Sentences with phrase «with public opinion where»

Not exact matches

Sina's Weibo is one of the most popular social media networks where users can interact with strangers and voice opinions on issues on a visible public platform.

Here's a letter to the board of Biglari Holdings re: executive compensation [Noise Free Investing] & then more thoughts on Biglari's compensation agreement [My Investing Notebook] Where things stand in the market [Bespoke Investment Group] A list of stocks Nasdaq is canceling trades in from yesterday's madness [Business Insider] The best interest rate chart in the world [Trader's Narrative] A great macro overview from Barry Ritholtz [The Big Picture] A look at John Paulson's possible ownership of Bear Stearns CDOs [Zero Hedge] John Mauldin on the future of public debt [Advisor Perspectives] Top buys & sells from Morningstar's ultimate stock pickers [Morningstar] The truth about «Sell in May & Go Away» [WSJ] An interview with hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry [Investment Week] Bill Ackman: Let's have a public registry for stock opinion [Barron's] Hedge fund Harbinger hires ex-Orange chief for wireless plan [Dealbook] & Deutsche Telekom has been in talks with Harbinger [FT] Hedge funds begin to restructure fee system [FT]

If you are that sensitive, don't go out in public where you might run into someone with a differing opinion.

We may well ask ourselves where we would have stood with reference to Calvary — below the average, with the outlaws, condemned by the general body of public opinion; on the average with the multitude, whose organized public opinion slew alike robbers and Christ; or above the average, with Christ himself.

If we start this season with those two in our starting 11 it will be a clear sign from this organization that nothing has changed and that we will never get it right until both Kroenke and Wenger are gone... neither one of these players should still be with our club at this point because they represent the settling half - measures that have plagued this team for a number of years... this is what I call the «no man's land» of the soccer world, where teams don't have enough talented young players, unlike a Monaco or Dortmund, because they have lost the plot from an organizational standpoint... they are so reliant on one individual to run the whole operation that their once relevant scouting department has become so antiquated that it can no longer find those hidden gems it once had... furthermore, when you leave all decision - making to a manager who despises any dissenting opinions, your management team becomes little more than a stagnant group of «yes men» and no new ideas emerge... so instead of developing a team with the qualities necessary to excel in a particular system, you continually make half - brain purchases year after year to stifle dissent from the ticket - buying public, then try desperately to finagle together a lineup regardless of what would make positional sense... have you ever heard of a team who plays players out of position so often... of course not because that manager would likely be fired and never work for a team of any consequence ever again

But if, back at the beginning of the season, you'd asked yourself where Arsenal would be as February began, you'd have answered «about fourth, having been a bit higher, coming off the back of a quiet transfer window and a disappointing result at home, with tricky away games to come, and with the pendulum of public opinion just starting to make its way back from «finest team the world has ever seen'to «thank you, Arsène, but it's time to go.»»

Surveys of public opinion indicate that Germans by and large are satisfied with their health care system (as opposed to the U.S. where a large portion of the population thinks that system needs substantial changes).

«Where, in the context of a major reform, government announcements are so markedly at odds with current opinion in the relatively informed and serious media, there is a particularly strong public interest in up - to - date information as to the details of what is happening within the programme, so that the public may judge whether or not opposition and media criticism is well — founded.

Complimenting the disorder of the Senate the whole time was the unassailable lethargy of the Assembly, where Ent - like speaker Sheldon Silver controls a Democratic supermajority that is seemingly impervious to public opinion, editorial outrage and, as Eliot Spitzer can unhappily attest, governors with «popular mandates.»

Meanwhile back here on planet Earth; where no one, (not even someone such as myself with a lifelong interest in politics,) has ever heard of either Jeremy Corbyn or Angela Eagle much before last week, the Ivory tower jibe chimes very much in tune with my own previous assessment of a now all but completely defunct Labor party completely out of touch with the public at large and with broader opinion, and out to lunch.

By way of clarification, a push poll is not a poll at all but rather, as detailed by the American Association of Public Opinion Research, a political telemarketing technique where telephone calls are used to canvass the electorate, providing them with inaccurate information in the guise of a poll.

Clarke clarified that he said they should have costed it but he did not say he disagreed with it, so where does that put Kenneth Clarke on the side of public opinion especially when he has also said David Cameron's policy on Europe is a «headbanging» policy, and that despicable insult is also in contrast to public opinion.

