Sentences with phrase «with time evolution»

Therefore, it is absolutely inappropriate to use the IPCC's equation to describe anything to do with time evolution of the climate system.

Not exact matches

Hunt says her own evolution has been «a combination of being enamored and obsessed with the social web and being in the right place at the right time.»

«It's organized crime so you're dealing with evolution, most of the time, rather than revolution,» says Somerville.

Evolution does not affect overall entropy in a manner inconsistent with the laws of physics on a properly defined scale in space and time — especially when you consider things like failed mutations, decomposition of organisms, etc..

To me the world has been predetermined ever since the beginning of time with programs such as evolution and expansion set up just right, as a perfectly aligned series of dominoes, so that humans could come to exist.

I agree with you, I have yet to see any of them post their claimed 5 laws of evolution as you asked for multiple times, nor have I heard of anything evolution said to back up it's claims to having done anything at all.

If we compare it with biological evolution on different Geological Time Scale first developed life was also in the form of fish which originated during Cambrian period.

He and Gingrich don't disagree on evolution and manmade global warming probably happening, but the ex-governor does have a firmer grasp on what's required to deal with the economic crisis of our time.

Seeing a man's foot print in a stone creek bed complete with a primitive shoe sole right next to a dinosaur foot print makes the time line of evolution very suspect.

Most textbooks will show a live tree of evolution with the groups evolving through a long period of time.

So, Adam or Eve, the next time you kneel down in your church and take your weekly dose of the body and blood of your dead Greco - Roman Jewish hippie - God, you might like to reflect on the fact that you are actually eating proof of evolution and washing it down with proof of evolution.

to Jake, in every era or times in the past, humans have different perception of reality, because our knowledge improves or changes toward sophistication, For example during the times of Jesus, there was no science yet as what we have today, since the religion in the past corresponds to their needs, it is true for them in the past, but today we already knew many new ideas and facts, so what is applicable in the past is no longer today, like religion, we have also to change to conform with todays knowledge.The creation or our origin for example is now explained beyond doubt by science as the big bang and evolution is the reason we become humans, is in contrast to creation in the bibles genesis,.

It would be like having your science teacher explain in detail what we have discovered in regards to evolution and been able to test and repeat but then ends with «Even though this is what we have observed time and again and has been peer reviewed and see no reason it should work in any other way, we just don't know how science worked 10,000 years ago.

TheCapitalist As I stated a few pages back, creationists lie all the time about evolution, and I don't think they could have been so thorough with their misrepresentation of evolution unless they had the correct understanding of the theory from which to work with.

For union with God as Ground of evolution means involvement in evolutionary time; advance into the future toward God - Omega is not a withdrawal from time but a fuller possession of it.

actually you do nt have to prove the many deities or Gods that they really exist, because they really had existed in their times, They are part of the evolutionary process for us humans to transcend to higher consciousness.To simplify the analogy, when we were young and we are in the lower grade school, we were taught simple subjects not advance literatures but simple stories even mythicals, The same with religion, thousands of years ago when there was no science yet, primitive people had a religion, of course man made faiths to conform with their state of mind or intellect.But later atfter thousands of years we evolve into a more educated people and so new concept of God again was presented to them, another man made concept, and this go on and on, until a few thiousand years ago.monotheism, Judaism, christianity, islam, buddhism, etc also evolved, But with the accelerated evolution, these faith again is threatend with obsolesencs because of of scientific developments and education.In panthroteistic faith, the future religion needs to conform to evolutionary process, This proves that God is always there guiding the change.And it his will that made this a reality in history since the begining of the universe 13 billion years ago, and this will continue to exist until He will completely fulfill His will to infinity, Thats PANTHROTHEISM, the futue, man made religion under His guidance through scientifiic evoluition after the Bi Bang

The main problem I've seen with people accepting evolution (aside from plain old religious grounds) is a lack of concept of the vast amounts of time over which these things happened.

Let me proceed to argue the point, first by a theoretical analysis of the nature of evolutionary time, contrasting it with the hellenic view of time, and second by a confirmation and verification of this analysis of evolutionary time as non-contingent and immanent by observing the actual process of evolution itself.

When one finds Fred Hoyle announcing his conviction that evolution can not have taken place on this planet from scratch in the time available, but must instead have been brought in from outer space, the Bible believer obviously is under no pressure to get into line with the evolutionists whose house itself appears to be in considerable disrepair.

morsedan People who use the term micro and macro to describe evolution do not understand that they are the same thing, with only differing amounts of time, and since neither one is actually defined, they are not terms used by the scientific community.

So, Capitalist, the next time you kneel down in your church and take your weekly dose of the body and blood of your dead Jew, you might like to reflect on the fact that you are actually eating proof of evolution and washing it down with proof of evolution.

Tate's thorough acquaintance with regional and national literature of the 19th and 20th centuries gave him an excellent vantage point for observing the evolution of southern literature over a considerable length of time.

They want equal time for Creationism with Evolution.

Not to metion we still have the «missing link» issue where at one point (based on evolution) the human brain advanced very quickly with very little time for evolution to take place.

At the time, the majority of the science faculty espoused young earth creationism, so I learned about evolution in the context of Christian apologetics courses, with the presupposition that evolution was incompatible with the Christian faith.

>> > and by the way, I have a hard time with your idea that the creation story fits well with evolution, there are a number of things in error even if you take the story figuratively»

Schönborn Continued If the evidence of Reuters» 20th - November interview with Cardinal Schönborn is anything to go by, the media still continue to show great interest in the Church's understanding of evolution expressed by the Cardinal in July in the New York Times.

