Sentences with phrase «with text books»

However, all of the efforts have not been without the occasional brush with the law, as book publishers have not taken too kindly to Diaz's efforts to provide students with text books for free.

I knew in my heart as I worked towards Nursing School that something was missing... A vital holistic level of my education that I couldn't fill with text books and classes.

As most people go to church for only and hour on the Pagan sun god's day of worship, and only get a very watered down feel good sermon with a text book drummed into them interpretation, there is very little Bible and Scripture in church.

In a person with text book alignment, the head will be between the upper arms — but of course, exact placement of the neck will depend on your specific anatomy.

Not surprisingly, Sophia is bored with her text book!

[DC: The problems with this text book go well beyond a few «inadvertantly missing» attributions.

Folk wisdom doesn't come with a text book on parasitology.

Familiarity with all text book software Power point developed for legal subjects Westlaw, Lexis / Nexis and all legal software Blackboard Developed relevant new curricula utilizing mass media materials Thirty years legal experience in litigation and business law at federal and state level.

Not exact matches

It was with these subjects in mind that he cleverly and deliberately had the book formatted to be the same size and shape of an iPad Air, which changed how he wrote and presented the text and page layout.

Lichtenfeld covers all the basics: stay active and healthy, exercise, play sports, eat right, socialize a lot with family and friends, meet new friends, keep learning, do volunteer work, be involved in your community, run for office, attend church or other religious / spiritual activities, read books and newspapers, check your email and text your friends.

The Bible is a book, and was «edited» by humans for the telling of a good «story», as with any «good book» there can be many (mis --RRB- interpretations of the text.

If you disagree with my interpretation (and it is sincerely how I interpet the text), ask yourself how it is that your «god» couldn't come up with a better way to communicate than a book that is so readily subject to so many interpretations and to being taken «out of context», and has so many mistakes in it.

To ignore these principles of interpretation is to distort the text just as much as if you ignored the principle of reading poetry as poetry with all the rich meaning of figurative language and chose rather to read it like it was a science text book.

= > no fiction book ever says that I pointed out the text analysis that person did to juxtapose it with the authenticity of the biblical narrative.

225 of these are Biblical Scrolls with the text of the Hebrew Old Testament books.

I think we all (Christians included) should understand that the intent of the book of Genesis was not to be a scientific text book, but an account of God's relationship with man.

books worth reading Texts from Jane Eyre: And Other Conversations with Your Favorite Literary Characters by Mallory Ortberg.

Books like Holy Hilarity help us break out of the box of reading the Bible with straight faces, so that we can see the truth in the text.

In the book, I make a brief but impassioned case for reading the text with the prejudice of love, a hermeneutic I believe was employed by Jesus, and, as many reviewers have pointed out, a hermeneutic that Augustine also favored.

As to whether or not we must affirm that the flood encompassed the entire orb of the earth, the text would seem to teach this and subsequent texts would tend to corroborate this, but there is some flexibility with regards to the first eleven chapters of the Book of Genesis, as expressed in the encyclical «Humani Generis» of Pope Pius XII:

I want to add to this list my own expressions of thanks to those who made what might have been a difficult undertaking a rewarding one instead: Ruth Hopewell, who gave me the privilege of editing the book and consistently aided me in doing so; the Directors of Auburn Seminary, who granted a generous leave for my work on the project in Atlanta; Jim Waits and Elizabeth Smith, who anticipated everything I would need for the work to be done comfortably and efficiently; Lurline and James Fowler, who provided housing and friendship; Channing Jeschke, Candler's librarian, who made available and helped to arrange Hopewell's books and papers; Brooks Holifield, who worked with me on the last and knottiest problems in the text; and David Kelsey, on whose encouragement and sagacity I relied heavily when my assignment seemed most formidable.

Or do we need to do with the New Testament as is sometimes done with the Book of Daniel — parts of it included in the text as canonical, parts of it relegated to an appendix of Apocrypha?

He may also be faced with incomprehension and hostility when he tries to persuade the school not to support «Red Nose Day» or «Jeans for Genes»; when he suggests that asking pupils to stand at the front of the class and shout out the names of intimate body parts is an invasion of their modesty; when he objects to the non-Catholic geography teacher's presentation of solutions for over-population, the «gay rights» agenda seeping in through text books, the chaplaincyco - ordinator's failure to get abortion agency leaflets removed from the library, or the school nurse's distribution of cards with information on how to get the morning - after pill.

When Rob Bell released Love Wins, a book that made a compelling biblical case against the exclusivist theology that all non-Christians will be condemned to eternal conscious torment in hell, the Southern Baptist Convention released a resolution that stated: «Being troubled, even deeply troubled, by the implications of the biblical text does not give us a reason to abandon the text or force it into a mold that rests comfortably with us.

In most books, only the final view is evident, for authors seek to revise earlier positions to conform with the final one.6 All three notions are present in the text, however, for Whitehead in revising did not erase all traces of his earlier formulations.