That white paper could form the basis for coherent public debate and reflection, along with Web sites where outside experts would be invited to share opinions accessible to the public.

There is also a public forum where people can exchange opinions and experiences with each other.

But regardless of where anyone once stood, there's no mistaking how much a single trailer with simple but effective editing — coupled with worthy dialogue thanks to Chris Terrio's rewrites — has swayed public opinion in a flash.

In my opinion deal with climate denialists this way, especially in public forums where other people are watching.

The Climate Reality Project, a group overseen by Al Gore, is trying to win over public opinion by getting people to spread accurate global warming science in the comment sections of news stories online, where the battle rages with particular ferocity.

But all I've found is endless problems with the accusation... and where the true influence of the issue regarding public opinion of skeptic climate scientists is apparently seen.

I remember exchanging comments with Willis on more than one occasion, where I explained to him that his confidence in his theory of attribution for public opinion on climate change seemed ill - founded.

In most areas extreme care in the wording of an issue is not that critical, but with something as important and politically charged as climate change where there are powerful interests determined to make sure nothing changes and who freely manipulate public opinion through corporate outlets every word, every turn of a phrase, every nuance needs to be carefully considered.

(2) The Minister may give directions in accordance with subsection (3) where the Minister is of the opinion that it is in the best interest of the public to do so and,

In effect, this case can be read as tacit acceptance of AG Cruz Villalón in his Opinion in Fransson, who proposed that the oversight by the Court of the exercise of public authority by the Member States be limited to those cases where there was «a specific interest of the Union in ensuring that that exercise of public authority accords with the interpretation of the fundamental rights by the Union».

Moreover, doctrinal entrenchment is particularly problematic in the FISA courts, where secrecy and institutional context indicate that outside efforts at doctrinal reform are less likely to be effective than they are with courts that publish their opinions.35 Unlike published opinions, secret opinions can not provoke the public into lobbying for a legislative override36 or judicial overruling37 — two important paths of legal reform.38 Perhaps to hedge against the risks of limited external oversight, FISA limits FISC and Court of Review judges to non-renewable, seven - year terms, 39 a provision suggesting that Congress envisioned a FISA court whose membership would be responsive to shifting factual circumstances and policy priorities.40 Stare decisis, which requires judges to adhere to interpretations of law that they might otherwise reject as unjust or unpersuasive, constrains these judges» ability to adapt to such factual and policy shifts.

Lawyers are precluded under their codes of professional conduct from recording conversations with clients and other lawyers without informing them, but in a situation analogous to Shepherd's — where there is bullying, harassment, misrepresentation of the law and a power imbalance among parties — I'd be very tempted to record it anyway and take my chances with a discipline panel, the Court of Appeal and the court of public opinion.

The classic definition of confidentiality remains that of Lord Goff in the Spycatcher case (above) in which he stated his opinion «that a duty of confidence arises when confidential information comes to the knowledge of a person (the confidant) in circumstances where he has notice, or is held to have agreed, that the information is confidential, with the effect that it would be just in all the circumstances that he should be precluded from disclosing the information to others... The existence of this broad general principle reflects the fact that there is such a public interest in the maintenance of confidences, that the law will provide remedies for their protection».

Circumstances will arise where the lawyer should have no contact with the media and other cases where the lawyer is under a specific duty to contact the media to properly serve the client — the latter situation will arise more often in the context of administrative boards and tribunals where a particular tribunal is an instrument of government policy and hence is susceptible to public opinion.

Looking at the problem from a purely ORE in - house perspective, I totally agree with your opinion; where / how else in this country does a «profession» allow for its governing bodies to enforcibly suck money from its soon - to - be-failures, all the while exposing the ignorant, thus misinformed consuming public to those «amateurs» masquerading as «professionals»?

He says that in his opinion, the consent agreement led to «a rift between CREA and the real estate boards; undue hardships on real estate sales associates, a change in commission structures that reduced or eliminated what I perceive as essential services to clients; the appearance of «mere listing» options where the buyer's agents now have to take an extra step and negotiate their own commissions with a seller prior to presenting the offer; and last but not least, the «opening» of the MLS information, which Realtors pay for, making it fully available to the public.»