Sentences with phrase «with religious views»

The turning point in our therapy was a session that dealt with her religious views.

So, Resume Writing Service begin with the religious views.

To Bencher John Campion, TWU's covenant «has little to do with religious views.

The Act recognizes that officials of religious groups are free to refuse to perform marriages that are not in accordance with the religious views of their respective faiths.

However, I struggled to identify with religious views so different from my own, and I hesitated to speak openly with such different opinions on family, prayer, and God.

When it comes to dating and finding a mate, it becomes that much more important that we find someone who matches up with our religious views and can embody these same traits that we hold dear.

Labour MP Jess Phillips said the choices women made over their own bodies «should have nothing to do with the religious views of our politicians».

A decision coinciding with religious views is not invalid for that reason as long as it has a secular purpose and effect.

As a curative, he searches for common narratives and themes that those with religious views can employ when debating RGTs.

But it is completely wrong that anyone (or business) should be exempt from following the same rules as the rest simply because the rules don't jibe with their religious views.

You know like saying somebody should not be allowed to be President because you don't agree with their religious views... You know kinda like the majority of the comments I am reading here... I mean honestly, if you can't respect others views, then how can you expect them to respect yours?

Fifty per cent said businesses with religious views should provide services to homosexuals.

Why could they not focus on the graduation of students without feeling the need to be intrusive and over-bearing with their religious views to the point that a legal case could be made against them?

That is your problem... having temper tantrums because you can not stop anyone who disagrees with your religious views from expessing their alternative views.

It is so much easier to find some hack to agree with your religious views than to bother with facts or reality.

The coworkers that he was harassing with his religious views are the ones who should be filing a suit against him.

The 1st Amendment does NOT protect you here... you have no «right» to harrass coworkers... on the job... with your religious view (s),

Not exact matches

Amazon lists a number of items it restricts from its website, and there is a category for «offensive products,» which the company describes partially as «products that promote or glorify hatred, violence, racial, sexual or religious intolerance or promote organizations with such views.»

«Whether the result of religious upbringing or poor sex ed in our school systems, there are a lot of people with a negative view of sex.

A person's military affiliation has nothing to do with their political, religious, or societal views.

If your views of America are one of Isolationism, Hatred of Others, Intolerance of Religious Freedoms, then You are a not inline with the True American Ideals and you should move to Another country.

In an interview with Mashable, Jim Jansen, a senior fellow at the Pew Internet Project, said: «There is a view that the more tech - savvy a person is, the less religious they tend to be.

Not among those who use «religious faith» as a political weapon and sanctimoniously refer to themselves as the moral ones and the rest of us who do not agree with their ignorant and distorted view of things as immoral.

My problem with them is that they push their beliefs on others and try to legislate their religious based views.

We certainly have enough Christian billboards... what's wrong with another group expressing their religious views?

It adds: «With respect to the existence and the political choices of the State of Israel, they must be seen from a point of view that is not in itself religious but based on general considerations of international law.»

I also know that some religious views do not conflict with any part of the consti.tution.

The religious among us keep trying to chip away at the separation of church and state by making people recite the pledge of allegiance with the God clause, installing religious symbols and displays on public property, holding prayer breakfasts for politicians, berating the removal of prayer in public schools, trying to pass laws limiting women's access to birth control, and trying to get an amendment passed outlawing abortion (since in their view God creates a soul the moment a sperm enters an egg).

Conservatives will never win again with such religious views.

you sir are practicing a religion one that means so much to you that you use it as your online name also please show me where I call you a fool or is telling someone not to make a fool of themself the same as calling them a fool which would mean you are very religious as far as Colin he said nothing that related to the debate I was in with you... we are talking about Atheism as a religious view not debating the existence of God now look over the definitions I have shown you and please explain how Atheism does not fit into the said definitions And you claim that evolution is true so the burden of proof falls in your lap as it is the base of your religion.

But if Mr. Kurtz and those who think like him had their way, the restrictions would be intolerable» at least for religious groups advancing views that meet with their disapproval.

Ever notice that the people who want to share their religious views with you almost never want you to share your religious views with them?

Hmmm... One might conclude, given the religious nature of this gentleman, that quite often... «religious» can and does (but not always) goes hand - in - hand with «conservative» political views... or the GOP (republicans).

However, 1) he clearly was not able to contain himself and 2) my question here is whether or not it's ok to fire someone when their religious views conflict with their ability to do the job their company pays them to do.

My religious views aside... Think of how many people this church could have helped with $ 700,000.

It will end when those minority have us praying in our own homes with the curtains closed, no religious items in public view, even on our own property.

If you look at the entire religious structure (who they believe God to be, their daily relationship with God, who they think God was before, their view of heaven, their view of Jesus, etc.), traditional Christianity and Islam have a lot more in common than traditional Christianity and Mormonism.

Certainly it would be filled with people who hold various views, but isn't secularism itself just another form of religious expression?

I do find it really interesting that from the view point of some religious followers even a single point they can pick as inconsistent with their stories invalidates the entire scientific method.

Anyway, it sounds like we agree — if an organization believes (rightly or wrongly) that a person's religious views, or lack thereof, conflict with their objectives, they should be able to fire them.

The problem with your list is that if we take examples such as your first one, «European Colonization of Americas», it can viewed as a religious cause but with the growing trade battles at that time between European states we can say that it was a trade war that the native Americans got caught in the middle of.

its not really atheism or religion that I have a problem with, its the hate, control, and fear that goes along with it that I have a problem with, you say that those who are spiritual are into new agey, crystal ball, stuff, see that's what I'm talking about, you assume to know what something is about when you don't understand something you naturally fear it, your self righteous clouds you, don't you get that by being narrow minded in your view towards things, you really act no better than religious fundamentalists, being spiritual is a lot more than just the new agey, think positive all the time that you think it is, its about being aware of who you are?

In sum, then, the penalty for neglecting to allow for a divine temporal freedom beyond that of God's primordial nature is to be required to grant, in effect, that the timeless and the abstract adequately describe the temporal and the concrete, even the concrete acts of divine love for individuals.2 Such a view does not agree with the deliverance of religious experience.

The freer a society, with better education, and the easier access to information and different views is, the less religious it will become.

If Israel views itself as caretaker of the land — its divine mission, in Buber's view — whose owner always makes space for those who need it (for those who choose to live with the same inclusive spirit), the religious precept of imitatio dei would require us as Jews to share that space, even the holy city of Jerusalem, to make it a «divine place» — the place «God intended to have made of it.»

Our task was to reformulate our liberal heritage in light of liberation thinking but also with a view to rethinking the relation of Christianity to the natural world and to other religious traditions.

One could argue that this had religious advantages from a Christian point of view, since it emphasized what God is doing here and now in and with us rather than locating God's action in the distant past.

This vertical connection provided the individual with autonomy, allowing him to evaluate events and relationships from the point of view of religious ethics.

«Whatever issue may come before me as President, if I should be elected, on birth control, divorce, censorship, gambling or any other subject, I will make my decision in accordance with these views - in accordance with what my conscience tells me to be in the national interest, and without regard to outside religious pressure or dictates.»

«It is sadly becoming axiomatic among many that religious faith is incompatible with a scientific world view.