My problems with this book are the same problems I have with nearly all books about biblical criticism: I believe the presuppositions of most of those who engage in biblical criticism are inherently flawed, and as a result, short - circuit the creative thinking that is necessary to discover solutions to the so - called problems in the biblical text.

Having thus stated the text that governs this book, it may be helpful now to say a few words about context — to indicate some contrasts and kinships with other movements and writers past and present.

After the flood, we will begin to work our way through some of the violent texts in Scripture, until we eventually arrive at the Book of Revelation, and then conclude with a study on Hell.

I have ventured into writing commentaries on the biblical books in Malayalam, approaching the Bible in two senses of the word, layman: namely, inadequate scientific understanding of the text but primarily concerned with response to life - situations.

The remainder of the book (chapters 4 — 7) provide a detailed explanation of how to study and teach the texts of the General Epistles, beginning with interpreting them from the Greek and moving on into exegetical outlines and homiletical exposition.

Anyone who spends time browsing there will find the stalls flooded with books that apply a hermeneutic of suspicion to biblical texts.

In this method, take notes on everything surrounding your decision, such as lists of pros and cons, notes on books you're reading, God's messages to you through the Bible, conversations with others, recounts of key events, copies of important e - mails / letters or transcripts of texts / chats / voicemails, questions you have, and so on.

Scholars were not satisfied only with producing the most accurate text of the Bible; they also wanted to know how the Bible came into being, when its various parts were written, the total surroundings in which the various books were written, and the consequence of all this for an understanding of the Christian faith.

but its not a simple question, we would need a scientific text book to provide you with the answers to all the questions you asked.

after much thinking the calts called the Denisova the Elves (the children o Danu) and the Neanderthal the Fomorii (children of Danu) we were hums (the children of MIll) in their mythological text making the pretanic religion older and with a biblical story of the creation making them closer to the true religion,... what the mahabharata is an older text what the book of Tets has an even older creation

The warnings against Jehovah's Witnesses have stacked up over the past decade in particular, with dozens of regional charges of extremism and more than 80 of its books, pamphlets, and other texts (including its magazine, The Watchtower) banned in Russia, according to The Moscow Times.

So before opening the first page of the text we have a strong indication that we're dealing with a good book.

There very well may be a God, and I believe there is, but you put him in a box with your dogma, and you'll never find any truths that way, because you shut your mind to new knowledge under the delusion that you already have it all contained in a book, written by men, whom you've already stated have altered the text with lies.

The published German text was carefully corrected against the original manuscripts, and Bonhoeffer's work on his book was correlated to references in diaries and letters to produce a detailed account of when and where he produced the manuscripts that remain, These are presented in the order he wrote them, with notes, afterword and appendices that connect the text to the books he was reading, the places where he was working, and other things that were happening in his world.

I had a fascinating conversation with Max Stackhouse of Andover - Newton Seminary who felt that one of our greatest needs in the subject area of this book was for an examination of the history of preaching on certain texts as the «Rich Young Ruler» to see how sermons related to different contexts.

Hidden allusions are never easy to be sure of and particularly is this the case with an ancient text, but one can at least see the reasons why Martin - Achard comes to the conclusion that these verses from the book of Hosea not only apply the idiom of resurrection to Israel's hope for the future, but also show where it came from.

with the exception of some small bits out of the books of the prophets — virtually none of the other biblical scribblings were contemporaneous with events described within them, and ALL of the texts were subject to revision for a really long time from people who came along after they were originally written.

In 1996, the Smithsonian Institute issued a statement addressing claims made in the Book of Mormon, stating that the text is primarily a religious text and that archeologists affiliated with the institute found «no direct connection between the archeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book&raqBook of Mormon, stating that the text is primarily a religious text and that archeologists affiliated with the institute found «no direct connection between the archeology of the New World and the subject matter of the book&raqbook».

And just as with the book, every entry looks at several texts from the Bible to help you better understand them.

A refusal to make use of these tools to ascertain the proper text reading, its relation to other literature, and the cultural - historical milieu out of which it arose, is a move toward dishonesty prompted either by a fear of what might be discovered or by an impatience to get a sermon that can not tarry at books that are not heavy with homiletical fruit.

«Evolution should enjoy the same status and would if it didn't conflict with the literal words in a text sacred to many» = > It does not conflict with the Bible which is one of the reasons it stands out among holy books.

Mike, if I were a biblical literalist I would have a problem with the Book of Job; but it is a very ancient text and speaks to a people for whom Satan was often suspected of being more powerful than God.

I am quite comfortable with many questions concerning the Bible, yet remain a believer, and enjoy the book's text often.

In this book he presents excerpts from his own translation with a commentary punctuating the text.

Well that really started in Texas politics when Rove told Bush if he wanted to succeed he had to strongly identify with the Christian faith as that was an important factor in the area — low and behold, Bush became a born - again Christian... even though he is a text - book example of a sociopathic personality, without a conscience, and that really becomes an impossibility (although sociopaths are quite capable of faking most anything).