As a result, On Stranger Tides is more in tune with the Chronicles of Narnia movies than the other Pirates... films,
with religious ethic mixing very well with box office spectacle, which should please both secular and Christian audiences.
Not exact matches
Not to confuse the psychological issues
with the separation of church and state, we obviously need to keep
religious interference and favoritism to a minimum in government, while shifting the societal paradigm to discourage fervent religiosity while fostering evolved secular morals and
ethics.
This vertical connection provided the individual
with autonomy, allowing him to evaluate events and relationships from the point of view of
religious ethics.
I have a theory that SBNRs are so because one or more or a combination of the following: (1) they can't justify their spiritual texts - and so they try to remove themselves from gory genocidal tales, misogyny and anecdotal professions of a man / god, (2) can't defend and are turned off by organized
religious history (which encompasses the overwhelming majority of spiritual experiences)- which is simply rife
with cruelty, criminal behavior and even modern day cruel - ignorant ostracization, (3) are unable to separate
ethics from their respective
religious moral code - they, like many theists on this board, wouldn't know how to think ethically because they think the genesis of morality resides in their respective spiritual guides / traditions and (4) are unable to separate from the communal (social) benefits of their respective religion (many atheists aren't either).
Max Weber noted that as the pursuit of wealth becomes devoid of
religious and ethical meaning, «it tends to become associated
with purely mundane passions, which often actually give it the character of sport» (The Protestant
Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism).
A more explicit theologian,
with UU identification and salience, is James Luther Adams, who has focused on social
ethics and the
religious role of voluntary associations.
The church, into which one is born (like the medieval Catholic Church), is distinguished by an
ethic of conservation and compromise in its relationship
with the surrounding society; the sect, which one must join as an adult (like the Anabaptists), rejects the surrounding society and has an
ethic of rigor, perfection and transformation; the mystic is primarily a subjectively
religious person who is not linked to any particular
religious body (or, if linked to one, does not find it very important).
Morality and
ethics, like religion and theology, are observable in this literature, but they can be recovered only
with a method capable of identifying moral values in what began as folk or community literature before it was made normative as
religious canon.
The problem
with trying to reconcile these two conceptions of Catholic
ethics regarding war — the «peace tradition» of the
religious life and the just war tradition of secular life — is precisely that they are so fundamentally different.
Ben Meyer comments that most Jesus scholars of the day couple the liberal emphasis on the
ethics with an equally liberal «hermeneutic of empathy» In turn, a host of imaginative these were put forward in an effort to understand more fully Jesus
religious experience by tracing out the psychological development of Jesus's messianic awareness.
«The
ethic of Jesus may offer valuable insights to and sources of criticism for a prudential social
ethic which deals
with present realities; but no such social
ethic can be directly derived from a pure
religious ethic.
I don't bother
with many other comment sections on the internet, so if she wants to explain to me how a complete lack of proof led her in one of the worst possible directions or how her lack of understanding of morals and
ethics lead her to choose the most criminal of
religious cults to join..., then that would be great and I'm sure we could all enjoy picking apart her arguments for her «conversion» to those of us who know the difference between reason, logic, common sense, and
ethics and morals and empathy and sympathy... as I would guess she doesn't give a crap anyway I doubt she'll show up here.
Education, «civilization,» even leisure, seem to Whitehead to be necessary» before either individuals or society can operate upon sufficiently general (i.e., non-selfish) criteria to make world consciousness a possibility.24 However, as we have already seen, world consciousness in Whitehead is the basis of social
ethics and in close affinity
with what he would want to designate as the fundamental
religious impulse, the maximization of value.
His is a fellowship
with a past, a present, and a future tied together by rites, theology, and a
religious ethic.
In consequence, even in the later codes, what we would call
religious etiquette and humane
ethic were often put upon a level,
with the constant danger that the first would become a substitute for the second in the service of God.
Many visions of perfection are more or less the same or at least analogical, and therefore if each faith keeps its
ethics of law dynamic within the framework of, and in tension
with, its own transcendent vision of perfection, the different
religious and secular faiths can have fruitful dialogue.
