Sentences with phrase «with real evidence»

If you say «no» then you damn well better back it up with some real evidence — but if it's more of the same pure, unadulterated, grade - A, USDA choice, Iowa corn - fed bullshit like you've put in this comment, expect an earful.

Consider the previous comment about «speculative» threats — no scientific point is made (it's just assumed that climate «science» has no authority at all, but no alternative take on the science, with real evidence and real calculations, is presented at all).

That's why I try and back all my claims with real evidence — not only does it show my readers that I have reasons behind my claims, but it also helps with my own personal analysis.

These books range between academic researchers with real evidence, and seat - of - the - pants artists who got...

All the allegations that we have stated above can be backed up with real evidence.

In fact, the professor says that the only benefit that found support with real evidence is a very small advantage in level of intelligence in babies that are breastfed.

Think about how much of a pariah any one of us would become if we spoke out, especially with no real evidence.

ID is merely a philosophical thought with no real evidence behind it.

You make a lot of claims but won't back them up with real evidence.

So, I say, gods might exist but the probability is very low, and decreasing given the amount of time believers have been flailing about trying to make the irrational rational and how science provides better answers with real evidence, peer - reviewed under the scientific method.

It's actually a big deal that NRO is portraying her (with real evidence, after all) as the very model of pro-life feminism.

The Babble is manmade crap — unless someone comes up with some real evidence.

Not exact matches

«There are real shortcomings in how American politics are covered, including pervasive groupthink among media elites, an unhealthy obsession with the insider's view of politics, a lack of analytical rigor, a failure to appreciate uncertainty, a sluggishness to self - correct when new evidence contradicts pre-existing beliefs, and a narrow viewpoint that lacks perspective.»

Topics included: early reporting on inaccuracies in the articles of The New York Times's Judith Miller that built support for the invasion of Iraq; the media campaign to destroy UN chief Kofi Annan and undermine confidence in multilateral solutions; revelations by George Bush's biographer that as far back as 1999 then - presidential candidate Bush already spoke of wanting to invade Iraq; the real reason Bush was grounded during his National Guard days — as recounted by the widow of the pilot who replaced him; an article published throughout the world that highlighted the West's lack of resolve to seriously pursue the genocidal fugitive Bosnian Serb leader Radovan Karadzic, responsible for the largest number of European civilian deaths since World War II; several investigations of allegations by former members concerning the practices of Scientology; corruption in the leadership of the nation's largest police union; a well - connected humanitarian relief organization operating as a cover for unauthorized US covert intervention abroad; detailed evidence that a powerful congressional critic of Bill Clinton and Al Gore for financial irregularities and personal improprieties had his own track record of far more serious transgressions; a look at the practices and values of top Democratic operative and the clients they represent when out of power in Washington; the murky international interests that fueled both George W. Bush's and Hillary Clinton's presidential campaigns; the efficacy of various proposed solutions to the failed war on drugs; the poor - quality televised news program for teens (with lots of advertising) that has quietly seeped into many of America's public schools; an early exploration of deceptive practices by the credit card industry; a study of ecosystem destruction in Irian Jaya, one of the world's last substantial rain forests.

These risks and uncertainties include, among others: the unfavorable outcome of litigation, including so - called «Paragraph IV» litigation and other patent litigation, related to any of our products or products using our proprietary technologies, which may lead to competition from generic drug manufacturers; data from clinical trials may be interpreted by the FDA in different ways than we interpret it; the FDA may not agree with our regulatory approval strategies or components of our filings for our products, including our clinical trial designs, conduct and methodologies and, for ALKS 5461, evidence of efficacy and adequacy of bridging to buprenorphine; clinical development activities may not be completed on time or at all; the results of our clinical development activities may not be positive, or predictive of real - world results or of results in subsequent clinical trials; regulatory submissions may not occur or be submitted in a timely manner; the company and its licensees may not be able to continue to successfully commercialize their products; there may be a reduction in payment rate or reimbursement for the company's products or an increase in the company's financial obligations to governmental payers; the FDA or regulatory authorities outside the U.S. may make adverse decisions regarding the company's products; the company's products may prove difficult to manufacture, be precluded from commercialization by the proprietary rights of third parties, or have unintended side effects, adverse reactions or incidents of misuse; and those risks and uncertainties described under the heading «Risk Factors» in the company's most recent Annual Report on Form 10 - K and in subsequent filings made by the company with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission («SEC»), which are available on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov.

«Papadopoulos» interaction with Russian agents, coupled with real - time evidence of Russian election interference, provided the Court with a broader context in which to evaluate Russia's clandestine activities and Page's history and alleged contact with Russian officials,» the document said.

It's probably not going to be possible to have a jury of people that have never heard of the bands, that have never heard the music, but the real question is, even with that understanding, can they only focus on the evidence that's being presented by the parties at trial and only use that evidence and nothing from their own life experience outside of the courtroom to make that decision?

Morris dug into new evidence around the killing and the film uncovered facts proving that Adams was innocent, and that the real killer was actually a teenaged drifter named David Harris who had spent the evening with Adams.

The reason Keynesianism got such a boost post-crisis was not for any real - world examples of its success — the list of its failures, by contrast, is lengthy — but because of the assertion, accepted far too quickly with far too little evidence, that monetary policy, at the fabled Zero Lower Bound (interest rates of near zero) had lost its effectiveness.

