Further, forest management policies should combine environmental policy
with socioeconomic development as well as establish moratoriums to increase effectiveness.
Not exact matches
Alexander Chan is a Hongkonger
with a fond interest in China & Hong Kong's political and
socioeconomic development, especially issues related to social mobility.
Several studies have also attempted to understand the role of breastfeeding on IQ, and although some authors conclude that the observed advantage of breastfeeding on IQ is related only to genetic and socioenvironmental factors, a recent meta - analysis showed that after adjustment for appropriate key co-factors, breastfeeding was associated
with significantly higher scores for cognitive
development than formula feeding.6 Longer duration of breastfeeding has also been positively associated
with intelligence in adulthood.22 We also observed the benefits of long - term breastfeeding on mental indices, along
with the indirect benefit of balancing the impact of exposure to p, p ′ DDE after adjustment for some
socioeconomic variables.
Being breastfed exclusively for at least four months has been shown to have a positive effect on the intellectual
development of children even when controlled for the demographic variables, especially
socioeconomic status (SES) and education of the mother.14 - 22 The nutrient advantages of human milk coupled
with the mother - infant relationship provide the matrix for the child to reach his / her full intellectual potential.
This is after taking account other important factors associated
with poor child
development such as
socioeconomic disadvantage, lower maternal age, maternal smoking in pregnancy and fetal growth restriction.
Several socio - ecological factors — including more frequent disasters, less prevalent infectious disease, and less climatic stress in poorer countries — were linked
with individualism, but increased
socioeconomic development was the strongest predictor of increased individualism over time.
«The fact that most of the countries that did not show an increase in individualist values were among the lowest in
socioeconomic development over the time period examined is consistent
with the observation that
socioeconomic development drove the rise in individualism,» the researchers explain in their paper.
People
with fewer
socioeconomic resources — less education, lower income — have less healthy diets, may be less physically active and have poorer quality sleep, all of which lead to the early
development of heart disease risk factors.
They found that increasing maternal C - reactive protein levels were significantly associated
with development of schizophrenia in offspring and remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders such as parental history of psychiatric disorders, twin / singleton birth, location of birth, and maternal
socioeconomic status.
Lesaux's research focuses on the reading
development and the health and well - being of children who are at risk for learning difficulties, including children from language - minority and low
socioeconomic backgrounds, and children
with language impairments.
«Meredith Rowe is an expert on language and cognitive
development during early childhood,
with a focus on the role that parents,
socioeconomic status, culture, and experience play in
development»
Based on Partners in Education: A Dual Capacity - Building Framework for Family — School Partnerships, a publication of the American Institutes for Research's Southwest Educational
Development Laboratory in collaboration
with the U.S. Department of Education, this session will help you to build and enhance the capacity of school staff and teachers use equity to engage all families, regardless of their racial or ethnic identity, educational background, gender, disability, or
socioeconomic status.
First, it was found that both fourth - and eighth - grade rural and urban students of lower
socioeconomic status (SES) had fewer teachers
with recent professional
development in computers and mathematics education and had less access to home computers than did suburban students.
Binary metrics such as whether a household has an electricity connection, and whether a household cooks
with non-solid fuels, do not help us understand the phenomenon of expanding energy access and how it impacts
socioeconomic development.
The first point to dispense
with is the reference to Sections 3.2.2.7 and 3.6.4 in support of the claim that «the locations of greatest
socioeconomic development are also those that have been most warmed by atmospheric circulation changes.»
The relationship between resilience in the face of extreme weather events and increases in female education expenditure holds when
socioeconomic development continues but the climate does not change, and
socioeconomic development continues
with weather paths driven by «wet» and «dry» Global Climate Models.
The sentence in question is this: «Hence, the correlation of warming
with industrial and
socioeconomic development ceases to be statistically significant.»
Urban - Rural comparison isn't going to encompass all
socioeconomic factors or all climatic factors relevant for determining the trend associated
with development or lack thereof.
• Demonstrated ability to work
with children in groups or individually depending on the requirements of children and the subject matter • Able to organize activities so children can learn in relation to the world, explore interests, and build up talents • Highly skilled in planning and carrying out a set of courses that targets diverse areas of child
development, including language, math, and social skills • Proven ability to work
with children from diverse cultural and
socioeconomic backgrounds
Its validity and sensitivity as an indicator of socioenvironmental influences on
development have been demonstrated by evidence that it explains significant variance in childhood cognitive functioning over and above that attributable to
socioeconomic status (SES) and maternal education.40, 41 Its validity for use
with black samples has also been established.42 Because of safety considerations, the HOME was administered in the laboratory.
Strong gradients of association between childhood
socioeconomic conditions and adult health have been consistently observed in a number of British, and other, populations at various stages within their life course,
with outcomes considered including all - cause mortality, general health measures and specific causes of mortality and morbidity.1 — 10 This study continues to provide clear evidence for association between childhood
socioeconomic deprivation and adult general health and mental well - being, even considered within a broad context of child well - being including other aspects of family background, health and
development.
Evidence is provided that there is not just a health gradient associated
with socioeconomic status, but several gradients across disadvantage and
development measures.
Parenting support programs have been shown to have positive effects among families
with young infants at high psychosocial risk.20 - 25 Our results suggest a benefit from the universal provision of parenting and child
development support services to an unselected sample of families
with health coverage, who ranged from the affluent and employed to those at greater
socioeconomic and psychosocial risk.
Small size at birth is associated
with a range of adverse health outcomes, 1 including poor cognitive
development, 2 an effect that is largely unconfounded by features of the family environment, such as
socioeconomic status and birth order.
Taylor et al argue that the important facets of positive parenting are undermined by the presence of certain
socioeconomic conditions, in particular that unemployment, low income, and lack of social support is associated
with more punitive and coercive discipline, more rejecting, less warm behaviours, and more aggressive parenting strategies affecting the behavioural, educational, and social
development of children.
(Swartz, 2012) Historically, the
development of the DV shelter movement and community - based interventions emerged from predominantly Caucasian populations
with an upper - middle class
socioeconomic status.
Higher levels of positive
development in emerging adulthood were associated
with stronger family and peer relationships, better adjustment to the school setting, higher family
socioeconomic status, and better emotional control.
Although the above studies were conducted
with primarily Caucasian, middle - class samples, there is also evidence to suggest that among low
socioeconomic status (SES) samples
with poor metabolic control externalizing symptoms may be more highly linked to the
development of poor health outcomes than internalizing symptoms.