Sentences with phrase «with simple statements»

Each skill seems to build on the next one and I like how it is laid out with simple statements.

While some pointed to the technical benefits of various platforms, others were at a loss for words, responding with simple statements such as «WTF» or crediting the increases to «pumping and FOMO».

I'll try to start our conversation over with simple statements that we can agree about.

Another habit is to list a range of challenges in a policy area, for example, immigration, and then conclude with a simple statement: «We need The Wall!»

You seek to ignore one of the key issues in the entire debate as «not meriting a response» with a simple statement of denial.

with the simple statement that «We ought to teach those values Americans share» -

When Gary L. Perry, a Paladino - allied activist, started bending his ear in the parking lot before he could even close the car door, he responded to harried urgings with a simple statement and a thank you.

With his simple statement, «I am indeed, a candidate for Congress,» Harlem Assemblyman Keith L. T. Wright kicked off his long anticipated bid to succeed the retiring Lion of Harlem, Rep. Charles B. Rangel.

It was because Cameron neutralised the NHS as an issue at the election with his simple statement that he would ringfence the NHS budget.

Wear this dress with a simple statement necklace and wedges for a beautiful ensemble.

Wear this dress with a simple statement necklace and wedges for a stunning ensemble.

One critic concurred with the simple statement: «Jean Harlow is awful.»

As strange as it sounds, if Marvel really wants to have a dramatic launchpad moment at the end of the film, perhaps the best they could do is close Infinity War with a simple statement «The Avengers Will Return...».

We scored the game a 6.0 out of 10, concluding the review with a simple statement: «Like the hungry zombies that inhabit the titular island, Dead Island simply needs more brains.»

Nancy closes with the simple statement, «I think we have a really good idea of what we hope to achieve for the rest of this year and how we can go about meeting our goals.»

The company announced its withdrawl from Frankfurt with a simple statement saying it didn't see the show as being a sensible way to spend its limited resources.

He did finish up with a simple statement, «there are other areas of Ram Ram's business with a bigger opportunity,» and opened the door for much greater things.

It is often easy to start writing with this simple statement.

All of these reasons turn students to EssayThinker.com with a simple statement — «Write my essay for me!»

With that simple statement he managed to turn the phenomenological subject / object upside - down.

Thank - you letters should begin with a simple statement thanking the vendor for their service.

Answer: Answer this question with a simple statement that describes your career goals and gives a glimpse of your positive insight towards career.

Secondly, with the simple statement that your references are available upon request, you put yourself in the advantageous position of knowing for sure they're interested in you when they make the request.

A couple of years ago, a federal rule was created to provide all home buyers with a simple statement that made it very clear exactly how much would be owed every month, and what every fee involved with getting the mortgage meant to the bottom line.

My MIL helped me relax with that simple statement and I've carried it through to all other phases of Life With Kids so far: «Don't let the parenting blogs / teachers / media / books / etc.

Not exact matches

MVMT is one such company that seeks to keep watches simple and affordable while still making a statement with their look.

The key findings can be summarized in one simple statement — a person's experience with your landing page forms is directly influenced by the colors you use.

Simple as it sounds, the statements all pertain to Amazon — with strong, almost unassailable specificity.

«It's a simple statement for sure, but I strive to spend as much time as possible with my wife and one - year - old son.

Despite our desire for simplicity, good expert advice is usually heavy with qualifying statements, candid about evidence to the contrary, and not as simple as we'd like it to be.

Yeah, I can agree with that statement, as far as it goes; ethics are not at all simple, and much of the reasoning behind our decision making is subtle and sub-conscious.

This poster continues to make these types of statements which are either false of simple declarative absolutes with no substantiation and then refuses to engage anyone when questioned.

All of your statements are incorrect and can be easily shown false with simple google searches to respected sites.

The simple statement above affirms the person who asked the question and invites them to continue discussing these matters with you.

When our conclusions regarding regarding troubling passages in the NT contradict the clear, positive statements out of the mouth of Jesus in John 3:16, 18, 5:24, and elsewhere, regarding eternal life being a simple matter of faith we need to keep seeking until our understanding of those passages agrees with that He said.

and knowing that «going deep» so to speak on theology isn't her typical move, I figured I would take a read and see if perhaps she had changed somehow in the years since we worshiped at the same church every week, or if this was merely a simple «It's all good with Jesus, so judge not, and so on» type post / statement.

Christians will trump Jesus» words with just about any other character they can — however opposite it is from his simple statements — to validate a point.

William's simple statement made me realize I haven't talked much about other religions with our children, and the particularities of our Christian practice flare up when I think about William comparing himself to Noah and Sarah.

Peterson would probably admit that this statement is an overly dialectical way of expressing the simpler truth that «a real speaking of God exists meaningfully only with Christ.»

There are, however, greater difficulties with what appear to be the simplest statements about the physical world, the ones most often taken as paradigmatic by those who deny correspondence.

A statement obtained by the AP, by the Kalavryta diocese's clerics on Saturday read: «It is an outrageous inspiration for someone to change his gender in a few minutes, with a simple declaration, so contrary to what God has gifted people with... whoever has «gender dysphoria» is mentally ill.

Whether it was deliberate or unintentional, I would hope in the future the author of this article would use better judgment or take more time to research the Catholic teaching on the Eucharist (to at least put Sebastian's statement in context) before quoting a statement that is clearly an error to any Catholic that has a sense of reverence («frozen holy wine transformed into the blood of Christ» on popsicle sticks) but could mislead those with simple faith or those who are unfamiliar to the true Catholic teaching.

One statement of harmonic relations begins with the octave (1/2) as simple, goes on to 1/3, (the fifth), 1/4, (the double octave), 1/5 (the third above the double octave), etc..

Each describes a seemingly simple answer to the question of the meaning of life and then negates this answer with statements that typify confusion, mystery, openness, searching: «he does not know real answers,» «you don't know where you're going,» «we find ourselves never getting anywhere,» «what are the real answers,» «knowledge does not contain answers,» «there are no answers in power,» and so forth.

The simple fact is that he comes out with deliberately disingenuous statements and downright falsehoods.

The problem with Arsenal fans in a SIMPLE statement.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger reportedly left many of his players in tears with a short and simple statement this morning shortly before he announced he'd be stepping down at the end of the season.

Some experts, even those who participated in the drafting of the Prague statement, did not agree with its approach, concerned that describing any concussion, even one with symptoms that cleared within 10 days, as «simple» as unwise.

How is it that you feel qualified to make such sweeping blanket statements and wrap it all up with your simple homily of «Where there's a will, there's a way?»