Market evidence suggests a swift, but relatively - shallow re-pricing of UK commercial real estate in response to the vote, with continued resilience in continental Europe.

Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation says there is mounting evidence that house prices in a number of Canadian cities are out of whack with incomes and other economic fundamentals.The latest report from CMHC says there is evidence of overvaluation in nine of the 15 real estate markets included in the research.

If Congress started to evidence real progress on tax reform, economic expectations would likely rebound along with investor's preference for value.

But does real - world evidence support your contention when applied to advanced countries with large unused productive capacities and that issue their own currencies, such as Japan or Canada?

Aside from the unacceptable optics, evidence shows that boards composed of people with diverse skills, cultural backgrounds, gender and experience — just like the real world — are more effective than less diverse boards, Leblanc says.

After all, the proverbial «boxes» have been ticked; permitting, sufficient infrastructure, customer base, real producing assets (as opposed to highly speculative land with evidence of graphite), revenue, and operating cash flow.

Accordingly, a year - over-year increase in new claims of about 20 % (which would currently equate to a level of about 340,000 weekly new claims) would create a significant concern of a new recession in progress, particularly if coupled with other evidence such as equity market weakness and slowing growth in real personal income.

But that's okay, because while I may concur with your equation» Something does not exist = not real» I also realize you have absolutely NO evidence that what I call something does not exist.

In the real world, we must deal with levels of certainty based on observed evidence.

No intelligent person would think that the only real things are those which are proven with evidence.

no apparent evidence of ill - will, and 3)... an experience of unity.Now, David, I haven't known you for very long (blogwise), but I respect what I have read from yr deep and thoughtful spirit, so with that in mind, I just don't see how this personal experience is translatable or cd be used as some kind of template when faced with the real Wal - Mart world.Do we not, like Jesus, show out true colours under pressure.Maybe I'm missing something... please correct me If I am and remember, I'm not into boob jobs (cleavage enhancement)

You can't counter with any evidence the obvious biblical evidence recorded by REAL people describing ACTUAL events of the time.

Will he choose to deal with the situation based solely upon doing what is best for the nation, based upon real world evidence - even if that evidence conflicts with his faith?

:... still we have a ton of physical evidence that God is real...» One point of view: Most, if not all, Atheists would disagree with this statement and ask for solid scientific evidence to support such a claim.

Something for which there is no evidence that it is real, or that it interacts with our world at all if it is real.

If God interacts with the natural world (I think that's what you mean when you say he is real with respect to the natural world) then when he does so there should, in principle, be evidence that he does so — measurable and testable.

You spend copious amounts of time rationalizing why there is no evidence for anything you believe and why the real world isn't consistent with what you believe.

Maybe, maybe not, but they CERTAINLY wouldn't insist with the same stubbornness as they do now, without any real evidence of God's existence.

To say there is no evidence for the real existence of the most discussed figure in history denies the unique manner in which Christianity came about (a claim that God came in the flesh conveyed with real life details, etc).

And secondly, Stephen Barr's point seems to be a real solution: that theologians need to learn the language of science - not just absorbing the factual evidence of recent discoveries, but also the methodologies and modes of thought that scientists, whether quantum physicists or population geneticists, employ in their day - to - day grappling with problems in their fields.

The first real observational evidence of the Earth's motion came in 1729 with the discovery of the «aberration of starlight.»

What has been expressed here is that * some * evidence does exist — enough to create a theory or hypothesis that reasonates with people's actual experiences, that fits the evidence and experiences they do have to go on and provides real, demonstrable benefits in the process.

Theocracy is based on studies of an old book or two written by philosophers and politicians in addition to stories handed down over generations with no real physical evidence to analyze.

no real substance, no real evidence, just because taliban says so?how can people be so deceived?are you going to believe someone who describes them self with the word schizophrenics?

i'm not a proponent of proving one's case ONLY with personal experience and not a shred of real evidence.

@Bootyfunk - «i'm not a proponent of proving one's case ONLY with personal experience and not a shred of real evidence.»

The real evidence of one's faith is not in what they say with their mouth but rather in the life that is lived.

It is this misunderstand and lack of knowledge that leads people to contemplate and assert the existence of god with no real proof or evidence other than a sacred collection of texts written over the last few thousand years.

The answer i'm looking for is evidences that the Atheists community can provide us with real solutions to prove that if we all close down churches and the Vatican and if we remove every religious symbols, it will bring us peace and a better quality of life.

Examples are 9/11 hijackings, The holding back of stem cell research that could save countless human lives, Aids being spread due to religious opposition to the use of condoms, Christians legally fighting this year to teach over 1 million young girls in America that they must always be obedient to men, the eroding of child protection laws in America by Christians, for so called faith based healing alternatives that place children's health and safety at risk, burning of witches, the crusades, The Nazi belief that the Aryans were god's chosen to rule the world, etc... But who cares about evidence in the real world when we have our imaginations and delusions about gods with no evidence of them existing.

With regard to hell, or heaven for that matter, I wonder why Christians have no problem claiming the existence of such places even though they can offer no evidence that these places are real?