Rain — while essentially a platformer - lite — played some really nice tricks
with water physics and rain - based puzzles, and it was made by Japan Studio.
Not exact matches
To ask such a question is to plunge us into the murky
waters not of
physics but of metaphysics — and no one has bothered much
with that topic for years.
Most geologists and scientists say there is however a fairly large amount of data that proves a major regional floods have occured that would imitate some of the Genesis flood account details, however
with the book claiming it was a global flood being specific as to how far over every mountain the
water reached,
physics easily debunks the Genesis account.
Physics is sufficiently advanced today to define many substances very perfectly, in their very essence, in terms of those causes which constitute them, and in this we see that the active relationship by which, let us say, oxygen and hydrogen are defined as causes of
water in a given relativity, is an active potency in those causes of dynamic finality
with respect to the composite substance which is
water.
Check out how we used PVC pipes to have fun
with water beads and basic
physics for toddlers!
With these recycled crafts, kids can create a terranium or an aquarium to learn about their favorite animals, or they can get a little
physics lesson as they create their own
water - powered rocket.
Their findings shed new light on the
physics of black holes
with the first laboratory evidence of the phenomenon known as the superradiance, achieved using
water and a generator to create waves.
I was a North Carolina newspaper reporter
with an undergraduate degree in
physics, writing about waste
water treatment plants, school board meetings, and church socials, when the
physics department at the University of North Carolina offered me a pay raise to go back to school.
Bandi, a professor of
physics at the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), wets the tip of a chopstick
with liquid soap, amusement written on his face, and asks his dinner guests their predictions: what will the flakes do when the soap meets the
water's surface?
Now, physicists report June 12 in Nature
Physics that they've glimpsed the effect for the first time, in a black hole doppelgänger made
with a vortex of
water, similar to
water swirling down a bathtub drain.
Mikhailov, E., Vlasenko, S., Martin, S.T., Koop, T., and Pöschl, U.: Amorphous and crystalline aerosol particles interacting
with water vapour: conceptual framework and experimental evidence for restructuring, phase transitions and kinetic limitations, Atmospheric Chemistry and
Physics, 9, 9491 - 9522, 2009.
They started
with the experimental set up traditionally used for second harmonic generation studies in Geiger's group, which included a femtosecond laser oscillator from Newport Spectra
Physics, optical lenses and mirrors, and a flow cell produced in - house for housing the alpha - quartz /
water interface.
«The jets must be supersonic,
with Mach numbers of two or greater, but because of cooling of the
water vapor in the eruption throat, the actual velocity may not be as high as we thought previously,» said Larry Esposito, a conference organizer and a professor of astrophysical and planetary sciences in the Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space
Physics (LASP) at the University of Colorado, Boulder.
«Our findings are consistent
with the presence of hydrated salts, because you can have hydrated salt without having enough for the
water to start filling pore spaces between particles,» said Christopher Edwards, a faculty member in the Department of
Physics and Astronomy at Northern Arizona University and one of the study's authors.
As its inventor, you have to stop the out of control
water with machinery and a new liquid
physics engine.
It typically lasts four days and consists of about two days of classroom - style learning, covering all aspects of the
physics of diving and equipment, plus two days of hands - on learning, becoming acquainted
with the scuba gear in the
water and doing simple dives.
and the
water and ocean is something i have yet to see even in nexgen games... not to mention vegetation
physics and face rendering... so please stop discussing over stuff u have no idea of untill u see it
with ur own eyes... and just for ur info i have a core2duo and a 9600gt..
yeah killzone 2 does not use Resistance 2's
water at all... in fact I've never seen
water that looks like that of killzone 2 yet... it has multiple layers
with multiple real - time reflections... but, at least for the big moving
water body in the demo... there are no
physics like uncharted or R2 incorporated... if you shoot it, there is a huge plume of
water that jets upward, but no real ripples in the body... it still looks great, at the ripples wouldn't look right
with the waves and the current of the
water... but its definitely not an R2
water engine or anything... however killzone 2 does have the ripples in other areas... puddles will react to bullet fire apparently... and there are areas of flooded buildings
with «still»
water... that do have the uncharted like ripples according to some... but the big flowing river does not...
With Frostbite 3,
water physics have also been taken a step further and sea - faring consists of real - time waves and a choppy sea experience when the weather worsens.
The
physics engine is excellent — walking through
water slows you down, hacking a tree
with an axe will inevitably chop it down and so on.
Wave Race as a series has been dormant since Wave Race: Blue Storm on the GameCube, and
with how spectacular the game's
water physics were back then I can only imagine how they'll behave and look on the Switch.
It's not the exact same game as it has had a huge overhaul,
with new graphics and an advanced
physics engine, allowing for more authentic
water and mud, giving a more realistic feeling overall.
Hydro Thunder Hurricane is a speedboat racing game
with gorgeous levels, over the top courses, and advanced
water physics.
Next Gen
Water Racing - Vector Unit's first game since Hydro Thunder Hurricane to be designed from the ground up for modern consoles, RGP: R sets the bar for dynamic water racing, with breathtaking dynamic water physics, splash - tastic spray effects, and
Water Racing - Vector Unit's first game since Hydro Thunder Hurricane to be designed from the ground up for modern consoles, RGP: R sets the bar for dynamic
water racing, with breathtaking dynamic water physics, splash - tastic spray effects, and
water racing,
with breathtaking dynamic
water physics, splash - tastic spray effects, and
water physics, splash - tastic spray effects, and more!
