An unfortunate aspect of economic analyses of the impacts of carbon pricing is that they usually only consider the costs of such legislation, while ignoring the benefits associated
with slowing global warming.
Not exact matches
In time we will learn whether the agreements at Kyoto presage a similar success
with respect to
slowing global warming.
A weaker sun might
slow human - induced climate change slightly but when the sun eventually recovers force,
global warming would heat up
with even more of a vengeance.
With these scenarios in mind, the researchers identified what measures can be taken to
slow the rate of
global warming to avoid the worst consequences, particularly the low - probability high - impact events.
President - elect Trump on Tuesday rounded out a potential dream team of anti-environment cabinet members
with the chief executive officer of ExxonMobil, among the world's 10 largest companies and one that has profited from
global warming and worked to
slow the fight against climate change.
Faced
with a possible U.S. retreat on climate efforts, European officials fear a leadership vacuum will embolden those seeking to
slow the fight against
global warming
First, most climate simulations, including ours above and those of IPCC [1], do not include
slow feedbacks such as reduction of ice sheet size
with global warming or release of greenhouse gases from thawing tundra.
[1] CO2 absorbs IR, is the main GHG, human emissions are increasing its concentration in the atmosphere, raising temperatures globally; the second GHG, water vapor, exists in equilibrium
with water / ice, would precipitate out if not for the CO2, so acts as a feedback; since the oceans cover so much of the planet, water is a large positive feedback; melting snow and ice as the atmosphere
warms decreases albedo, another positive feedback, biased toward the poles, which gives larger polar
warming than the
global average; decreasing the temperature gradient from the equator to the poles is reducing the driving forces for the jetstream; the jetstream's meanders are increasing in amplitude and
slowing, just like the lower Missippi River where its driving gradient decreases; the larger
slower meanders increase the amplitude and duration of blocking highs, increasing drought and extreme temperatures — and 30,000 + Europeans and 5,000 plus Russians die, and the US corn crop, Russian wheat crop, and Aussie wildland fire protection fails — or extreme rainfall floods the US, France, Pakistan, Thailand (driving up prices for disk drives — hows that for unexpected adverse impacts from AGW?)
With even further
warming more hydrates are released, additional
global soil feedback (extreme soil respiration rates, compost bomb instability) and weathering becomes a driver, now Ocean very stratified, maybe things like permanent El Nino, weather systems probably move very
slow — everything gets stuck due to lack of perturbed ocean, no or very little frozen water at the poles.
Cumulative emissions of ~ 1000 GtC, sometimes associated
with 2 °C
global warming, would spur «
slow» feedbacks and eventual
warming of 3 - 4 °C
with disastrous consequences.
Updated
with reader - author exchange below, 9:28 p.m. Here's a «Your Dot» contribution on the many benefits of managing fires in forests, savannah and peatlands — including
slowing global warming, protecting threatened ecosystems and reducing noxious palls of haze.
If
global warming does
slow down or partially reverse
with a sunspot crash, industrial polluters and reluctant nations could use it as a justification for turning their backs on pollution controls altogether, makingmatters worse in the long run.
Global warming, on the other hand, is far less of an immediate threat, many of its effects can not be reversed no matter what we do, the cost of attempting such a reversal could destroy the economies of emerging nations and make their development impossible — and it is a
slow moving threat, that governments can plan to deal
with over time.
With this prediction, and the trend toward the
slowing down of the jet stream, is it time to consider / advocate geoengineering as a response to
global warming?
Nobel Prize - winning economist Kenneth Arrow wrote recently that «These calculations [on costs and benefits of
slowing global warming] indicate that, even
with higher discounting, The Stern Review's estimates of future benefits and costs imply that mitigation makes economic sense.»
-- A report from John Fleck examines why the annual distribution of four tons of toxic lead on the streets of Albuquerque, N.M., is not news, and Keith Kloor discusses what this «
slow drip» pollution problem has to do
with global warming.
More specifically, there was
slow global warming,
with large fluctuations, over the century up to 1975 and subsequent rapid
warming of almost 0.2 Â °C per decade.»
