Two were released without charge, while the remaining men were charged
with terrorist offences relating to fundraising.
Even more concerning was that only person on whom a control order was imposed was later charged
with a terrorist offence, and even in that case he was not convicted.
Not exact matches
A preliminary report by peers and MPs today finds new
offences of encouragement of terrorism and attending
terrorist training camps could be incompatible
with the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR).
And the forthcoming Counter Terrorism Bill will propose additional penalties for
terrorists charged
with other criminal
offences.
For the first time in Canadian legal history, a definition for «
terrorist activity,» together
with several new terrorism - related
offences, was written into our Criminal Code.
At minimum, the
offence prohibits private and public speech advocating or promoting any of the several terrorism
offences in the Criminal Code, some of which are non-violent
offences, as well as speech advocating or promoting indictable criminal
offences committed for the sake of or in association
with terrorist groups.
Consequently, the substantive curtailment of a mens rea requirement for the definition of «facilitation» of a
terrorist offence is disturbing, since it does the opposite of being commensurate
with the assured gravity of the
offence or its punishment.
The legislation raises a plethora of issues and significantly alters the security landscape: It gives the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) powers beyond intelligence gathering (to actively target threats and derail plots); creates new
offences (criminalizing «
terrorist propaganda» and the «promotion of terror»); lowers the legal threshold to trigger detention to those who may carry out an
offence from the existing standard of will carry out to may carry out; extends preventive detention for «suspected»
terrorists from three days to seven days (inconsistent
with the constitutional presumption of innocence); legally entrenches a no fly list; and grants government agencies explicit authority to share private information
with domestic and foreign entities.
A 16 - year - old boy, the youngest on trial for terrorism
offences in Canada, has been found guilty by a Quebec youth court judge of committing a robbery in association
with a
terrorist organization and planning to leave Canada to join a jihadist group abroad.
They also do not know that suspicious transaction monitoring requires screening for the identity of
terrorist groups to determine whether they are dealing
with funds owned by a
terrorist group that may involve a
terrorist activity financing
offence.