Sentences with phrase «with real belief»

We are independently owned and managed with a real belief that the service we provide to our clients and candidates is more important than making sales calls so we have given...

Unlike our games versus Sunderland & Stoke, Arsenal started off at Anfield with real belief and enthusiasm.

More than that, I want to see an Arsene Wenger in control of things, with real belief and enthusiasm.

So perhaps the Gunners can approach this big EPL game with real belief and remember that apart from the Chelsea game and the ridiculous refereeing of Mike Dean, Arsenal have not lost since the opening day and are in a good position to make a real challenge for the title.

Attitudes are closely related with real beliefs, and these are in turn affected by, although not identical with, ostensible beliefs.

Not exact matches

«There are real shortcomings in how American politics are covered, including pervasive groupthink among media elites, an unhealthy obsession with the insider's view of politics, a lack of analytical rigor, a failure to appreciate uncertainty, a sluggishness to self - correct when new evidence contradicts pre-existing beliefs, and a narrow viewpoint that lacks perspective.»

«Any time you look at any kind of real life piece of text or utterance that one human wrote or said to another human, it's filled with analogies, modal logic, belief, expectation, fear, nested modals, lots of variables and quantifiers,» Lenat said.

If you want to raise kids with real grit, this same science shows, the right approach is to foster «a growth mindset,» or a belief that our mental capabilities aren't fixed and can grow with effort.

Being a real influencer means being willing to be disliked and having beliefs not everyone agrees with.

Hughes had his own revelation: Obama's belief in the power of real people to be agents of change dovetailed with his own.

And they share their belief that if you want real wealth in your life, you have to cultivate joy, surround yourself with people that make you better, and always find a way to give back.

As illustrated by the rolling correlation, an investor operating in real time with inception - to - date data may develop different, dynamic beliefs.

This is shocking to me as a dismal oversight, but it represents the inaccurate and antiquated — but frustratingly persistent — belief that flexible work is more of a perk to employees than a business strategy with very real benefits to employers.

But somehow equating that belief with the real physical danger of playing on the freeway... means that «belief» has gotten an inordinate place in life.

It's only in the last century that people have tried to make the Bible fit their beliefs rather then align their life with what the bible says, and look at the results, the world is in turmoil and on a downward spiral out of control and this article is a good example of trying to make God's word an excuse to do every wrong thing there is real good reporting.

These beliefs are apparently the ones set forth by Messrs. Johnson, Hoge, and Luidens in «Mainline Churches: The Real Reason for Decline» (FT, March 1993): (1) That Christianity is the only religion with a valid claim to truth, (2) that persons can be saved only through Jesus Christ and otherwise go to hell, and (3) that therefore one should try to convert others to the Christian faith.

And in the nicest possible way, this is what you are doing ALREADY... you are trying to «spin» this story and to «justify» it to fit with your current belief schema instead of just recognizing the overly obvious that it isn't real.

We want our leaders to be real, even if we don't agree with personal belief systems.

If an adult continued with these beliefs despite the real world around them and education, then we would have to say they are either suffering from a mental illness or delusional.

Cioran seems to be on their side with his belief that «there is no freedom, no «real life» without an apprenticeship in dispossession.»

Snowboarder The fact mankind since the beginning of recorded history has filled that great unknown with belief (or unbelief) based on faith without proof makes «The Real One» self evident.

It's concession by rewriting history, claiming no conflict with science by denying that the exposed belief was never literal / relevant / real.

All of the things that have come out about it's REAL temple beliefs and godhood, etc, will hit Americans and they will put it up there with the likes of David Koresh.

I repeat: I hope I am wrong; but I am, all the same, beginning to wonder if the warm support with which even quite unexpected people in our hierarchy (like Bishop Hollis) greeted the establishment of the Ordinariate this time round (you will remember the hostility with which they squashed a similar but less radical basic idea in the Nineties) was really as wholehearted as it seemed at the time: or were they simply saying what they knew the Pope wanted them to say, but without any real belief in the idea itself?

I don't think the metaphysical Jesus that Paul claims to have encountered (in a vision) was real, or that he was the same Jesus known as Yeshua the Nazorean, and I don't think that there is any validity to the theology that Christians believe about Jesus, because those beliefs start with Paul and smack of the Gentile theology of that era.

All you people with religious beliefs had better sit down and consider how the real world works and how your belief system fits in, rather than the other way around, like you've been doing.

Well that's wrong, I think you have us confused with nihilists, but I can assure you I have many beliefs, they just happen to fall into the «real» category.