More specifically, there was
slow global warming,
with large fluctuations, over the century up to 1975 and subsequent rapid
warming of almost 0.2 Â °C per decade.â $?
Sciencedaily:
With policymakers and political leaders increasingly unable to combat
global climate change, more scientists are considering the use of manual manipulation of the environment to
slow warming's damage to the planet.
The crux of Bates» claim is that NOAA, the federal government's top agency in charge of climate science, published a poorly - researched but widely praised study
with the political goal of disproving the controversial
global warming hiatus theory, which suggests that
global warming slowed down from 1998 until 2012
with little change in globally - averaged surface temperatures — a direct contrast to
global warming advocates» claim that the earth's temperature has been constantly increasing.
Hansen's 2013 paper argued that «cumulative emissions of 1000 billion tons, sometimes associated
with 2C
global warming, would spur «
slow» feedbacks and eventual
warming of 3 - 4C
with disastrous consequences.»
NASA said that there was a high correlation
with global surface temperature (i.e.
global warming occurred from 1880 to 1940 and
slowed considerably after 1950.)
While the
warming of average
global surface temperatures has
slowed (though not nearly as much as previously believed), the overall amount of heat accumulated by the
global climate has not,
with over 90 percent being absorbed by the oceans.
The current
global warming signal is therefore the
slowest and among the smallest in comparison
with all HRWEs in the Vostok record, although the current
warming signal could in the coming decades yet reach the level of past HRWEs for some parameters.
HERE is a lecture by Dr. Jennifer Francis, Rutgers U. documenting the connection between the loss of Arctic ice due to
global warming,
slower moving jet streams
with larger meandering amplitudes, and increases in extreme weather.
Instead, the GISS team says,
global warming over the last century up until 1975 was
slow,
with large fluctuations.
The Washington Post has this dramatic headline:
Global warming is now
slowing down the circulation of the ocean
with potentially dire consequences.
One key element of this latter program will be to try to forge a new coalition between industry and environmental groups for the use of cleanly - produced natural gas as a bridging fuel to
slow global warming over the next few decades —
with a particular focus on China.
To point out just a couple of things: — oceans
warming slower (or cooling
slower) than lands on long - time trends is absolutely normal, because water is more difficult both to
warm or to cool (I mean, we require both a bigger heat flow and more time); at the contrary, I see as a non-sense theory (made by some serrist, but don't know who) that oceans are storing up heat, and that suddenly they will release such heat as a positive feedback: or the water
warms than no heat can be considered ad «stored» (we have no phase change inside oceans, so no latent heat) or oceans begin to release heat but in the same time they have to cool (because they are losing heat); so, I don't feel strange that in last years land temperatures for some series (NCDC and GISS) can be heating up while oceans are slightly cooling, but I feel strange that they are heating up so much to reverse
global trend from slightly negative / stable to slightly positive; but, in the end, all this is not an evidence that lands»
warming is led by UHI (but, this effect, I would not exclude it from having a small part in temperature trends for some regional area, but just small); both because, as writtend, it is normal to have waters
warming slower than lands, and because lands» temperatures are often measured in a not so precise way (despite they continue to give us a
global uncertainity in TT values which is barely the instrumental's one)-- but, to point out, HadCRU and MSU of last years (I mean always 2002 - 2006) follow much better waters» temperatures trend; — metropolis and larger cities temperature trends actually show an increase in UHI effect, but I think the sites are few, and the covered area is very small worldwide, so the
global effect is very poor (but it still can be sensible for regional effects); but I would not run out a small
warming trend for airport measurements due mainly to three things: increasing jet planes traffic, enlarging airports (then more buildings and more asphalt — if you follow motor sports, or simply live in a town / city, you will know how easy they get very
warmer than air during day, and how much it can
slow night - time cooling) and overall having airports nearer to cities (if not becoming an area inside the city after some decade of hurban growth, e.g. Milan - Linate); — I found no point about UHI in towns and villages; you will tell me they are not large cities; but, in comparison
with 20-40-60 years ago when they were «countryside», many small towns and villages have become part of larger hurban areas (at least in Europe and Asia) so examining just larger cities would not be enough in my opinion to get a full view of UHI effect (still remembering that it has a small
global effect: we can say many matters are due to UHI instead of GW, maybe even that a small part of measured GW is due to UHI, and that GW measurements are not so precise to make us able to make good analisyses and predictions, but not that GW is due to UHI).
