Not exact matches
Further, in any such dispute, under no circumstances will participant be permitted to obtain
awards for, and hereby waives all rights to claim
punitive, incidental, or consequential
damages, including reasonable attorneys» fees, other than participant's actual out - of - pocket expenses (i.e. costs associated
with entering this Giveaway), and participant further waives all rights to have
damages multiplied or increased.
Netflix's latest documentary, Nobody Speak: Trials of the Free Press, was often colloquially referred to as the «Hulk Hogan» documentary which led many to believe that the sole focus of the film would center on the wrestler's legal entanglement
with Gawker — which ultimately led to the news portal being bankrupted and shuttered after a Florida judge
awarded Hogan $ 115 million in
punitive damages.
Neither the World Photography Organisation, nor any other party involved in creating, producing, or delivering the Site, nor any naming right sponsors, event sponsors and third parties affiliated
with the World Photography
Awards and the World Photography Organisation («Event Partners») shall be liable for any direct, incidental, consequential, indirect, or
punitive damages arising out of Your access to, or use of, or browsing the Site, or downloading of any materials, data, text images, video, or audio from the Site, including, without limitation,
damage to, or viruses that may infect, Your computer equipment or other property as a result thereof.
Further, in any such dispute, under no circumstances shall participant be permitted to obtain
awards for, and hereby waives all rights to,
punitive, incidental, or consequential
damages, including reasonable attorney's fees, other than participant's actual out - of - pocket expenses (i.e. costs associated
with entering this Campaign).
Canadian courts have so far enforced US judgments
with damage awards far larger than the value of the transaction — though none (so far as I know)
with a really astronomical jury - chosen
punitive element.
672, 596 A. 2d 687 (1991), the court nevertheless declined to «interpret Haslip to hold that an
award of
punitive damages, to comport
with the requirements of the Due Process Clause, always must be subject to a form of post-verdict or appellate review that includes the possibility of remittitur.»
In the case before us today we are not directly concerned
with the character of the standard that will identify unconstitutionally excessive
awards; rather, we are confronted
with the question of what procedures are necessary to ensure that
punitive damages are not imposed in an arbitrary manner.
We granted certiorari, 510 U. S. 1068 (1994), to consider whether Oregon's limited judicial review of the size of
punitive damages awards is consistent
with our decision in Has lip.
With an
award of $ 5 million in
punitive damages, the jury evidently sought to punish the owner of the...
However, you may be entitled to an
award of
punitive damages if the defendant acted
with malice, fraud, or oppression.
«There are already some insurers that have been hit
with two or three
punitive damages awards.
In the 2003 - 13 data,
punitive damages were
awarded to human plaintiffs 20 % of the time (in 28/143 cases)
with an average
award of $ 6,593.
Thus far I have been considering only total
damages awards, but some interesting trends are worth noting
with regard to general, aggravated,
punitive and special
damages.
Another significant and surprising finding
with regard to
damages to corporations is that in the 2003 - 13 data,
punitive damages were
awarded to corporations much more often, and in much higher amounts, than to human plaintiffs.
According to the jury,
punitive damages were
awarded because the big rig driver was provided
with inadequate training and the transport company that operated the truck had a history of safety violations.
Therefore,
punitive damages are «recoverable for a tort committed in connection
with, but independently of, the breach of contract, where the essentials of the
award of such
damages are otherwise present, the allowance of such
damages being for the tort and not for the breach of contract.»
Punitive damages may be
awarded when the behavior of the person that injured the victim was willful or
with a reckless disregard for the high likelihood of harm.
Kwinter helped secure the largest jury
award in the province's history for
punitive damages against an insurer in the 2006 case Pereira v. Hamilton Township Farmers» Mutual Fire Insurance Co.,
with his clients ordered to receive $ 2.5 million.
With the help of her Illinois injury attorney, Dora Jablonski was
awarded $ 23 million for her own injuries, $ 5 million for wrongful death of her husband and $ 15 million in
punitive damages.
If a case does, in fact, qualify for
punitive damages, the jury will
award punitive damages in accordance
with the jury instructions.
Punitive damages may be
awarded when the behavior of the person that injured the victim was fraudulent, malicious, oppressive, or
with reckless disregard of the high likelihood of harm.
To the degree profit disgorgement were to be ordered without a corresponding loss, the
award would arguably conflict
with Canada's rules limiting
punitive damages [see Whiten v. Pilot Insurance Co., [2002] 1 S.C.R. 595, 2002 SCC 18].
The mammoth statutory
damages award, coupled
with the levy of
punitive damages, sends a strong signal that Canadian courts are willing to protect and enforce owners» rights and punish those who take steps to circumvent these protective measures.
With this decison, the Ontario Court of Appeal specifically acknowledged the appropriateness of
punitive damages awards against employers who discriminate, harass or fail to accommodate disabled employees.