The programs taught me about (1) admitting I was beat, (2) coming to believe in something greater than myself (eventually a higher power)(many evolutions and concepts of HP, all of these at one time or another: nature, the 12 steps, creator, Love, spiritual principles)(Step 3) applying my low self worth and gigantic Ego to these spiritual principles (4) write down my liabilities and assets (5) share them with another and my higher power (6 & 7) ask for the liabilites to be removed and be patient with the process (8) Make a list of all that were harmed by me (9) make amends to such folks except whn to do so would injure them or myself (10) take a daily inventory of my day, checking for snafus, mean temperment, arrogance etc (11) meditation and prayer to communicate to my higher power and quiet reflection to listen for the Truth (12) after having a spiritual awakening as a result of working these steps, help others if they wish for help because now I am in the position to assist.

Can evolution be seen with time lapse photography?

I do nt believe a persons view on creationism or evolution is a «salvation issue» but once you have become a child of God I do nt see how you cant allow yourself to believe in the entire Bible and trust that God is BIG enough to do what He says and did create the world in 7 days with no help from «time and evolution» evolution is a trick from Satan to keep you from completly trusting God for everything.

John A Except that, by that time, most Christians will be completely OK with evolution, same se x marriage, and maybe even abortion; and they'll be able to cite verses to support their position just like the Christians who oppose these things can today.

Has nothing to do with actual fossils that demonstrate an evolution of a single species over time; whether dogs, cats, monkeys, birds, or humans.

Still waiting for some tangible bit of argument with the majors, many of which were postulated by Sagan and Hawkings, such as Mankind's short time here on this planet in the historic context of the worlds evolution.

If we do, the awareness aroused in us of being each a responsible element in a rebounding course of Evolution must, at the same time as it gives rise to a desire and reason for action, inspire us with a fundamental sense of obligation and a precise system of moral tendencies.

Bergson is cited several times in a sympathetic but nonessential fashion, in connection with such concepts as «intuition, «canalization,» and «spatialization,» all of which refer to the characteristics of thought and experience, rather than to evolution or to Bergson's wider evolutionary cosmology.

3At present, for example, the well - entrenched neo-Darwinian hypothesis of «gradualism» (biological evolution occurs slowly, and more or less continuously as the constant interplay of random variations and natural selection over vast periods of time) is confronted with a somewhat more radical and neo-Lamarckian theory of «punctuated equilibrium» favored by Harvard biologists Stephen Jay Gould and Peter Williamson, collaborated by fossil discoveries of paleontologist and cultural anthropologist Richard Leakey in Africa.

In fact, when I've actually taken the time to study the issues that trigger my doubts — issues like religious pluralism, the Problem of Evil, biblical interpretation, evolution, predestination and free will — I come out with a stronger, more resilient faith.

Obviously, for me to exist as I am requires a material universe with certain physical laws with enough time and the right conditions for life to begin and evolution to occur, but unless God is defined as the mindless action - reaction of physical laws, then I don't see the necessity for a God.

Scientific, philosophical, and religious thoughts, are all flawed with our limited human perceptions based on our own human experiences and the evolution of those thoughts over time.

In fact there is a way in which we can show how man can be one with the process of evolution and its crowning glory, and at the same time a «special creation», without juggling with words and meanings.

Applying this insight, we can see how to use the time - honored expression «natural selection» in a more adequate way: evolution toward «adaptation» with the environment involves the survival of societies whose occasions aim to incorporate in a richer experience influences which might otherwise be destructive of the society's defining characteristics.

As we have argued before in this magazine, metaphysically speaking, contrary to fashionable reductionism, all thingsare irreducibly (and wonderful) complex, or «holistic», and that certainly does not stop them being causally related across time with other things (e.g. by evolution).

So, Adam or Eve, the next time you kneel down in your church and take your weekly dose of the body and blood of your dead Jew, you might like to reflect on the fact that you are actually eating proof of evolution and washing it down with proof of evolution.

This comes out clearly in both Time and Free Will and Creative Evolution where he says that to be a determinist is to hold, with Spinoza, that the future is logically contained in the present.

So, my fundamentalist friends, the next time you kneel down in your church and take your weekly dose of the body and blood of your dead Jew, you might like to reflect on the fact that you are actually eating proof of evolution and washing it down with proof of evolution.

However, I accept evolution, don't think the Bible is strictly «inerrant» (I'm in the «inspired but not literally word - for - word accurate» camp), and am not even remotely on board with the standard Adventist end - of - time beliefs.

The human species, the only one with a spiritual soul, is, as fulfilled by the Incarnation, the purpose of creation in our theology, The breakdown of the individual physical thing is part of the dynamic of evolution across time as it aims at its goal.

The first time I entertained the notion that the theory of evolution might be compatible with my faith happened when I was studying the history of the church.

Scholarly acceptance of physical evolution suggested that culture, too, must have evolved, must have risen through stages on the way to modern times, each stage with its own religious orientation and style of life.

why don't you start with why humans invented religion in the first place, the origins of the books of the bible, the multiple «christ» (copied) stories throughout the history of time, fossil evidence of evolution of man and all species, all the discrepancies in the bible, knowledge of all the gods that humans have believed in through recorded history, the political uses of christianity in the time of it's origin, the fact that every other religion has followers who believe just as strongly in their own god / book, that fact that if you had been born in another part of the world you would be a different religion and going to «hell», and that a good, kind, omniscient god wouldn't allow all the suffering and evil to happen, and wouldn't need «help» as christians like to tout... and then we'll get to all these ridiculous fools.