Sentences with phrase «with valid arguments»

While I do like using physical home buttons, readers chimed in with some valid arguments against them.

Explain the importance of networking science in communication purpose across the globe by supporting with valid arguments.

Not exact matches

People with valid or supposed valid arguments on both sides of the issue.

Here is a post from Libertarian News that begins, «I recently got into an argument over on the Reddit Bitcoin boards where I held the position that fractional reserve banking with Bitcoins was not possible,» which sounds fun; he recants that view but does make what I think is a very valid point:

The last childlike argument from someone with no valid position or evidencial support.

Even if Theo or Vic constructed an argument with a valid conclusion stemming from its premises and free of fallacies, it is still only logic.

To go along with this, you have to believe three things, all controversial: (1) that authenticity is a valid idea; (2) that you can argue in reason about ideals and about the conformity of practices to these ideals; and (3) that these arguments can make a difference.

Thus Martin concludes, for example, that N. T. Wright's approach to Jesus, which mixes supernaturalism and ordinary biography, is just as historically valid as Sanders's method, which does not deal with miracles or the resurrection — although, paradoxically Martin finds Wright's arguments about the resurrection very unconvincing.

And even if there are valid arguments in support of churches with a predominant ethnic group, still the wider Christian community often falters when it comes to demonstrating unity in Christ.

You keep repeating arguments I'm not disagreeing with, not even yuor final bit that God is a valid hypothesis.

Valid a priori arguments, indeed, may be held only to «impoverish» experience in the sense that they show the intrinsic unsatisfactoriness of certain ways of understanding reality and bring to light the structures involved in any understanding of it which presupposes and is consistent with the principle of rationality.

If I'm presented with an argument that is valid and makes sense then I will change my mind.

He shows that this is similar to Chesterton's approach and W.V.O. Quine's argument that «the only valid test of a belief is whether it fits into a web of connected beliefs that accords with our experience of the whole» (p. 63 - I would think that Newman's concept of the «Illative Sense» would dovetail with this.)

By the way, that was me pretending to be you Red Dwarf because I have no valid argument and can only act like a 3rd grade child when faced with actual logic and reason.

Even if you want to lay to one side the very valid concerns about the porn industry's links with human trafficking, or the connections between hard - core pornography use and sexual violence, there's a strong argument that this is, in fact, a public health issue.

There are valid arguments for and against running Silver Spoon (who, unlike Regret, would have to carry 121 pounds against the colts» 126 pounds) in the Derby, and Whitney intends to weigh all of them with the meticulous care of a Cape Canaveral supervisor before he orders the button pushed.

Your argument is valid and certainly one I agree with for the long term, I just don't like seeing Denver spend money on a guy for insurance purposes.

LVG has had 18 months, and whilst anyone can argue we have improved, another valid argument would be that pretty much any manager in the Premier League working with this squad would have United where they are or higher, and playing better football.

Yes, I think the critique which you make of some the politics / media presentation of Denham's argument chimes with points Don Paskino has also made, and I think some of this is a valid critique if we want to avoid these trenchlines into which the debate risks going.

But any actions would only be seen as legally valid if there was an argument to fall back on that they were being enacted on at least someone's advice, and with some elected minister's consent.

The burqa may be perceived as promoted due to a view of women very much at odds with the liberal view my the «modern left», which could be a valid progressive argument to prohibit it.

Arguments that some kids aren't «college material» and damning them with low expectations are no longer valid or acceptable.

Truthfully, I've heard many arguments that support charter public schools and many that support district schools — all with valid points and facts to back them up.

(I guess your choice argument is valid here since charter parents must be okay with a test prep education while my students» parents would consider such pursuits to be distasteful.)

Try entering a debate with reasoned valid arguments, rather than telling everyone they're wrong and you're right.

For all those responding with personal insults to a perfectly valid argument.

I don't think «legacy» authors ever had a valid argument with their «protecting against crap» spiel.

Make sure that are substantiating your conclusion solutions with proper reasons and valid arguments.

I think that's a valid argument, though whether it will have traction with investors is up for debate.

