our rise and fall of American growth: would it be an overstatement to say that there was a lot of low - hanging fruit — physical and labor, and all other kinds of fruit that we picked beautifully and ate hungrily, and we did really well with — and that those things, once used up, that kind of gain will never appear again as far as you can see?
But Apple and other Big Tech corporations like Google and Amazon — along with much of Big Pharma and even Starbucks — have avoided paying hundreds of billions of dollars in taxes on their worldwide earnings because they don't mainly sell physical things like cars or refrigerators or television sets that they make here and ship abroad.
All those things are physical and entirely inconsistent with the success of science.
God says, «You can not reduce me to physical things that can be experienced with your senses.
Awareness is not tethered to the physical but relationship with the physical There is no such thing as non existence physically or conceptually Agency of time and space must be outside our subset of existence and predate singularity Our known world is configured to be appear concentric Probability of intelligent life in only 14 billion years is one out of ten to the power of 127 assuming one universe.
Neo-Platonism held, among other things, that the most perfect being was the least physical, and had the least to do with the physical; that the way of salvation necessarily leads from the body, from the earthly - historical, to a realm of pure spirit.
Scientific theory concerns itself with discovering through careful observation the physical»cause s» of things.
The brain abnormacy is physical and inherited, but learning as much as you can about what it is, and having a support group of people to talk to and to see as other peopl dealing with these same things, who overcame them, can «save your life», as it did mine.
Along the way, the scenic view led to discovering some startling things about the complexity of life and interaction with both the physical and supernatural realms.
In his encyclical letter on the importance of St. Thomas» work, Pope Leo also alluded to the Church's need to maintain a deep study of science: «When the Scholastics, following the teaching of the Holy Fathers, everywhere taught throughout their anthropology that the human understanding can only rise to the knowledge of immaterial things by things of sense, nothing could be more useful for the philosopher than to investigate carefully the secrets of Nature, and to be conversant, long and laboriously, with the study of physical science.»
In religious experience, interpreted within process thought, the physical emotions, purposes, desires, and volitions of individuals are fused with conceptual insights into the nature of things for the purpose of transforming the individual, of enlarging his or her experience, and of advancing the creative process whereby new values emerge.
Although unconscious feeling is the stuff of nature for Whitehead, his theory of «appearance» is one of the things which brings home the splendor of his philosophy — and that even as this theory emphasizes the fusion of conceptual feeling with physical nature.
Here are three typical answers: «He is as much a necessity to my spiritual existence as the elements of pure air are to my physical system»; «If I were convinced that there is no God, I fear a sense of loneliness would become intolerable»; «As for any repose, or ability to face life and death with composure, any incentive to be perfect in things hidden from outsiders, any exhilaration in living and trying to do my best — I can not conceive it without the idea of God.»
From the beginning in the garden The Lord God walked with man (Gen 3:8), he taught Adam his first job (Gen 2:15) and these things were done in the flesh (they are physical).
You don't lift weights with your mind, or take a shower with your mind only, you use your body to do physical things.
I choose not to drink mostly because I know my limits, and when I struggle with self - control when it comes to much less addicting things such as sugar, chocolate, snack, etc., I would prefer not to give myself an opportunity to abuse alcohol the way I do other foods since the physical consequences have potential to be very dangerous.
With this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the liWith this method, we have not simply done away with linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the liwith linguistic clutter, we have made the positive assertion that the ultimate «simple» or constituents of things experienced are neither the objects of common sense nor the «scientific» objects of physical theory (electrons, quarks, and the like).
Geometry starts with the purpose of investigating certain forms of physical things.
This «exception» seems to be the only one that has to be dealt with, if we leave out of account the fact that a thorough - going Vitalism, which after all is a doctrine quite commonly supported in Christian philosophy, would have to require a predicamental activity of God within the natural world and its history for the origin of life, too, and perhaps for certain definite categories of living things, unless of course such Vitalism were to hold that there has been «life» in the physical world from the beginning or that a special ratio seminalis of its own for life could have been created into the material world from the beginning.
To Ken Margo: I am totally agree with you about this evil thing going around the earth... this evil minded people is there everywhere regardless of faith... that was not what i was trying to say... my point was to be able to recognize the One True God who is Unseen and who has no partners as He is not in need of any partners but we the creation is in need of Him... thats all... I wish I could do something to stop all these taking place around the earth... I think we human fear the fed laws more than we fear the laws of our Creator, for example not to associate any partner with Him, taking the life of others, drug dealing, human trafficking, believing in hereafter and so on... I remember a story that I was talking with one of my friends... I was telling him look we all obey the law of the land so much like for example when we drive and no one moves even an inch when there is a school bus stop to pick / drop kids as it is a fed laws but when it comes to the laws of our Creator, we don't care... like having physical relationship outside of marriage and many more... then he said something nice... he said that its because we see the consequence of breaking the law of the land but we do not see the punishment of hereafter even though it is mentioned very details in Quran, it even gives pictures of hereafter....
There is a lot of farcical chin - pulling in the book over various «possible candidates for nothingness» and «what «nothing» might actually comprise,» along with an earnest insistence that any «definition» of nothingness must ultimately be «based on empirical evidence» and that ««nothing» is every bit as physical as «something»» — as if «nothingness» were a highly unusual kind of stuff that is more difficult to observe or measure than other things are.