It was quite revolutionary in it's approach to many things, from continuous side - scrolling, to reliable in - game
physics, to the novelty of different power - ups, separate worlds
with different dangers, the variety of having ground and sky and even underwater swimming levels (in which you had to master swimming
physics, learning how to navigate both gravity and hazards in the
water stages).
Transforming Fashion closed last Sunday
with CORE's movement homage to van Herpen, who reimagines crows, feathers,
water, copper, tesla coils, umbrellas, fractals, even the laws of
physics into masterful, wearable 3 - D printed garments.
A computer calculates the movement of the particles to produce a simulation of
water that flows in accordance
with the laws of
physics.
There's also a number of interesting applications in the evolution of Earth's atmosphere that branch off from the runaway greenhouse
physics, for example how fast a magma - ocean covered early Earth ends up cooling — you can't lose heat to space of more than about 310 W / m2 or so for an Earth - sized planet
with an efficient
water vapor feedback, so it takes much longer for an atmosphere - cloaked Earth to cool off from impact events than a body just radiating at sigmaT ^ 4.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas and
physics tells us that the minimum sensitivity to a doubling of CO2
with water vapor feedback is 2 degrees celsius.
A
physics teacher I know wondered the same thing, and spoke of how a glass of
water with ice cubes stays fairly cool until the last cube completely melts, then the
water warms fairly quickly to room temp.
I had a particularly fascinating time interviewing Richard Wilson, a professor emeritus of
physics at Harvard who has lately been studying risks associated
with everything from nuclear power to Bangladesh's arsenic - tainted
water supply.
Simple
physics dictates that
with less sea ice there is magnified warming of the Arctic due to powerful albedo feedback; this in turn reduces the equator to pole temperature gradient which slows the jet stream winds causing them to become more meridional; this combined
with 4 % more
water vapor in the atmosphere (compared to 3 decades ago) is leading to much more extremes in weather.
It doesn't bother
with «
water has a feedback effect on anything that increases ore reduces air temperatures» because that isn't needed: it's an inherent property of the
physics you've included in your model.
While the amounts and distribution of
water vapor and clouds are feedbacks, the intrinsic properties are «externally - imposed» by the
physics, as is the case
with snow and ice, etc..
Water will freeze and thaw at random temperatures, gravity will cease to be a force to be reckoned
with — and the world will finally be free from those «laws of
physics»...
In recent years, the Fraunhofer Institute for Building
Physics IBP in Stuttgart has carried out a large number of experimental tests to investigate the drying behavior of wall, floor and ceiling structures
with artificially induced
water damage.
If one tried to actually write «the» partial differential equation for the global climate system, it would be a set of coupled Navier - Stokes equations
with unbelievably nasty nonlinear coupling terms — if one can actually include the
physics of the
water and carbon cycles in the N - S equations at all.
This NASA website substitutes his theory
with a claim of more «reflection» from higher surface area of
water droplets: http://geo.arc.nasa.gov/sgg/singh/winners4.html: it's incorrect
physics.
This remains to be seen, of course, but it's important to point out that the trospospheric amplification prediction does not originate in the models but in the basic
physics of radiative transfer in combination
with the Clausius - Clapeyron relationship describing the change in atmospheric
water vapor as a function of temperature.
«The
physics» includes the demonstrated relationship between temperature and
water vapor pressure: vapor pressure increases supralinearly
with temperature, meaning that a 1C increase from 15C to 16C causes a larger increase in vapor pressure than a 1C increase from 5C to 6C.
p.s. And to make it clear, the reason I'm not at all surprised that this has been missed out and that you know nuttin about it, is because for several decades universities have been teaching from the AGWSF energy budget, which is missing the WHOLE
Water Cycle, and none of you super educated in
physics with years of teaching and phd's have even noticed it's missing!
You can even read up on the
physics of
water as a greenhouse gas that also isn't difficult to show
with simple science,
Oooooops, so tell me again, how many GCMs have
physics which match
with the observed reduction in relative humidity
with rise temperature and the consequent negative
water vapour feedback?
I have no clue if this group has figured all that out, but there are some serious flaws
with the application of radiant
physics on a chaotic
water world.
There are other methods for using several data series when the
physics of a system is too complex; they avoid dealing
with «models embodying the laws of
physics...
with parametrization of the
water vapor cycle» and provide convenient checks.
So, that's 1.2 degrees C for the basic
physics of added greenhouse effect of a doubling of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere; coupled
with a further increase of a similar magnitude from changes in atmospheric
water vapour that come about as a direct consequence.
47 Hydroelectric Example:
Physics for the IB Diploma 5th Edition (Tsokos) 2008 Hydroelectric Example: Find the power developed when
water in a stream
with a flow rate of 50 L / s falls from a height of 15m.
If we take a further step and consider the atmospheric state at a location (or even the global average)
with respect to temperature or precipitation, we may observe that
physics does not imply any preservation law for temperature (the total energy is preserved, not temperature) or for precipitation (the total
water balance is preserved, not the rate of precipitation).
Exactly why CAPE increases as the climate warms is still an area of active research, Romps said, though it is clear that it has to do
with the fundamental
physics of
water.
Also, regarding subsea volacanic eruptions — a volcanic eruption involves release of magma at several thousand degrees C plus superheated gases — when that hits cold sea
water you are going to have a very violent and explosive change of form from lquid
water to steam combined
with the release of dissolved gases (mostly CO2)-- I am not sure what laws of Chemistry and
Physics you are looking at, but I would suggest that that those bubbles and heated gases and
water will rise to to the surface very quickly and have a major local effect on any nearby ice.