While there are valid arguments at this time as to whether one should rent or own their primary residence given the absurd amount of debt most are carrying on their principal residence along with artificially cheap money and the boomer influx about to hit the real estate markets across Canada over the next few years it would seem you are okay in that area.

btw i agree with you on your valid argument about the errors in «the Order 1886».

One of the most common arguments brought up in regards to the «failure» of the Vita is that Sony have not supported it with enough marketing, and that's as valid a point as any.

U guy giving valid arguments about other ps devices but that has nothing to do with his statement.

I know the 3rd party argument is valid, but with the incredible amount of amassed fortune coupled with the dominating success of the 3ds, I have no reason to believe Nintendo is in dire need of 3rd party support for the wii U. Minus a few companies (Bethesda) I would go as far as to say that its not worth even having 3rd party games around anymore.

(If scientists with such a range of views agree that this work is valid, that seems to cut against arguments over the reliability and utility of temperature records gathered by weather stations — or am I missing something?)

Just because an argument is predicated on an appeal to authority in conjunction with a «larger» argument» does not make the argument valid.

They challenge this on rather solid empirical grounds and with physical arguments and data analysis that is every bit as scientifically valid as that used to support larger estimates, often obtaining numbers that are in better agreement with observation.

[However valid your argument may be, starting with potentially libelous statements is guaranteed to get you moderated]- Fly

I realize it's kind of late for making suggestions, but here goes anyway: Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect.It looks like you have addressed T&G's main arguments (eg, about the 2nd law), but I wonder if it might be appropriate to put in a brief description of what it means to «falsify» something in the scientific sense — ie, essentially what T&G must show (and failed to show) to make their case that there is no greenhouse effect: namely, 1) experimental evidence that shows the opposite of what an atmospheric greenhouse effect would necessarily produce and / or 2) evidence that the greenhouse effect would actually violate some physical law (eg, 2nd law of thermo) The pot on the stove example is obviously an attempt to show that you get a colder temp with the water than without, but I think it's worthwhile explicitly stating that «because T&G failed to demonstrate that the pot on the stove example is a valid analogy for the earth, they failed to falsify the atmospheric greenhouse effect» And you could also add a sentence stating that «because T&G failed to show that the greenhouse effect would require a violation of the 2nd law [because their arguments were incorrect], they also failed to falsify»

No one has replied with any valid counter arguments that I can't refute.

Thereby making Climate Change into something of a farce, by simply taking whatever conflicts with desire, asserting the opposite, then finding some argument to further the necessary belief that said assertion is valid.

Do you wish a detailed discussion of the UHI affect, of the disappearing stations, the march of stations to airports, the ever more extensive (up to 40 percent recently for some months) of ignoring valid stations and infilling with other stations through hominization that is disputed in both rational arguments and peer reviewed publications?

If you are able to properly confute a proposed theory, you have plenty of resourses to do it in the proper way in the open scientific debate with valid and objective arguments by writing a proper comment / rebuttal.

My take on the uncertainty issue is that the difference in +1 C (mild) +3 C (climate model) and +10 C (outlier) scenarios are really just different people's intuition, all with valid scientific arguments that rationalize them.

When current pH estimates are compared with much more coarse paleo estimates to «prove» a point, it is a valid argument.

If the system is capable of exhibiting sufficient capacitance to produce the recent hiatus, there is no valid argument against why it could not also have produced the entire modern warming, unless that can be disproven with empirical data or I / O test results.

Your argument based on lapse rate is only valid to the top of the middle atmosphere and falls apart in the upper atmosphere where temperature increases with altitude.

The natural cynacism that I have towards the «establishment» is a result of my experience in other cases — where, I now judge, I was being «sold to» rather than being presented with all of the facts — including valid arguments for the opposing view which may, at the very least, have suggested less certainty.

But approaching the question of discernable temperature anomalies and trends and correlations with human behaviour with curve fitting... and then to bog down in arguments about whether it is statistically valid to do so... does take the eye off physics arguments and is just sooo missing the point.

I think the core of your argument as I see it (the need for scientists to be less defensive, less circling of the wagons, more introspection, more communication and collaboration with «outsiders», taking criticism seriously, etc) is important and valid.