For man has a faculty that can identify itself with the natures of all things, but first of all with the natures of the physical things of the universe.
It does this, with regard to the mind - body problem, by reconciling the truth in Cartesian dualism — that mind and brain are distinct and interact — with the truth in materialist physicalism — that all actual things are physical, so that there is no dualistic interaction.
One thing we know is that Kim will not solve this Kantian problem with a Kantian solution: The idea that theoretical reason deals with a merely apparent world, largely created by mind itself is ruled out by Kim's physicalist assumption that «the world is fundamentally a physical world governed by physical law» (SM xv).
To affirm the existence of minds or souls is not necessarily, as Kim assumes (SM 126), to affirm the existence of things with mental but no physical characteristics.
While people with Down syndrome often do require some extra assistance with things like learning and physical milestones, how does one presume to quantify the quality of someone else's life?
But this is compatible with psychicalism, which asserts, not that all things are or have minds (as the word «panpsychism» may seem literally to connote), but only that all concrete or physical things (a) are minds of some high or low kind, or (b) are composed of minds, and that only active singulars are individually sentient.
With this kind of physical rearrangement must come a reengagement with what I call focal things and practiWith this kind of physical rearrangement must come a reengagement with what I call focal things and practiwith what I call focal things and practices.
Instead when a person marries... he takes his sexual desire, and he does the same thing with it that we must all do with all our physical desires if we would make them means of worship — 1) he brings it into conformity to God's word; 2) he subordinates it to a higher pattern of love and care; 3) he transposes the music of physical pleasure into the music of spiritual worship, 4) he listens for the echoes of God's goodness in every nerve; 5) he seeks to double his pleasure by making her joy his joy; and 6) he gives thanks to God from the bottom of his heart because he knows and he feels that he never deserved one minute of this pleasure.
The world is a world for a prehender, with all the physical connections between things being coordinate divisions of prehensions.
And just as it is impossible in the physical world to know with certainty why a drop of water runs down the right hand side of a knuckle instead of the left hand side, so also, we can never know with absolute certainty why some bad things happen in this world.
No one could, for instance, no matter how fine his eyesight or physical coordination, hit a major - league pitch with a cylindrical bat if there were not some prior attunement on his part to the subtle spiritual force that flows through all things, a sort of Zen cultivation of the mindless mind, in which the impossible is accomplished because it somehow simply accomplishes itself in us.
All these items are part and parcel of appropriate development in poor countries as well, with the addition that they still need to produce more things for food, housing, clothing and the other physical necessities of life.
Our editorial argues, among other things, that the object of modern science is not a radically delimited subset of the physical realm, and thus that scientific methodology, properly understood, is just a part of that exercise of human reason which is ultimately in profound synthetic harmony with faith.
We both accept, I think, these four related things about human knowing: (1) sentient experience of «physical things» is intrinsically infused with objective meaning, purposefulness and value; (2) flowing out, of this and intertwined with it is, at least for humans, «cognition» of the physical, and moral experience of such value; (3) this moral experience and engagement reveals the spiritual realm as something foundational to and «abstractly distinguishable» from the physical realm — values for Ward, mind for me; and (4) one piece of evidence for making such a distinction is the uniquely «publicly....
This of course allows things to have properties that are nonphysical, perhaps, certain physical aggregates with a high degree of systemic unity and organizational complexity, such as biological organisms and computing machines, may exhibit nonphysical properties.
The human species, the only one with a spiritual soul, is, as fulfilled by the Incarnation, the purpose of creation in our theology, The breakdown of the individual physical thing is part of the dynamic of evolution across time as it aims at its goal.
Well, it is still in these richer animistic and dramatic aspects that religion delights to dwell, It is the terror and beauty of phenomena, the «promise» of the dawn and of the rainbow, the «voice» of the thunder, the «gentleness» of the summer rain, the «sublimity» of the stars, and not the physical laws which these things follow, by which the religious mind still continues to be most impressed; and just as of yore, the devout man tells you that in the solitude of his room or of the fields he still feels the divine presence, that inflowings of help come in reply to his prayers, and that sacrifices to this unseen reality fill him with security and peace.
I had a similar experience with gluten, it helped my ankle pain, I have fibromyalgia, physical therapy is helping, but the gluten free thing REALLY helped my joint pain.
As the eating habits of Americans face increasing scrutiny, one thing is clear: a nutritious diet is a key factor contributing to good health along with regular physical activity and a healthy lifestyle.
This dutch guy IS a proven goalscorer yes he IS good in the air he does have a physical presence yes he is good in his current league, BUUUUT, the league he plays in is a league far below the standard of the PL and as was proven with Giroud (who in my opinion is NOT up to this standard) the transition is an unqualified thing, when you bring in a player from a league that is of a lower standard more often than not the player fails.
* Playing Theo is the hardest thing to watch, would rather gamble with Neilson * The Ox would do a better job than Bellerin at RWB * Kola should be playing LWB * Ramsey is a different player when he starts & being an impact sub * Giroud & Laca should start together especially physical (away) games * Ozil is good but... well maybe should rotate with Iwobi * Xhaka should work on reducing costly errors * can't trust Monreal, seems like a target for our opponents wherever he plays they wan na go thru him!!!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z