Sentences with phrase «with subjective questions»

By creating a test with subjective questions, your teacher is setting himself / herself up for hours of grading.

Not exact matches

The principle is that in regard to the presentation of subjective aims, God has to «speak» to each actual occasion in its own «language,» that is, at its own level, in a manner harmonious with the character of the sort of data which are in general operative in the aesthetic synthesis which is the concrescence of the actual occasion in question.

Therefore two prehensions may have the same spatio - temporal standpoint but still differ if the subjects in question differ in the unity of their subjective immediacies.73 But though in this he sides with Cobb, Ford faults Cobb on the very point Wilcox raises.74 For while God, in Cobb's view, is omnispatial, he is not omnitemporal.

The further question, of whether this kind of «memory» which preserves the reality of such valued data in the divine life, also carries with it what we might describe as subjective immortality, is not discussed in Whitehead's essay.

Still more subjective is my opinion that even in the physical sciences there is a dawning awareness of the need to wrestle again with the questions on which Whitehead cast so much light.

DISCLAIMER: The question can be interpreted two ways: (1) «What are the reasons not to provide» - which is a subjective question because not everyone agrees with said reasons; and (2) as @J.

with the question marks acknowledging the «subjective nature of our deduction.»

Finally, I have them email me a link to their spreadsheet, along with any other subjective notes or questions they have.

Thus far, the «professional» reviews have been highly subjective, presented offensive speech that has little to do with the game in question, and even contained blatant inaccuracies concerning the game's content.

over Julie is a stretch not only because of the admittedly subjective question of attractiveness (with my eye as the beholder, Cruz is no beauty), but also because Cruz is a breathtakingly awful actress — it's Sofia Coppola - impossible to believe that anyone would betray love for her without an ulterior motive.

However, The Age of Rage isn't so much asking the question of how we got here, but instead purely capturing one of the most tumultuous political periods in American history, with an unflinching (somewhat) subjective eye that isn't afraid to get intimate with individuals who possess the most extreme sets of values.

As any researcher can immediately note, such surveys have little usefulness as objective evidence, because they are based on subjective opinions that can change based on who is working in classrooms, because survey designs can be flawed with leading questions yielding results favorable to the pollster, and because survey designs can change drastically from year to year.

Using data from a midsize Florida school district, this paper explores both questions by calculating teachers» «value added» and comparing those outcomes with subjective ratings of teachers by school principals.

The construction of the Reference Capitalization index allows Arnott et al to «make direct comparisons with the Fundamental Indexes uncomplicated by questions of float, market impact, subjective selections, and so forth.»

All this raises the question: if I'm reasonably assured of good long term returns with Graham's mechanical quant approach (based on extensive backtesting by multiple authors including Ben Graham, Tobias Carlisle, Joel Greenblatt, James Montier, etc.), then why would I jeopardize these reasonably assured good returns — and risk incurring unrecoverable opportunity costs over my limited lifespan — by following a concentrated approach that depends on subjective, accurate assessments of sustainable competitive advantage?

Of course, comfort is somewhat subjective, and I soon decided that being jolted around on a pile of blankets atop a camel's hump would have been more relaxing than sitting on a bag that contained the animal's breakfast, with the camel in question following close behind looking for his morning snack.

While the recent upsurge of feminist activity in this country has indeed been a liberating one, its force has been chiefly emotional — personal, psychological and subjective — centered, like the other radical movements to which it is related, on the present and its immediate needs, rather than on historical analysis of the basic intellectual issues which the feminist attack on the status quo automatically raises.1 Like any revolution, however, the feminist one ultimately must come to grips with the intellectual and ideological basis of the various intellectual or scholarly disciplines — history, philosophy, sociology, psychology, etc. — in the same way that it questions the ideologies of present social institutions.

Not to be Taken Performance Series invites select artists and thinkers to publicly use elsetime as a generative studio space in which she can engage questions about legacy and politics, place and time, through discrete actions; these subjective, ephemeral responses momentarily transform the exhibition with the performer's unique potential.

Not to be Taken invites select artists and thinkers to publicly use elsetime as a generative studio space in which she can engage questions about legacy and politics, place and time, through discrete actions; these subjective, ephemeral responses momentarily transform the exhibition with the performer's unique potential.

For these artists, who were in their 30s and 40s during the 1980s, it was not a question of a «return to painting,» but, rather, of finding a bridge between the radical, deconstructive abstraction of the late 1960s and 1970s (which many of them had been marked by) with a larger painting history and more subjective approaches.

As one poster noted, with this subjective definition, it seems like the test for whether something is a black swan is run on the audience in question, rather than the information itself.

* According to the Berkeley group, the Earth's surface temperature will have risen (on average) slightly less than what indicated by NASA, NOAA and the Met Office * Differences will be on the edge of statistical significance, leaving a lot open to subjective interpretation * Several attempts will be made by climate change conformists and True Believers to smear the work of BEST, and to prevent them from publishing their data * After publication, organised groups of people will try to cloud the issue to the point of leaving the public unsure about what exactly was found by BEST * New questions will be raised regarding UHI, however the next IPCC assessment's first draft will be singularly forgetful of any peer - reviewed paper on the topic * We will all be left with a slightly - warming world, the only other certitude being that all mitigation efforts will be among the stupidest ideas that ever sprung to human mind.

I'm going to try to transform those two subjective questions into one objective one: Which rules do the best legal writers invoke and apply with confidence?

As a matter of policy, the law required an objective standard to screen claims: «[65]... Given the frequency with which everyday experiences cause transient distress, the multi-factorial causes of psychological upset, and the highly subjective nature of an individual's reaction to such stresses and strains, such claims involve serious questions of evidentiary rigour.»

Placing an onus on the applicant to substantiate the general importance of their issues in the context of their particular claim seems like a lot to ask of them, and moreover the assessment by a justice in chambers on what constitutes a question of general importance or one with a reasonable prospect of success seems like a very subjective assessment from my review of decisions in this area.

Well - being is measured with the WHO Well - Being Index (WHO - 5), 156 which consists of 5 questions assessing the subjective well - being of the respondents.