Not exact matches
RE: «when you're standing before your
judgment being judged
for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «
reason»
with you» So, you're so SURE gawwwwwwd didn't give us science that you forego all medical treatment, and you live like the Amish....
So when you're standing before your
judgment being judged
for the things you deny, how about taking all of those science books and «
reason»
with you.
President Carter's announcement at Notre Dame in 1977 that Americans had gotten over their «inordinate fear of communism»» together
with Secretary of State Cyrus Vance's statement that Carter and Soviet leader Leonid Brezhnev shared «similar dreams and aspirations about the most fundamental issues»» demonstrated that the degradation of moral
judgment into moral posturing could coexist
with breathtaking strategic myopia (and indeed moral blindness) in minds
for which the evocation of the specter of Vietnam marked an end to moral
reasoning, or indeed any other form of
reasoning.
One important
reason has to do
with the prominence in such settings of the
judgment that the term «interreligious dialogue» labels the only proper mode
for intercourse among religious communities.
The highest task
for health education in a society devoted to excellence is to discover and introduce into the cultural stream modes of living that will fully employ bodily energies in ways that are at the same time consonant
with the ideals of
reason, qualitative
judgment, and ethical concern.
Part of this culture of criticism surrounding singleness comes in the implicit
judgment that if a person is single later in life (and by that, I mean after 25), there must be something wrong
with him or her — single
for a
reason, as opposed to single
for a season.
But to wimp out
with the «Will jolly, I don't really know
for sure because there are all these different views held by different people
for different
reasons and based on very different levels of
judgment and intelligence, so I don't really know what I personally think about anything.»
However this must be done in such a way that the
reasons for both opinions, that is, those favorable and those unfavorable to evolution, be weighed and judged
with the necessary seriousness, moderation and measure, and provided that all are prepared to submit to the
judgment of the Church, to whom Christ has given the mission of interpreting authentically the Sacred Scriptures and of defending the dogmas of faithful»
In separate (brief)
reasons for judgment, Justice Gageler agreed
with the conclusion in the majority
reasons that Barbaro does not apply to civil penalty proceedings and joined in the proposed orders.
The decision in the ACCC's case against PZ Cussons alleging participation in a laundry detergent cartel was handed down late last year,
with Justice Wigney dismissing the ACCC's claim; the
reasons for judgment have now been published.
Personally, since their body of work over their relatively short amount of time has shown me some
reason for optimism, I am willing to go along
with their professional
judgment.
They ought to be warned that their modus operandi will not lead to
reasoned dialogue and reconciliation
with me but may push me to invoke my right pursuant to Article 2 and 130 of the Constitution so that the Supreme Court may settle once and
for all whether or not under Article 55 of the Constitution a political party can gag a citizen from defending, and upholding the Constitution demonstrated
with a Supreme Court
judgment simply because he is perceived to be a member of that political party.
«There's no question that this grand jury had an immensely difficult task before them, but I have full faith that their
judgment was fair and
reasoned and I applaud DA Donovan
for overseeing this case
with the utmost integrity.
Even though the disgust response arose
for reasons that have little to do
with morality, it seems to be pretty effective at shaping moral
judgments.»
(2) signed by an individual, or his parent, to the effect that he has been denied admission to or not permitted to continue in attendance at a public college by
reason of race, color, religion, or national origin, and the Attorney General believes the complaint is meritorious and certifies that the signer or signers of such complaint are unable, in his
judgment, to initiate and maintain appropriate legal proceedings
for relief and that the institution of an action will materially further the orderly achievement of desegregation in public education, the Attorney General is authorized, after giving notice of such complaint to the appropriate school board or college authority and after certifying that he is satisfied that such board or authority has had a reasonable time to adjust the conditions alleged in such complaint, to institute
for or in the name of the United States a civil action in any appropriate district court of the United States against such parties and
for such relief as may be appropriate, and such court shall have and shall exercise jurisdiction of proceedings instituted pursuant to this section, provided that nothing herein shall empower any official or court of the United States to issue any order seeking to achieve a racial balance in any school by requiring the transportation of pupils or students from one school to another or one school district to another in order to achieve such racial balance, or otherwise enlarge the existing power of the court to insure compliance
with constitutional standards.
