Sentences with phrase «with the distinction by»

The actress, who was honored with the distinction by People magazine, is... Read More

The actress, who was honored with the distinction by People magazine, is also, of course, a noted globe - trotter and friend to the travel world.

In addition, I passed a Tech Pipefitter Qualification Test with distinction by virtue of both my extreme devotion for the pipefitting business and more than two thousands apprentice hours during which I learned the trade.

Not exact matches

This distinction comes with a real perk: the candidates hired or promoted through the process are eligible to attend a two - day client forum in 2018, attended by 55 corporate in - house legal honchos there to network, mentor and perhaps offer lucrative new business.

Instead, Facebook's PR team and lower ranking leaders have led the company's defense by drawing technical distinctions between what happened and more common breaches by hackers, and by pointing out that Facebook curtailed the amount of user data it shared with app makers in 2014.

Let me conclude by saying publicly «au revoir» to our good friend and colleague, Deputy Governor Agathe Côté, who served the Bank with distinction for over 32 years.

Despite that distinction, President Barack Obama is one of her biggest fans: In his speech last year pushing the Department of Labor to press on with its fiduciary standard rule, he pointed out Garrett by name as an FA who puts the best interests of her clients first.

A common frustration shared by both family offices and those hoping to work with family offices is the experience of a person misrepresenting themselves as a family office or ultra-high-net-worth individual only to find that the person is either exaggerating, lying, or simply misunderstanding the distinction between a large single family office and an upper - class family.

Awarded as the «Best Spanish Fund Manager in the World» by Citywire in its 2012 edition, and rated with an AA - rating distinction.

With the ICB, companies doing business with consumers are divided into providers of goods and providers of services; with the GICS, companies are classified by cyclical / non-cyclical distinctions, or between discretionary spending and the staples of everyday lWith the ICB, companies doing business with consumers are divided into providers of goods and providers of services; with the GICS, companies are classified by cyclical / non-cyclical distinctions, or between discretionary spending and the staples of everyday lwith consumers are divided into providers of goods and providers of services; with the GICS, companies are classified by cyclical / non-cyclical distinctions, or between discretionary spending and the staples of everyday lwith the GICS, companies are classified by cyclical / non-cyclical distinctions, or between discretionary spending and the staples of everyday life.

According to Austin, in light of the polices implemented by the previous Canadian government to restrict Chinese SOE investment into Canada, this SOE distinction is worth making at the level of government as well, if greater economic exchange with China is on the horizon for Canada.

While popular with the press, the SBAs report, by design, does not make a key distinction.

Al - Naji is joined in the project by ex-Googler, Lawrence Diao, and machine learning expert Josh Chen — all three graduated summa cum laude (with the highest distinction) in Computer Science from Princeton.

On the one hand, their field is flourishing: No longer intimidated by the logical positivists (who denied truth to moral assertions except as expressions of likes and dislikes), thinkers as diverse as Iris Murdoch, Martha Nussbaum, and Bernard Williams are leading the attack against such debilitating philosophical notions as Hume's notorious «Is / Ought» distinction and Kant's simplistic fusion of morality with mere duty.

It sounds very much as though Reno shares with Rahner the famous distinction, in itself little adduced by Reno, between «transcendental» and «categorical» theology.

Even so, Schickel has been criticized in the past for abetting liberalism via relativism and lack of commitment, an argument he counters by appealing to the distinction between doctrine, which is permanent, and discipline (ritual, language, and arts), which changes with the times.

It is also in tension with making a very sharp a distinction between what has been canonized by the church and other writings by faithful Jews and Christians.

Finally, in the justly famous, but very obscure section of «Force and the Understanding» known as the «Inverted World,» the metaphysical distinction inherent in all designations such as inner - outer, intelligible - sensible, noumenal - phenomenal collapses, and with it the attempt of substance or «essence» metaphysics to evade contradiction by locating «contradictories» (or contraries) in ontologically disparate realms.