With that kind of drug and their belief structure, we will have faster - than - light travel, cold fusion, a way to reverse global warming (caused by an overabundance of CO2 in our atmosphere, not god), and a real recipe for amrita, ambrosia, and a panacea by New Year's!

I have dealt with people in real life from atheist telling me my belief is a joke, or the «idea of Christianity» offends them, and then had people try to tell me that God is in fact the evil one.

This degree of literal belief, however, does pose another, real problem because it tends to equate resurrection with resuscitation and perhaps to overidentify the resurrection with what happens to the body.

his mom brought him from church to church for an excorcism while passing up the hospitals and look what happened... these people need REAL medical help, not crazy faith - heads who compound the problem with their unjustified beliefs in invisible monsters.

The traditional religious beliefs of his in - law family may have struck him as a hodgepodge of philosophy and religion with no real consistency.

When Time Shall Be No More is so thoroughly researched and so comprehensive in scope it is difficult to imagine that any critical historian will try to retell the story for decades to come, The only real problem with this truly magnificent book is that Boyer strains to locate the significance of prophecy belief where it does not exist, or exists only inconsequentially: in the realm of secular politics.

His real quarrel was with his fellow Methodists who compromised the older beliefs and practices or, worse, expressed contempt for them.

My only real concern with the «religious» beliefs of politicians is the level of influence they are under from their «group» (read cult).

Along with this rigorous distinction of primary from secondary qualities there has often gone a belief that only the primary qualities could be called really real (their persistence throughout accidental changes being the criterion of their reality), and that secondary qualities are not part of the real world.

Brian, Well I suppose I do have a fear about what these fantasy beliefs can do to cause trouble all over the world, as if we don't have enough with real problems of political ills, poverty, diseases and natural disasters; but mostly I am repelled by so many, like eaglemt and the huge number of others like him / her, who preach hell - fire and eternal torment for those who don't regard their unproven beliefs as reality.

Mohammed STOLE information from the bible and changed them to his needs and beliefs - which has nothing to do with the real text of the bible.

Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.

Des Moines, Iowa (CNN)- With Bible verses painted on the walls of his living room and with an unshakable belief that hell is for real, there's no question that Rob Seyler is a devout evangelical ChristWith Bible verses painted on the walls of his living room and with an unshakable belief that hell is for real, there's no question that Rob Seyler is a devout evangelical Christwith an unshakable belief that hell is for real, there's no question that Rob Seyler is a devout evangelical Christian.

There does seem to be hypocrisy there, but equivocating the political brinksmanship of a few with the real needs, beliefs and philosophies of a huge swash of America is just intentional obtuseness.

The only thing, as far as I am concerned, that keeps us permanent is our belief in the value of goodness, and how we translate that into daily action, even across the boundaries of race, gender, class, and creed... That is real permanence precisely because it does not, as a form of consciousness, submit to dogma that, with the way reality and history simply IS, or plays out, CAN NEVER give us all the answers...

And that is much more useful than David simply providing a new definition for two reasons: he's seeking not necessarily to redefine, but to challenge already existing inconsistencies between our use of the words and how people actually function, AND because such terms are given their meaning collectively so redefining it alone would be meaningless because it wouldn't draw on people's real experience with their beliefs and views of the labels.

You express American religious freedom very well right there at the beginning of your post: «consider yourself what you wish... doesn't make it so...» Yet they are not concerned with what is actually real, but only what they believe in their heads using emotional and cultural feedback to reinforce their beliefs.

Extra special religious like this, Mormonism, Jehova witness, Scientology, and the like are either using their «faith» to get what they personally want and have no real belief or they are both thoroughly brainwashed by the growing up with it and thoroughly stupid for believing in something so ludicrous.

People took issue with Pratt's belief on Twitter, with plenty of Twitter users jumping in to prayersplain how heart attacks work, and doctors, and prayer isn't real and yada, yada.

It's cute to see kids think and behave the way they do, but eventually they have to abandon all belief in fairy tales and deal with real life.

It's better to live with reality than to pretend the religious bullsh!it you believe is real, unless of course you have actual evidence to support your beliefs which otherwise should only be called delusions of the mentally ill.

to J.W. and fred — i think its rather silly to argue anything as fact if its cleary thought based (i.e. lacking proof / evidence) when asked about the where did we come from or how the universe (whatever) i always answer with i don't know, but then i pose an idea — i state openly thats its only an idea... if any one of you religions folks would simple agree to the FACT that what you BELIEVE is real is REALLY only an idea until proven (much like evolution) then i would find much more pleasing conversations beyond the realm of atheists... but alas, i am still waiting — i found some but most are imovible in there beliefs that god is real, provable, and most def.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.