Sentences with phrase «with profits per equity partner»

Berrymans Lace Mawer has announced double - digit increases in both revenues and profits, with profits per equity partner (PEP) soaring upwards by 32 %.

Olswang and pre-merger Berrymans Lace Mawer have each grown their revenues for 2013 - 14, with profits per equity partner (PEP) at the former expected to dip by nearly 4 %.

with profits per equity partner (PEP) inching up 2.7 % to $ 1.5 m (# 950,000).

Cooley sees revenue climb 19 % as Mayer Brown posts 7 % rise to $ 1.2 bn, with profit per equity partner increasing 13 % to $ 1.44 m

Gateley has reported a significant hike in profits with profit per equity partner (PEP) soaring by 22 % while revenue also climbed 7 % during the 2012 - 13 financial year.

Murphy argues that a fascination with profit per equity partner and short - term decision making is potentially putting some law firms at risk.

DAC Beachcroft has posted rising turnover and profitability for the 2016 - 17 financial year, with profit per equity partner (PEP) rising to a new record high.

Still, the firm remains a highly profitable place, with profit per equity partner up slightly this year to $ 1.11 m (# 861,000) and London newly qualified solicitor pay jumping a chunky # 7k to # 70,000.

This year all that discipline has paid off with profit per equity partner soaring by 20 % to reach # 432,000.

Not exact matches

Profit per equity partner (PEP) rose by 63.8 % at legacy Lawrence Graham in the firm's 2013 - 14 financial results, prior to the merger with Wragges & Co which went live on 1 May this year.

Data from Legal Week «s UK Top 50 and The American Lawyer «s Global 100 rankings shows that the 10 largest UK firms by revenue have increased profit per equity partner (PEP) by an average of 15.7 % during the last five years, compared with 24.7 % across the 10 largest US firms.

The ongoing spat around the value - or otherwise - of firms reporting profit per equity partner (PEP) shows no sign of abating, with a stream of industry leaders weighing in on the debate.

Profit per equity partner (PEP) rose by 63.8 % at legacy Lawrence Graham in the firm's 2013 - 14 financial year, prior to the merger with Wragge & Co which went live on 1 May this year.

DWF has broken through the # 200m barrier with revenue growth of 7.6 % against a 9.8 % drop in profit per equity partner (PEP).

Kirkland & Ellis had a 2016 to remember, with revenue rising 15 % to $ 2.65 bn (# 2.12 bn) and profit per equity partner (PEP) passing the $ 4m mark.

Macfarlanes defied the depressed UK and European markets this year to record its second set of strong financial results in a row, with revenue up by 11.6 % and profits per equity partner (PEP) increasing by 9.5 % for 2012 - 13.

Dundas & Wilson has reported significant fall key financial metrics with turnover down 11 %, net profit down 21 % and profits per equity partner plunging 22 %.

Stephenson Harwood's average profit per equity partner (PEP) fell 8.5 % to # 708,000 in 2016 - 17, with the dip coming against an 11 % rise in revenue to # 176m.

Allen & Overy (A&O) has eclipsed its peers with double - digit growth in both revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) that outstrips its closest rivals by some distance.

Braithwaite has overseen a solid period of growth during his ten - year tenure as managing partner with the firm recording a 14 % rise in average profits per equity partner last year to hit # 366,000, with the firm's fee income standing at # 56m.

Weil Gotshal & Manges enjoyed a record year in 2017, with revenue reaching new heights, profits per equity partner (PEP) seeing double - digit growth and London turnover surging by 33 %.

The UK's leading law firms have struggled to match significant hikes in revenue with similar profitability increases during the past five years, with Legal Week research showing that 30 % of the UK top 50 have lower profits per equity partner (PEP) now than they did in 2011 - 12.

LG has posted a 26 % drop in profits per equity partner (PEP) for 2011 - 12, with revenue also fallng for a second consecutive year.

