Sentences with phrase «with this observation if»

That means we would deem the multi-model mean inconsistent with this observation if we used red - correction (as is frequently done in climate science.)

That said, it isn't clear what to do with this observation if true.

Not exact matches

For example, if you notice a worker struggling with one set of tasks but exceeding in another, let him or her know your observations, and make an effort to arrange the workload to a balance more favorable to the person's strengths.

Move your observation up a notch to see if and when that person repeats the same behavior with others in your group.

Over the weekend I listened to Russ Roberts» interview with Jason Zweig, who made an excellent observation of how vast the financial markets are and how little time investors spend thinking about this: I think if there's one overriding theme to the book, one of the things I've tried to get across in The Devil's...

A vast increase in oil transport by rail surely has at least something to do with the accident — if the train hadn't been carrying oil, its destruction might have been less catastrophic — but there will inevitably be debate over the conclusion to draw from that observation.

Deep observation must be done in steps: «If you wish to have a sound knowledge of the forms of objects, begin with the details of them, and do not go on to the second step until you have the first well fixed in memory.»

If Endocyte can get this candidate to produce pivotal trial results that fall in line with previous observations, the $ 12 million it paid to license Lu - PSMA - 617 last year could go down as the greatest biopharma investment of the century.

If myelofibrosis trial results are consistent with previous observations, the healthcare behemoth will help fund larger trials in order to support New Drug Applications.

In general, i've always wondered why those «workarounds» are actually tolerated (e.g.phone dialers, etc)-- It seems that if one is not to do something for a given reason, you just don't do it, period... please note, no offense intended with my post, just an observation.

So Huebert, if I understand you correctly you are saying that given a reliable subject with a genuine experience, there is no subjective way to determine that his observation and experience are anything other that what he claims.

The models are not in good agreement with observations — even if they appear to fit the temperature rise over the last 150 years very well.

Here's an observation, too: if these people are debating over what the best objects are to strike children with, they've gone beyond violent discipline into an area of seriously evil pathology.

Firstly, it must be remembered, that he disclaims very early in the book that he can only speak for the mainline denominations with which he is familiar, and although my memory may fail me, he implies that he can only speak for his observations of the churches / leaders with whom he is familiar, and also that he may be wrong, and also, that he is only pointing out what he calls a possible cause for the problems he has seen, and hopes that his suggestions / ideas, will be considered, researched, etc, and that time will tell if his thesis bears any truth or not.

The aim of imaginative generalization is not to purify observation of interpretation, for if such were the case we would be left with little more than the bland experience of the stone: «If we desire a record of uninterpreted experience, we must ask a stone to record its autobiography» (PR 15/22if such were the case we would be left with little more than the bland experience of the stone: «If we desire a record of uninterpreted experience, we must ask a stone to record its autobiography» (PR 15/22If we desire a record of uninterpreted experience, we must ask a stone to record its autobiography» (PR 15/22).

That said, the case has been made that if the Christian god exists, then «God should be detectable by scientific means simply by virtue of the fact that he is supposed to play such a central role in the operation of the universe and the lives of humans», with the conclusion that» [e] xisting scientific models contain no place where God is included as an ingredient in order to describe observations.»

If science ever assumes, it is a temporary thing, until the thing assumed is demonstrated with evidence, or falsified by observations inconsistent with the assumption.

Better to say that even if it does not, such a shift to the right will happen again and again because the one good thing about being in the observation car is that you can see with some clarity where you have been.

But there is one other facet that needs to be synthesised with this if we are to be able to refound Christian culture: the fact (and the Judaeo - Christian revelation) that my very power of intelligent observation is in the image of God's Mind.

If the above formula gives results which are discrepant with observation, it would be quite possible with my general theory of nature to adopt Einstein's formula, based upon his differential equations, for the determination of the gravitational field.

It's a neat way to think about it, and also points to a collective - personality with a memory and an interaction that takes place between individuals, almost a meta - observation on what it means to be human, if you will.

I have tried to distill my observations about the church over the last few years into a few bullet points, both to help myself understand what I have been through and to see if any of these conclusions resonate with anyone else.

What is possible for a given atomic event is heavily conditioned by the entire history of the universe, and by the instruments with which the event is observed if an observation is being made.

«Critical consciousness» seems to entail a conviction that our ideas are in touch with the real world only if they pass the test of being «verifiable» or «falsifiable» according to methods of observation that are publicly accessible.

seems that some people with vision are quite aggressive if this conversation's anything to go by... not sure that's the best of adverts for vision... it also seems that those who don't have vision are passionate, which i would have thought is a good advert for no vision... these are just 2 observations.

OBSERVATION: Let's see now — if Christ was killed with a hangman's rope would christians wear hangman's noose?

I am reminded of Scot McKnight's observation in The Blue Parakeet that «anyone who thinks it is wrong for a woman to teach in church can be consistent with that point of view only if they refuse to read and learn from women scholars.

However, even if science of the day may indicate that all current observations are consistent with a particular theory, we will never know if that theory is a complete and true description of the aspect of nature that the theory is meant to explain.

If there is any conflict in your mind you will find that there is something wrong either with the interpretation or the observation of the facts.