One
reason for these kinds of problematic
judgments by software and device makers is that digital comics are almost entirely being made from print comics or comics that are made
with print as the primary format and digital as a secondary or adjunct release.
The
reason for the change lies
with a settlement the major credit bureaus made in 2015
with 31 state attorneys general, where the bureaus agreed to adopt more stringent policies
with regard to credit reporting and the amount of information needed to link tax liens and civil
judgments to individuals.
When you are collection proof, there is really no
reason for you to file
for bankruptcy protection because you have no assets to protect that a creditor
with a
judgment can get from you.
An adjustment to the continuing education requirement may be made by the Department, provided that the licensee documents good cause that prevents compliance, and the Department determines that there is good cause that prevents compliance, which shall include, but not be limited to, any of the following
reasons: poor health or a specific physical or mental disability certified by an appropriate health care professional; extended active duty
with the Armed Forces of the United States; or other good cause beyond the licensee's control which, in the
judgment of the Department, makes it impossible
for the licensee to comply
with the continuing education requirements in a timely manner.
Of course, if someone had access to & used * any * standard
for assessing evidence that was * reliably * correlated
with «truth - seeking» & that could be used to determine the LR or weight to be assigned evidence in a Bayesian framework, that wouldn't be «motivated
reasoning» as I've defined it; motivated
reasoning refers to the tendency of individuals to assess evidence in a manner that promotes some goal or interest independent of forming an accurate
judgment — such as maintaining his or her standing in an identify - defining group.
In the course of
judgment, the House of Lords unanimously upheld the pleaded head of loss
for «stigma damages», under which the claimants claimed that their future employability had been handicapped by
reason of the stigma attaching to the bank's activities and their innocent association
with them.
Opp was fired Dec. 22 and Mackoff made it «very clear» the
reason for termination had nothing to do
with her pregnancy and everything to do
with willingness to «concot a falsehood and how that negatively impacted my ability to trust her
judgment and her honesty.»
In Chester, if one takes the majority and dissent speeches (
reasons for judgment) at face value — the split was 3 - 2 — the plaintiff succeeded on the normative basis that the duty of care in issue was so important that that justified dispensing completely
with any requirement
for a causal connection between the defendant's negligence and the plaintiff's injury.
[4] In the
reasons for judgment of the Court of Appeal, Justice Hourigan agreed
with the motions judge that the «occurrence» causing property damage in this case was the scratching of the windows caused by the contractor's employees and not the presence of airborne cement debris.
FIPO also argued that the majority had wrongly rejected Mr Glynn's dissenting
judgment and / or failed to give adequate
reasons for disagreeing
with the dissenting
judgment.
Reasons for judgment were released today dealing
with a fee dispute between a personal injury plaintiff and his lawfirm.
In her
reasons for judgment, Justice Smith found that, although «persons
with disabilities face prejudice and stereotyping and that there is a risk of unconscious bias about the quality of life of a person
with a disability,» she was «not persuaded that the risks to persons
with disabilities are such that they can not be avoided through practices of careful and well - informed capacity assessments by qualified physicians who are alert to those risks.»
It is true that the first immigration judge in his
judgment mentioned joint purchase of Maya the cat as one of the many indications that the illegal immigrant had an established relationship
with his partner — but it was not the
reason for that judge's decision and in the
judgment on appeal the cat was not even mentioned.
According to Shelter, which acted
for the tenant, «This
judgment is likely to help disabled tenants in private or social housing, who are threatened
with eviction where they have limited security, have no other defences, and the
reason they are being evicted is linked to their disability.»