My thesis is that the many visions of perfection are more or less the same or at least analogical, and therefore if each Faith keeps its
ethics of law dynamic within the framework of and in tension
with its own transcendent vision of perfection, the different
religious and secular Faiths can have a fruitful dialogue at depth on the nature of human alienation which makes love impossible and for updating our various approaches to personal and public law
with greater realism
with insights from each other.
If each Faith keeps its
ethics of law dynamic within the framework of and in tension
with its own transcendent vision of perfection, the different
religious and secular Faiths can have a fruitful dialogue on the nature of human alienation which makes love impossible and for updating our various approaches to personal and public law
with greater realism
with insights from each other.
This is the possibility that a distinct set of
religious symbols and practices may arise that address issues of political legitimacy and political
ethics but that are not fused
with either church or state.
For example, a curriculum that seems to privilege courses having to do
with religious experience, worship, spirituality, counseling, and the like over, say, systematic and philosophical theology may reveal a commitment to the assumption that God is understood effectively rather than discursively; while a curriculum relatively more rich in offerings in
ethics, sociology of religion, liberation theology, and the like than in offerings in historical theology, patristics, liturgics, and mystical traditions may reveal a commitment to the view that God is better understood in action than in contemplation.
No man has insisted on this more vigorously than Baron von Hügel, who
with all his deep faith in the fullness of our Lord's embodiment of God, was yet ever ready to maintain that in other
religious traditions, and likewise in science, art, philosophy,
ethics, as well as in the simple humdrum experiences of daily life, God in some way and to some degree has been found and known.
What had begun as a
religious idea of reality and
ethics had in its evolution compromised
with both the world and other philosophies.
A couple of years ago I had this crazy idea to get my year 9
ethics students to create a soap opera where various moral issues were dealt
with according to
religious and secular ethical principles.
A revision aid outlining the different topics in the AQA medical
ethics unit complete
with religious quotes.
Saskia Calderón by Nabil Ahmed and Manuela Moscoso; Daniel Garza Usabiaga on David Alfaro Siqueiros; Tobi Maier in conversation
with Libidiunga Cardoso; Myriam Ben Salah in conversation
with Martha Kirszenbaum; Sarah Schönfeld and Ashkan Sepahvand; Juliana Ossa on feminine
religious mysticism in New Spain; François Bucher by Natalia Valencia; Eduardo Basualdo and Adriana Minoliti in conversation
with Dorothée Dupuis; Noah Simblist on
ethics in the art market; Fanny Drugeon on the Menil Collection; four poems by Frank Báez; Irmgard Emmelhainz on civil uprisings in Santa Fe in Mexico City; Trajal Harrell in conversation
with Xavier Acarin.
Experiments
with Truth explores, for the first time, the resonance of Mahatma Gandhi's
ethics of nonviolence in the visual arts through both works of the late twentieth and twenty - first centuries and masterpieces of classical
religious art of the past.
Presented at two national
religious ethics conferences regarding environmental justice work
with the Lummi Nation against coal export; spoke at two denominational conferences
The Best Lawyers in America The Lawdragon 500 Leading Plaintiffs» Lawyers in America Florida Super Lawyers Florida's Top Lawyers Florida's Legal Elite Chair of the Florida Bar Professional
Ethics Committee Board Certification as a Specialist in Civil Trial Law by The Florida Bar Board Certification in Civil Trial Advocacy by the National Board of Trial Advocacy «AV» rated by Martindale Hubbell, the highest rating in both
ethics and legal ability Members of the American Board of Trial Advocates Board positions
with a wide variety of legal, civic, charitable, and
religious organizations
But I can not say that a professor who disagrees
with me, who in her instruction grounds a lawyer's ethical duties in moral obligation, or who views the lawyer's decisions as properly informed by the values and norms of her community, including her
religious community, fails to instruct her students in legal
ethics.
Parents
with elementary - and secondary - aged students should be provided
with a choice between
religious or
ethics instruction.
The claimants sought an exemption for their children from a mandatory «
ethics and
religious culture» course on the basis that it interfered
with their parental right to transmit the tenets of the Catholic faith to their children.