Saint Augustine's maxim, Dilige et quod vis fac — if you but love [God], you may do as you incline — is morally one of the profoundest of observations, yet it is pregnant, for such persons, with passports beyond the bounds of conventional morality.

Hi Deb, Sorry to do this to your already - busting - at - the - seams - cookbook - library, but I highly suggest purchasing (if you don't already own): Sweety Pies: An Uncommon Collection of Womanish Observations, with Pie.

It will be nice if you can come up with how many misplaced passes arsenal makes in a match compare to successful passes to support your observation.

Minus some flashes from both Sead and Iwobi, and a workingman - like effort from Elneny, we learned very little... so here are a few of my observations from today's game, which highlight my concerns about this team moving forward... the fact that Mertz started this game, regardless of our injuries or those being «rested», should be a serious red flag for any true Arsenal fan... if Wenger is preparing to use Mertz with any regularity then the whole thing is a moot point because we are in deep shit... the fact is no quality team would ever have this tin soldier anywhere near there starting eleven except to groom their youthful players, who in turn should be playing in this type of game instead... I can only hope he was simply throwing him a bone for the FA appearance and for agreeing to stay on following the season, but I think the most likely answer is that Wenger's fragile relationship with the fan - base can't be ignored so he felt his experience was a safer bet... unfortunately not a positive choice for a team trying to move forward (same old, same old)

If we always shove them off into noise proof child spaces, they may have the very important opportunity to «just be kids», but they will not have the opportunity to learn through observation how people act in public and may just take their noisiness directly from the playgrounds right into the bars (as they come of age) and then out onto the streets, thereby disrupting my sleep and everyone else's with their shouts and music.

She gets as much out of observation as she does from doing things, so roll up your sleeves, cover your child's hands with your own, and guide them in brushing or gluing or painting if they don't see exactly what to do.

These observations are consistent with current research if we assume the researchers were observing babies with a fairly typical nursing pattern, where baby has a longer sleep period at night and gradually decreases the amount of time between nursing as the day progresses.

If you are concerned that your daughter may exhibit these quieter symptoms of ADHD, talk with your doctor about your observations.

Among other things she advocates crying, a 3 hourly feeding schedule if you BF or 4 hourly if you FF, overwrap babies with excessive bedding (which is what The Analytical Armadillo has been questioning recently), has some very misinformed views and ideas which are all based on her observations and opinions, rather than any that can be substantiated by scientific evidence and had some weird notions that babies can poo and vomit on cue to manipulate their parents.

The latest ear infection treatment guidelines from the American Academy of Pediatrics does offer an «observation option» for older children so that they can be observed without antibiotics for up to 48 hours to see if they get better on their own, but they state that children under six months of age should always be treated with antibiotics when they have an ear infection.

The observations could make some evolutionary sense if we accept the idea that men with lower testosterone levels are more likely to be monogamous with their partner and care for children.

In pure EC you might still use a diaper back - up, in hybrid EC / PT you would ditch diapers after the 1 - 2 days of naked observation and teaching time IF you feel like it, yet with the PT book plan, it is cold turkey (and WAY better for the child IF you're still having that resistance stuff and standing and whatnot when the time comes).

If you are not yet comfortable with your baby's nurses, you might begin by making observations and asking questions: «My baby looks uncomfortable.

If you think that one of your students might have selective mutism, you should share your observations with his parents.

With these observations in mind, Chuck Todd described what he sees as a need for professional news organizations like his to move out of the «breaking news» business and more into the «breaking analysis» business — with online newswires putting out headlines by the minute, what does it matter if, say, NBC gets a story five minutes before With these observations in mind, Chuck Todd described what he sees as a need for professional news organizations like his to move out of the «breaking news» business and more into the «breaking analysis» business — with online newswires putting out headlines by the minute, what does it matter if, say, NBC gets a story five minutes before with online newswires putting out headlines by the minute, what does it matter if, say, NBC gets a story five minutes before CNN?

Communism, philosophically, is what comes after Capitalism if one is going along with Marxs thesis on the law of motion for economies; he gave no time - table, nor no indication of what this future form of the economy would be like - it could be sometime in the middle of this century, or it could be a millenia away; in his thesis, it is almost tautologically true; until then Marx expected Capitalism to succeed as a global force - this was an earlier observation of Hegel that foresaw that «trade» would become «world - historical» in its European form.

And the IFS added in its observations on Lib Dem policies on Monday, «it is less clear that the proposal to increase the income tax personal allowance to # 10,000 will help many of the poorest households, as the poorest fifth of households will contain those with incomes too low to pay income tax.

«And what Cuomo did if Foye shared that same memo and those same observations with him.

Current multiverse models agree with observations only if certain parameters are given specific values — if the forces holding matter together were slightly stronger or weaker, for instance, it would be impossible for us to be here to observe the universe.

But Randall and her collaborators realized they could tidily explain the observation if there were a second type of dark matter out there: one that is not as diffuse as the dominant component of dark matter, but can interact with itself, just like visible matter.

I always suspected that Neandertals and anatomically modern humans interbred, based on a simple observation: humans are the most sexual of all the primates, willing and able to do it just about anywhere, anytime, with anyone (and even with other species if the Kinsey report is to be believed in its findings about farmhands and their animal charges).