Gould reports that adult children of divorced parents report less satisfaction
with sole custody arrangements than any other arrangement, and an assortment of behavior problems are associated with loss of contact with one parent.
Further, in his book «The Scientific Basis of Child Custody Decisions,» Robert Galatzer - Levy reports that parents report less satisfaction
with sole custody arrangements.
Not exact matches
An additional 9 % are fathers
with sole custody, and the remaining 4 % is split
custody with multiple - child families and different
arrangements for each child.
Yet preschool children in
sole custody arrangements are the group most at risk of losing contact
with their non-custodial parents.
In 2000, a report by Justice Canada found that mothers were awarded
sole custody in around 79 per cent of court - ordered
custody arrangements, compared
with just seven per cent of fathers.
You may wonder who will get
sole custody of your child or if your ex-spouse will cooperate
with the
arrangement.
While some courts still award
sole custody to mom or to dad, many courts take a broader look at parenting and work out a
custody / visitation
arrangement that maximizes the kids» time
with each parent.
A Justice Canada report from 2000 found that mothers were awarded
sole custody in around 79 per cent of court - ordered
custody arrangements, compared
with just seven per cent of fathers.
If a parent
with sole custody prevents the non-custodial parent from visitation, the
custody arrangements may be reevaluated.
The first is a
sole custody arrangement in which the child lives
with the parent who has the responsibility for providing daily childcare and making decisions about the child's religion, schooling, and medical care.
In comparison to children in
sole custody arrangements, children in joint
custody arrangements who spend at least 35 percent of their time
with each of their parents enjoy the following benefits:
The court may order
sole legal
custody with shared physical
custody, joint legal
custody with sole physical
custody or make other
custody arrangements.
The court may award one of three types of
custody arrangements: joint legal
custody to both parents, where one parent is responsible for residential
custody; joint physical
custody, where both parents provide homes for the child; or
sole custody to one parent
with visitation, also called «parenting time,» allowed to the non-custodial parent.
Depending upon the
arrangements, physical
custody may be
sole or joint, but
sole custody with the mother is more the norm.
In contrast, a
sole custody arrangement with visitation requires minimal ex-spouse contact, and allows you both greater freedoms to move forward in your lives.
The parenting plan must identify both parents, identify the child or children subject to the plan, state whether both parents agree to the plan, identify a preference for
sole custody or joint
custody with respect to decision - making authority concerning various aspects of the child's life, and describe preferred visitation
arrangements.
Sole custody is an
arrangement in which one parent has
sole decision - making authority and is the parent
with whom the child lives.
Mother had
sole custody and father had specific non-overnight access two afternoons a week and alternate Sundays — Both mother and father were good parents — Mother had shown flexibility
with respect to access
arrangements, however father had acted in immature and inflexible manner
In 2000, a report by Justice Canada found that mothers were awarded
sole custody in around 79 per cent of court - ordered
custody arrangements, compared
with just seven per cent of fathers.
You have a
sole custody arrangement if your child spends more than 60 percent of the time
with one of you over the course of a year.
Further, as respecting possible modification, because of past issues of the defendant failing to comply
with orders of the court; providing token compliance
with orders of the court while ignoring the spirit and intent of the orders (including the orders dated December 1, 2010); the defendant's lengthy pattern of contemptuous conduct; the expenses and financial waste caused by the defendant; the substantial financial drain on the resources of the plaintiff and the guardian ad litem caused by the defendant; the pattern of parental alienation; prior false reports of abuse and / or neglect to governmental entities; and the need for repose on the part of the minor child, it is anticipated that in addition to satisfaction of the foregoing conditions, no modification motion is permitted to be filed by defendant regarding the
sole physical and / or
sole legal
custody arrangements, except in the case of the plaintiff's total and permanent disability as determined by the Social Security Administration, unless the following conditions are satisfied...» Eisenlohr v. Eisenlohr, 2011 WL 1566201 at * 4 (Conn.Super.).
Shared
custody agreements tend to be more complicated than
sole custody arrangements because the amount of time that the child spends
with each parent can affect child support awards as well as the child's legal residence for school.
In a
sole custody arrangement, the child spends most of his or her time
with one parent, and less than two nights per week
with the other parent,
with some exceptions for vacations and holidays.
If a Connecticut family court does not order joint
custody, it may order alternative
custody arrangements, such as awarding
sole physical
custody to one parent
with appropriate visitation for the child
with the non-custodial parent.
A
sole physical
custody arrangement has the child living primarily
with one parent and visiting the other parent.
If parties have a joint
custody arrangement, the parent seeking modification of
custody must show how both parents are unable to cooperate
with one another and agree on the best interests of the child; thus,
sole custody would be a more appropriate
arrangement.
To say that joint
custody «is associated
with» reduced parent conflict is to ignore that more amicable parents would be more likely to voluntarily choose this
arrangement (whereas the dataset of
sole custody homes would include, among others, most of the families
with severe abuse issues.)
In 2000, a report by Justice Canada found that mothers were awarded
sole custody in around 79 percent of court - ordered
custody arrangements, compared
with just seven percent of fathers.
Approximately one third of the children were in joint physical
custody arrangements averaging 12 days per month
with the less - seen parent,
with the others in either mother or father
sole physical
custody averaging 4 days a month
with the less - seen parent.
However, the study did find that more frequent contact between parents in either joint or
sole custody arrangements was «associated
with more emotional and behavioral problems in the children.»
Shared physical
custody means a child lives part of the time
with each parent, having more frequent and substantial contact
with each parent than under a
sole custody arrangement, in which one parent has primary physical
custody and the other has occasional visitation.
The data regarding joint
custody shows that most
arrangements called joint
custody are actually very similar to
sole custody with access
arrangements.
Joint
custody can also refer to joint physical
custody, in which the child spends time
with each parent, either on a roughly even basis or in blocks of time that are, in effect, no greater than visitation under a
sole custody arrangement.
In practice, it frequently devolves post-order and over time into a time - share
arrangement that differs little from traditional
sole custody with visitation (but differs a lot in the amount of the child support order.)