Given the likelihood that internal variability contributed to the
slowing of
global temperature rise in the last decade, we expect that
warming will resume in the next few years, consistent
with predictions from near - term climate forecasts (Smith et al. 2007; Haines et al. 2009).
With the Earth's heat source cut off,
global warming can be
slowed down, offsetting the effects of burning fossil fuels.
«We didn't find a single paper on the topic that argued the rate of
global warming has not
slowed (or even stopped) in recent years,» wrote scientists Patrick Michaels and Chip Knappenberger
with the libertarian Cato Institute.
Stakeholders across the value chain encouraged Walmart to continue to set aggressive targets,
with a science - based approach tied to the bigger objective of
slowing global warming, according to McMillion.
With the Iowa political caucuses on the horizon in 2007, presidential candidate Barack Obama made homegrown corn a centerpiece of his plan to
slow global warming.
The best hope for the program now is that California, which is intent on battling
global warming, will allow industries to comply
with its rules partly by financing efforts to
slow tropical deforestation.
The idea is to
slow global warming and cure the planet's energy woes, not
with plasma or windmills or «clean» coal smoke, but
with mirrors.
The relatively chilly temperatures compared
with recent years are not evidence that
global warming is
slowing however, say climate scientists at the Met Office.
With assumed
global warming, it is
slow enough to allow counter measures and adaptation to take place.
Besides the
slow demise of the NY Times, here's another major daily newspaper that's gone down the toilet
with its leftist - liberal agenda and moronic servitude to the
global warming religion.
They then applied a simple statistical correction using this relationship
with sea surface temperatures to determine whether internal variability could explain the
slowed global surface
warming.
There are good reasons to
slow down the rate of fossil fuel consumption but those all have to do
with conservation of a finite resource and not a damn thing to do
with global warming because
global warming and more CO2 is a hugely positive thing for the primary producers in food chain — green plants.
We already know that if we continue
with the lifestyles we have in most of the Western world, we'll never be able to meet sustainability goals or our need to lower carbon emissions to deal
with and
slow global warming.
DO NOT INCLUDE
SLOW FEEDBACKS such as reduction of ice sheet size
with global warming or release of greenhouse gases from thawing tundra.
Headache: The evidence is beginning to suggest that
global warming may be happening much
slower than the catastrophists have claimed - a conclusion
with enormous policy implications for politicians at Westminster, pictured
Since I wrote one of the first books for a general audience about
global warming way back in 1989, and since I've spent the intervening decades working ineffectively to
slow that
warming, I can say
with some confidence that we're losing the fight, badly and quickly — losing it because, most of all, we remain in denial about the peril that human civilization is in.
First, most climate simulations, including ours above and those of IPCC [1], do not include
slow feedbacks such as reduction of ice sheet size
with global warming or release of greenhouse gases from thawing tundra.
«If we're going to
slow the rate of
global warming,» said Chris Meyer, a senior manager with the Environmental Defense Fund, and familiar with the discussions at the Global Landscape Forum, «we need to accelerate the exchange between policymakers, scientists and farmers.&
global warming,» said Chris Meyer, a senior manager
with the Environmental Defense Fund, and familiar
with the discussions at the
Global Landscape Forum, «we need to accelerate the exchange between policymakers, scientists and farmers.&
Global Landscape Forum, «we need to accelerate the exchange between policymakers, scientists and farmers.»
Plain Language Summary:
Global and regional
warming trends over the course of the twentieth century have been nonuniform,
with decadal and longer periods of faster or
slower warming, or even cooling.