Sentences with phrase «with the homosexuality of»

I Love You, Man, directed with admirable restraint by co-writer John Hamburg (even with the poop jokes and blow - job references), has all that, plus Lou Ferrigno, Rush and the always reliable J.K. Simmons as Rudd's sardonic dad, who is perfectly at ease with the homosexuality of his youngest son (Andy Samberg) and happy to say so in terms that always sound funnier coming out of J.K Simmons» mouth.

Not exact matches

Russia forbids public discussion of homosexuality with a threat of imprisonment.

why would a gay person want to be a part of a faith that is bulging at the seems with members who consider homosexuality to be, not only a sin, but an extremely harmful and vile sin?

This verse clearly refers to the practice of homosexuality, but it seems to be talking about those who then become murderers and so on («Being filled with all unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers,...») and so on.

I have one more question, and it may be a very silly and naive question but I have to ask — why would a gay person want to be a part of a faith that is bulging at the seems with members who consider homosexuality to be, not only a sin, but an extremely harmful and vile sin?

Very few of these have anything to do with homosexuality.

The core assumption of Virtually Normal» and a compelling one, too» is that the absence of public laws granting homosexuals full equality has helped create a culture in which homosexuality is considered dirty or sinful, and in which homosexuals are deemed incapable of loving each other with dignity and commitment.

Largely I would echo what Christine has already said about the way in which we feel accepted within our community, but if you'll bear with me for a little bit, I'd like to attempt to explain to Trey in particular what I see as the difference between this type of acceptance and the attitude of the many Christians who view homosexuality as sinful such as what you have encountered with your sister.

One prominent pastor personally committed to the position of the revisionists stated in a pastoral letter to his congregation that were the revisionists successful, those opposed to the legitimization of homosexuality would be forced to make a painful decision: they could either remain within a church that would stand for an agenda they found incompatible with obedience to Christ, or they could leave the church.

Bob: «I have one more question, and it may be a very silly and naive question but I have to ask — why would a gay person want to be a part of a faith that is bulging at the seems with members who consider homosexuality to be, not only a sin, but an extremely harmful and vile sin?»

In between lie the «conservatives,» who combine private tolerance of homosexuals with public disapproval of homosexuality; and the «liberals,» who speak a language of victimhood and look to the state to enforce private tolerance.

I will no longer debate the issue of homosexuality in the church with anyone.

The institutionalists are concerned less with the rightness or wrongness of homosexuality and related issues than with the future of the denomination.

He describes the pain and embarrassment he experienced in his struggles to come to terms with his homosexuality; his determination, once his desires became undeniable, to remain celibate in accordance with his faith; the explosive mix of joy and confusion he experienced when he had his first homosexual experience at age twenty - three.

People balked at the comparison of gluttony to homosexuality... and I guess my question was why is one so charged with guilt and emotion while the other we don't really care so much about.

And as far as Luke using the American Psychiatric Association he / you might check on how many times they have played around with their definition of homosexuality.

Meanwhile you assail the church and insist on tainting our children with the lie of homosexuality, being taught in our schools upon your insistence.

I like your Traffic Light analogy and find that to be a useful means of describing where one stands on an issue, for example: on the issue of homosexuality being a sin, it has a grey light, with shades of yellow.

Chudacoff, who throughout his book tends to introduce the theme of homosexuality with hints and surmises rather than data, counters Stott's argument with this: «More recently [actually less recently — in 1985 and 1988] other historians have discovered hints [of homosexual relations].»

Far from being an indicator of social acceptance of homosexuality, a movie such as The Birdcage - sanitized of what homosexuals actually do with their plumbing, and of grim specters such as AIDS - is a very traditional instance of people finding homosexual behavior, especially in its more flamboyant cross-dressing variations, ludicrously funny.

Another suggestion is a «theological study in dialogue with the human sciences to develop a multi-faceted look at the phenomenon of homosexuality.»

AIDS is a contagious, fatal disease which has been associated with homosexuality — a highly potent combination of medical and social taboos.

ian... not sure which part you wanted me to reply on, but I will take issue with yr point about homosexuality being a threat to human existence.I'm no expert on the subject, but I think we cd safely assume that the phenomena has been with us since our ancestors came out of the trees... we're now over six billion and growing at an alarming rate.Not sure where you might find the data on this supposed threat to going forth and multiplying.BTW, I have read that homosexual behaviour is observable in the animal kingdom, but I wd need to do some work to reference a credible study.