Punitive damages were
awarded in the amount of $ 25,000 because the Bank's conduct found to be was oppressive and high - handed when it blacklisted the plaintiff's relatives and in unlawfully and improperly deducted funds from the plaintiff's account
with another bank in respect of her outstanding loans from the Bank.
The decision in Gordon v Altus is another example of the noticeable trend in recent years for courts to
award significant
punitive damage awards in situations where an employer has acted in a malicious manner in the way in which in deals
with its former employees.
If you are involved in an accident
with a drunk driver you should be entitled to an
award of
punitive damages even if you only incur property
damage and certainly if there are personal injuries involved.
For the record, I am comfortable
with some judicial regulation of extreme
punitive damages awards.
Altus Group Ltd. now faces the prospect of not only paying a $ 100,000.00
punitive damage award, wrongful dismissal
damages and Gordon's legal costs but also dealing
with the reputational
damage of having been publicly punished for having engaged in a highly unethical business practice.
The availability of an increased
punitive damage award in a wrongful dismissal action because of a bad faith employer policy was recognized in Hodson v. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.2 The Divisional Court considered an appeal of an order striking paragraphs in the plaintiff's statement of claim that alleged that the Bank had an ongoing corporate strategy of terminating employees for cause to avoid having to provide unwanted employees
with a severance package.
The
punitive damage award was knocked back to $ 5 million, still leaving the plaintiff
with a nearly $ 18 million verdict.
The judge ordered the defendants to pay the legal costs incurred by Senator Enverga, along
with the general and aggravated
damages and
punitive damages awarded, thus bringing the total amount to which the Senator is entitled to $ 340,000 plus pre-judgment interest.
Suffice to say, the jury was not happy
with Exxon,
awarding $ 12 million in compensatory
damages, $ 12.5 million in
punitive damages and nearly a half a million in medical
damages.
If one of the drivers acted
with extreme recklessness or malice,
punitive damages may also be
awarded.
Category I
punitive damages may be
awarded when the behavior of the person that injured the victim was
with reckless disregard to the likelihood of harm.
Taking a case completely to trial is often done in only the most egregious accident cases because it gives a sympathetic jury an opportunity to
award punitive damages along
with compensatory claims, especially when an accident involved a drunk driver or speeding driver or a commercial vehicle.
Most U.S. states allow for an
award of
punitive damages in connection
with an intentional tort (statutes of limitations and pre-judgment interest
award rules vary greatly).
With regard to remedies, the analytics show that
punitive damages were
awarded in only 192 employment cases and attorneys» fees in just 437 cases.
Justice Stinson
awarded $ 50,000 in compensatory
damages, $ 25,000 in aggravated
damages and a further $ 25,000 in
punitive damages along
with interest and costs.
Fortunately, the CADA amendments will provide caps on compensatory and
punitive damage awards (also similar to Title VII, and incorporating the limits of Title VII for employers
with 15 or more employees):
He made this decision based on the fact that the insurer had denied the benefits for six years in order to delay payment to take advantage of the insured's economic vulnerability.5 Moreover, the claims advisor for the defendant took an adversarial approach and did not deal
with the claim fairly and in a balanced way.6 As such, the insurer was deemed to have acted in bad faith and the plaintiff was
awarded $ 200,000 in
punitive damages.
The Ontario Court of Appeal did not interfere
with the decision of the trial judge to
award punitive damages.
Punitive damages —
Punitive damages are
damages awarded with the intent to punish the person or company that caused the
damage rather than compensate the injured victim.
Of course,
punitive damages are typically
awarded with compensatory
damages for the actual losses suffered by the person who died, his or her estate, and his or her loved ones.
Say you've been
awarded punitive damages: the state will take 70 % of that, and your lawyer will usually get about 20 %, leaving you
with only 10 %.
Now businesses can face lawsuits
with unlimited
punitive damages and civil injury lawsuits after the Missouri Supreme Court struck down a $ 500,000 limit on
awards in September 2014, two years after striking down other limits for medical - malpractice
awards.
The jury had decided the case in favor of plaintiff, who alleged negligence, negligence per se and intentional infliction of emotional distress, concluding also that defendant nursing home had acted
with reckless disregard for the rights of others, resulting in a $ 10,000
punitive damage award tacked onto the $ 1.2 million in compensatory
damages.
Of note
with respect to the issue of
damages is that the court declined to
award punitive damages, notwithstanding Justice Boswell's finding, in paragraph 23 of his reasons for decision, that, «Mr. Dewji's conduct, as the sole director and officer of the defendant corporations, was oppressive, high - handed, callous and unfairly prejudicial to the rights and interests of the plaintiffs.»
A judge or jury will typically
award punitive damages if the defendant acted
with fraud, malice, or willful or wanton misconduct.
If they acted
with oppression, fraud, or malice, you may be entitled to recover an
award of
punitive damages.