Braithwaite has overseen a solid period of growth during his tenure as managing partner with the firm recording a 14 % rise in average profits per equity partner last year to hit # 366,000, with the firm's fee income standing at # 56m.

But that average gain of 1.2 %, coupled with similar increases in revenue per lawyer and profits per equity partner, masked some weakness in many firms» results.

Maclays also demonstrated further growth in its 2006 - 07 results with average profits per equity partner breaking the # 300k barrier, rising by 15 % from # 275,000 last year to # 315,000 this year, while Brodies announced a turnover rise of 43 % to # 30m and gross profits up 33 % to # 11.6 m.

The City firm took in fee income of # 57.5 m for the last financial year, broadly in line with the 2011 - 12 figure of # 57.6 m, while profits per equity partner (PEP) fell 3 % from # 303,000 to # 293,000.

Berrymans Lace Mawer has announced its 2011 - 12 financial results, with turnover climbing by 3 % against a 15 % drop in profits per equity partner (PEP).

Insurance and shipping firms have once again outpaced the UK top 50, with the firms seeing both revenues and profits per equity partner (PEP) increase by an average of 10.3 %.

Watson Farley & Williams has strengthened its London office with the addition of two partners from US law firms, in the wake of a strong 2016 - 17 for the firm which is expected to result in profit per equity partner (PEP) rising by at least 25 %.

Ashurst has posted falling revenue and profit per equity partner (PEP) for the second year running, with PEP falling to an 11 - year low.

Nabarro has also been doing well financially, with revenues up again this year after a stonking 2015 which saw profit per equity partner soar 21 %.

In this period the firm's revenue and profits have jumped by 40 %, with the journey capped last summer as profit per equity partner surpassed the # 1 million mark for the first time.

The global firm has had a good year, with revenue up 6 % to just shy of the billion dollar mark — underlining just how big this business is — and profit per equity partner jumping 15 % to reach $ 670,000 (# 537,000).

Offering one of the best combinations of scale and quality outside the magic circle — with revenue last year of a whopping # 1.53 billion and global profit per equity partner at nearly # 1 million (the UK figure is # 760,464)-- Hogan Lovells specialises in about every practice area you can imagine.

With firms slavishly compete on profit per equity partner paradigm in league tables, most BigLaw leaders are so consumed by their firms» standings that all decisions are made in the pursuit of profit today.

The importance of leading the local market on trainee and junior lawyer salaries will have to be balanced with the fact that Burges Salmon has been feeling a bit more pressure of late amid a small decline in revenue from # 87.4 million to # 87 million and a 16 % drop in profit per equity partner from # 523,000 to # 438,000 in what managing partner Peter Morris has described as a «challenging» financial year.

The happy internal mood corresponds with robust recent financial performance; profit per equity partner rose by 14 % to # 625,000 this year and overall revenue went up 11 % to # 423 million.

Weightmans has boosted profit per equity partner (PEP) by 18.5 % as revenues hold steady, following a financial year that saw failed merger talks with Newcastle - based Ward Hadaway.

Burges Salmon has posted improved figures for both revenue and profits per equity partner (PEP) for the 2012 - 13 financial year, with increases of 4 % and 1 % respectively.

It's been a good year for Allen & Overy, with the firm topping the magic circle financial results growth league to boost profit per equity partner (PEP) by a whopping 26 % to # 1.51 million while lifting revenue by 16 % to # 1.52 billion.

Profit is distributed to equity partners (EP) in proportion with their share of the equity points (Points), giving rise to an average profit per point, PPEP (if the denominator is the number of EPs, rather than points on issue, then PPEP refers to the average profit peProfit is distributed to equity partners (EP) in proportion with their share of the equity points (Points), giving rise to an average profit per point, PPEP (if the denominator is the number of EPs, rather than points on issue, then PPEP refers to the average profit peprofit per point, PPEP (if the denominator is the number of EPs, rather than points on issue, then PPEP refers to the average profit peprofit per EP).