One effect of the AIDS crisis has been to increase the pressure on the churches to deal in some way with the issue of homosexuality.

The third salient feature of AIDS is its association with homosexuality.

I am NOT saying that people that struggle with homosexuality are destined for hell as the blood of Jesus covers that sin as it does all others.

There is widespread agreement with the view presented in the article on homosexuality in Baker's Dictionary of Christian Ethics (edited by Carl F. Henry [Baker Book House, 1973]-RRB-, which declares that «those who base their faith on the OT and NT documents can not doubt that their strong prohibitions of homosexual behavior make homosexuality a direct transgression of God's law.»

The church, however, can not and need not wait to reach consensus on homosexuality before addressing the staggering spiritual needs of those who are ill with AIDS.

However, in this country, association of the disease with homosexuality is unlikely to disappear soon.

you guys know, don't you, that there are theological discussions with biblical scholars on both sides of the debate on whether the bible condemns homosexuality and homosexual behavior?

I find that most of my Christian friends who talk about homosexuality are either determined to not think about the issue because of tradition and fear or are on the other end and choose not to think about the issue because the pressure of contemporary culture (in our part of the world) is to equate my sexuality with the colour of my skin which is, in light of history, a silly equation but we should just adjust our understanding to accomodate.

As to the reference of homosexuality, the terms «sodomite», «lay with another man» are synonomous with homosexuality.

Much of what I read on depression, on suicide, on homosexuality, seems written by people who begin with a Christian conclusion and who, in fact, have never been through the anguished steps that are the familiar path to a person struggling with depression, suicide or homosexuality.

was printed at the top, with «homophobia» defined as «the condition of hating or fearing homosexuality and gay people.»

He pointed out that the human rights ordinance «had brought the community's conservative churches face to face with the problem of homosexuality for the first time.»

It's a place to hide your homosexuality, your mental illness, your social awkwardness, your deep unresolved feelings of insecurity and inadequacy... all with a literal robe to cover them up.

On the «Day of Silence» in April 2012, about 90 students wearing white T - shirts printed with «break the silence» attended a campus - hosted discussion about homosexuality, such as whether Wheaton can be considered a «safe place» for gay students.

The relevant issue here is not the few places in Scripture where homosexuality is mentioned, and efforts to explain away Romans 1 and its deeply rabbinic connection of homosexuality with idolatry inevitably fail in any case.

Michael Lindsay, president of Gordon College in Massachusetts, said that homosexuality is just one of a basket of issues that evangelical schools are dealing with now for the first time.

OneWheaton, a group unaffiliated with the college, wants to offer an alternative view on homosexuality from that of the evangelical school.

No Imposition of Religion In the contemporary debates on homosexuality, many are tempted to start with an appeal to divine Revelation, whether understood from a Catholic, Anglican or Protestant perspective.

They do this of course to support their belief that homosexuality is an inherently sinful behavior and if an individual is born with such a condition it would seem to imply some sort of endorsement by God.

Less noticed than references to homosexuality in Pope Francis» widely circulated remarks to the press on the Rio - to - Rome papal airplane was this comment on developing a theology of women: The role of women doesn't end just with being a mother and with house work... we....

As an example of something that is genetic and natural but which we would all say is wrong: alcoholism (this isn't an attempt to put homosexuality with alcoholism; it is simply an attempt to create a class of behavior which we would all easily agree is both natural, genetic, and wrong).

But the abandonment of reason, a habitual Lutheran tendency in the face of overwhelming popular opinion through history (one need only think of Nazi Germany and the current collapse of Lutheran will in the face of the abortion and homosexuality conflicts), strikes a deal with the devil.

But it does appear to be true that, as Dias wrote, InterVarsity will maintain doctrinal accountability by asking any staff who disagree with IVCF's conservative stance on homosexuality, same - sex relationships, and gender to inform their leadership, triggering a process of «involuntary termination.»

It is in keeping with both the clear teaching of scripture and Jesus» methods that He would have interacted similarly with a person He knew to be engaged in homosexuality, saying to this dear person, «My son / my daughter, do not continue in this.»

In the case of homosexuality we potentially are talking about randomly occurring variations of a a specific gene that would seem to occur with regularity.

I guess the confusion for me is that «sexual immorality,» as far as the NT audience was concerned, referred back to the sexual sins outlined in the OT law, and it seems like sleeping with one's father's wife would be on par with homosexuality, which is included in the same set of «sexually immoral» sins.

The problem with the sin of homosexuality is that those who practice it claim it as an identity of who they are.