Modern expositions of logic have attempted to take account of this circumstance by opposing, — in accordance with a well - known distinction of Hegel's — the abstract universality of the concept to the concrete universality of the mathematical formula.

Everyone understood that Lorenzelli's «XXIV Theses» were aimed in the direction of the sixteenth - century Jesuit scholastic philosopher Francisco Suárez, beginning with the doctrine of the real distinction between essence and existence in creatures, which was not generally held by his followers.

Insofar as this question is addressed by Brightman, it is with a distinction he makes in the concept of «the given.»

These previous points once again are believed by many religions, but there are also many religions that don't make this clear distinction as with some forms of Hinduism, Buddhism, Taoism and others which believe in the transmigration of the soul through reincarnation from humans to animals and vice versa.

All Nye is saying is, the future successful development of America and the world depends on people who understand the distinction, and who can relate to and interact with the natural world scientifically and objectively, without being constrained by belief in the creation story or any other explanation of the world not supported by facts and evidence.

The distinction between the nuclear and traditional family was also blurred in the recent report on human sexuality by the Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) titled Keeping Body and Soul Together: «Although many Christians in the post-World War II era have a special emotional attachment to the nuclear family, with its employed father, mother at home, and two or more school - aged children, that profile currently fits only 5 percent of North American households.»

In his review of Fundamentalism Observed, edited by Martin E. Marty and R. Scott Appleby, Wuthnow describes the commonalities and distinctions among various religious fundamental movements in the world and corrects numerous myths and misunderstandings about fundamentalism with scholarly research.

In the debates over humanitarian intervention in the 1990s some moralists made a distinction between «war,» which they understood as having to do with state uses of armed force for their own interests, and intervention by military force for humanitarian purposes, which they regarded as altruistic and not «war.»

His contention is that Whitehead's move from Trend I, the delineation of types of existence, to Trend II, in which Whitehead has assigned some order of «priority» among the types, is incoherent, that it involves the arbitrary introduction of some other principle not required by, and indeed inconsistent with, that upon which the distinction into types is made.

My own approach has been to turn to a naturalistic development of the scheme and suggest that by distinguishing between the remote past and the immediate past (a distinction other commentators, surprisingly, have not insisted upon) and dealing with each separately, a coherent account can be obtained.

To offer a tendentious example, insofar as Dante's powers of writing exceed my own (which is to say, by a lot), he attained a greater degree of distinction with respect to that power than I.

To turn now to my suggestions about reconception, I must begin with a refutation of the sharp distinction, often proposed by those who call themselves biblical theologians, between what are said to be the Jewish and the Hellenistic views of history.

Willimon cites a «classic article» by Richard Lischer, «The Limits of Story,» as testimony to «what story and narrative preaching can not do,» while failing to note Lischer's distinction between Craddock and those who equate preaching with storytelling.

This perspective unmistakably reveals the unwholesomeness, not to put it more strongly, of our way of life: our obsession with sex, violence, and the pornography of «making it;» our addictive dependence on drugs, «entertainment,» and the evening news; our impatience with anything that limits our sovereign freedom of choice, especially with the constraints of marital and familial ties; our preference for «nonbinding commitments;» our third - rate educational system; our third - rate morality; our refusal to draw a distinction between right and wrong, lest we «impose» their morality on us; our reluctance to judge or be judged; our indifference to the needs of future generations, as evidence by our willingness to saddle them with a huge national debt, an overgrown arsenal of destruction, and a deteriorating environment; our unsated assumption, which underlies so much of the propaganda for unlimited abortion, that only those children born for success ought to be allowed to be born at all.

As the Benedictus Trust website explains: «In his book The Idea of a University Bl John Henry Cardinal Newman asserts that the primary purpose of a university should be to teach theoretical knowledge, following the distinction made by Aristotle in the first book of the Nicomachean Ethics between moral and intellectual virtues; the moral life concerned with practical knowledge and the intellectual life primarily concerned with theoretical knowledge — that is, «knowledge for the sake of itself».

Cultural distinctions as a means of celebration is beautiful, but it can be manipulated by those with a thirst for power to control the masses.