The Court largely upheld this
reasoning in its
judgment on appeal, recalling that the Leipzig - Halle airport was in competition
with other regional airports to become DHL's European hub
for air freight (paragraph 40 of the
judgment).
Specific topics covered include the role of the prosecutor, defendant and justice of the peace; the presumption of innocence; proof beyond a reasonable doubt and findings of credibility; elements of an offence; guilty pleas to an offence charged or another offence; mens rea, strict liability and absolute liability offences; defences to regulatory charges, including due diligence, reasonable mistake of fact and officially induced error; trial procedure; presentation of evidence; rules of evidence; the voir dire; dealing
with the unrepresented defendant; Charter applications; access to justice issues; paralegals and lawyers in the courtroom; requests
for a bilingual trial; articulating
reasons for judgment; delivery of a
judgment; sentencing; and trials of young persons.
While this blog is primarily concerned about ICBC injury claims against at - fault drivers (tort claims) written
reasons for judgment were released today that are of interest to anyone caught up in a dispute
with ICBC
with respect to their own insurance coverage and the value of damage to their car.
However, you are unhappy
with the
judgment for any number of
reasons.
It is surely legitimate
for a judge to agree
with one party and disagree
with the other, and to state the
reasons for judgment in the words of the successful party.
Not content
with being so badly beaten, The Bay appealed and in a three - line
judgment devoid of any
reasoning the Divisional Court concluded that the case «cried out
for punitive damages» and replaced the $ 100 award
with a whopping $ 300 recovery.
The
reasons for judgment in this case put squarely at issue the important public values
with which this Court (and, likely, the Supreme Court of Canada) will ultimately have to grapple in determining whether, and in what circumstances, assisted suicide may, or may not, be in accord
with the public interest, including the interest of that minority of the public in circumstances similar to those of Ms. Taylor.
where the
judgment or order has been pronounced in court or chambers
with no provision
for written
reasons to follow, the date of the oral pronouncement.
In this article, I have looked at the assignment of
reasons for judgment on the Court over the last three chief justiceships,
with specific reference to the relative rate of assignments to male and female judges.
If one were to adopt the analogous
reasoning in the latter
judgment, it could be contended that the Rampton patients were placed in a distinct legal situation which, despite being imposed involuntarily and
for a temporary period, was inextricably bound up
with their personal circumstances and existence so as to amount to a «personal characteristic».
* Current commercial pilot's license * 3,000 hours of total flight time * Great team player
with ability to coordinate actions
for flight safety * Outstanding written and verbal communication skills * Excellent observational and problem - solving skills * Ability to use sound
reasoning and good
judgment to respond quickly to situations
My ability to exercise good
judgment along
with excellent analytical skills and critical thinking has been the
reason for expedited promotion over the years.
FAMILY LAW — CHILDREN — Best interests — Where both parents seek sole parental responsibility and
for the child to live
with them — Where the respondent mother believes the child would settle down and accept the arrangement if the court ordered
for the child to spend no time
with applicant father — Where the court has a statutory mandate to make parenting orders
with the child's best interests as the paramount concern — Where there is little doubt that the child would benefit from having a meaningful relationship
with both parents — Where the child's clear views that he does not want to spend time
with the respondent mother should be given significant weight in the circumstances — Where the child is of an age, maturity and intelligence to have principally formed his own rationally based views — Where the court is satisfied that it is in the child's best interests
for the presumption of equal shared parental responsibility to be rebutted — Where the respondent father is to have sole parental responsibility and the child is to live
with him — Where the applicant mother is permitted to attend certain school and sporting events of the child — Where the child should be able to instigate contact
with the respondent mother as he considers appropriate to his needs and circumstances — Where the orders made are least likely to lead to the institution of further proceedings in relation to the child — Where the child is to have the outcome of these proceedings, the effect of the orders and the
reasons for judgment explained to him by an expert as soon as reasonably practical.