R. Bultmann wrote, «according to the oldest view, Christ's resurrection coincides with his exaltation to heavenly glory».23 G. Bornkamm agrees, saying, «What is certainly the oldest view held by the Church made no distinction between the resurrection of Christ and his elevation to the right hand of the Father, while only later was there developed, in addition, the theory of the resurrected Christ walking the earth for a time and only subsequently ascending into heaven.

By means of this distinction, one can argue that, although the primary sense of a term with respect to how it means is the sense it has as applied to a creature, or ordinary individual, the primary sense of the term with respect to what is meant by it is the sense it has as applied to the Creator, or eminent individuaBy means of this distinction, one can argue that, although the primary sense of a term with respect to how it means is the sense it has as applied to a creature, or ordinary individual, the primary sense of the term with respect to what is meant by it is the sense it has as applied to the Creator, or eminent individuaby it is the sense it has as applied to the Creator, or eminent individual.

It is written by a Canadian criminal defense lawyer, now a Crown prosecutor, and it explores the legal and moral dynamics of the Book of Job with particular emphasis on the distinction between causal responsibility and moral blameworthiness embedded in Job's Oath of Innocence.

The Presbyterian study correctly linked sexuality with commitment and responsibility, and it tried to make clear that there is a distinction between teenage passion (felt by people of all ages) and mature commitment.

With great emphasis he reminded all human beings of their brotherly love, their common origin, their equality without distinction except by means of virtue.

Moreover, they have often invoked the distinction between a mere acknowledgment of God's reality intellectually and an actual acquaintance with him existentially, holding that the latter is impossible save where man's natural reason has been enlightened by the grace of God's own self - revelation.

I suggest that a reading of scripture gives us the clues, that John was in fact the last Levitical priest whose task was to inaugurate the» handing over» of the priesthood to the new High Priest, in the new order of Melchizedek (as the writer of the Letter to Hebrews explains it) So Jesus came to John the Levite, John gave Jesus the ritual bath of the High Priest, then Jesus emerged from the bath not to be anointed with oil as the old Levites, but to be anointed with the Holy Spirit and then Jesus» distinction was announced to the people by the voice of God Himself.

It is especially interesting that Luther with his sense of the persistence of sin in the redeemed, and his absolute reliance on justification by faith, still makes a rather neat distinction between those who are truly Christian and those who are not.

He also faulted churches for coalescing around distinctions of class, race, education, and economic status rather than welcoming outcasts — represented in the biblical passage by «foreigners» and «eunuchs» — on equal terms with ourselves as children of God.

But his failure to justify this distinction, by showing how to map a domain of rationality in which the elucidation of metaphysical concepts followed the secure path of a science («in accordance with the example set by geometers and physicists») indicates a general limitation on natural philosophy.

With these three sets of meanings for the terms persuasion, coercion, and freedom it is now possible to make some clarifying distinctions in the discussion of the criticisms made by Hare and Madden.

That path required reform - through - retrieval, the recovery of an element of the tradition of which the Church had lost sight: namely, Pope Gelasius's distinction between, and affirmation of, «two authorities» in the world that should not be thought identical, or even too closely enmeshed with each other (a point underscored by Gregory VII in the Investitute Controversy).

We can get at that sense by following a distinction drawn by Thomas Guarino (the Catholic cochairman of Evangelicals and Catholics Together): «The distinction is between centrality to the foundation of the faith as opposed to the certainty with which the Church teaches it.»

A further distinction, important to make but not self - evident, is the extent to which Israel simply took over prevailing social regulations, and on the other hand, gave unique and distinctive meaning to the duties they believed laid upon them by their covenant with Yahweh.

But we would caution them to remember the important distinction between the strong empathy Christians feel with Israel and the realistic awareness that political decision - making must be shaped by political and not religious guidelines.

Next, a distinction was made between violence and force: The state is invested with force; it is an organism instituted and ordained by God, and remains such even when it is unjust; even its harshest acts are not the same thing as the angry or brutal deed of the individual.