Sentences with phrase «with written evidence»

I have confirmed with the CA Dept. of Corporation this is illegal, I have provided them with written evidence and they do nothing about it.

However, if the existing tenants provided you with written evidence that they did not want to renew their lease, why would you be obligated to pay the $ 4,500 relo fee?

In such instances, the parent will typically need to provide the court with written evidence verifying her compliance before the judge will permit the first visit.

Resume is a way of providing the employer with the written evidence of your possessed skills and knowledge.

Apart from this duly filled Claim Form with written evidence of loss must be furnished within thirty (30) days after the date of such loss.

The Panel's review is a quasi-judicial process, with written evidence and expert reports, oral testimony, cross-examinations, information requests and legal argument.

Placide at first denied representing outside clients, then admitted it when confronted with written evidence, the court said.

It is available online, along with written evidence submitted by scores of other individuals and organizations, at the Select Committee's website at http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/energy-and-climate-change-committee/inquiries/parliament-2010/the-ipcc/.

The Commons Committee's findings are difficult to reconcile with the written evidence it received.

I do not think I am right because the majority claim I know I am right because of personal experience that matched up exactly with the written evidence we have in the Bible.

Not exact matches

Further evidence comes from the interesting fact that the parchment version of the Declaration of Independence that is on display and kept in the United States National Archives wasn't actually written until July 19th; this being a copy of the approved text that was announced to the world on July 4th, with about 150 - 200 copies being made on paper and distributed on that date (26 of which are still around today, thus pre-dating what is now generally thought of as the «original»).

That's based on technical analysis (an investing strategy with both its pros and cons) from Fundstrat technical strategist Robert Sluymer, who wrote in that same note: «Our expectation is Bitcoin will begin to show evidence of bottoming short - term closer to $ 5,873.»

«There is evidence that we have been pursuing less complex systems with about the same or less risk since 2009,» Kendall writes.

Instead, Gunter writes, women should use evidence - backed Kegel exercises, either with a less expensive vaginal weight, a tampon, a finger, or nothing at all — equipment is not required.

But, as we've written before, there is no evidence that donations to the Clinton Foundation from people with ties to Uranium One or Bill Clinton's speaking fee influenced Hillary Clinton's official actions.

The DCMS committee wrote to Zuckerberg on March 20 — following newspaper reports based on interviews with a former employee of UK political consultancy, Cambridge Analytica, who revealed the company obtained Facebook data on 50 million users — calling for him to give oral evidence.

«There was no evidence presented at the hearing that Mr. Zachary Cruz had threatened anyone during this arrest, that he resisted in anyway, or that he was uncooperative with police,» he wrote.

Senior fellow Monica de Bolle and research fellow Martin Chorzempa write that the Venezuelan government's proposal «combines serious misunderstandings with wishful thinking about the benefits of blockchain technology, along with evidence that the government is either trying to fool its populace or that it does not understand the basics of cryptocurrencies, or both.»

So how do you go from that reasoning to «Since it wasn't accidental then it must have been this ancient male diety named (fill in blank depending on religion) who loves me and knows me and cares for me and wants me to perform rituals that have nothing to do with morality like prayer, not eating certain things, sabaath and many more just because he said so, even though we have no record of him saying anything, just records of humans who wrote things down that they claim he said, but I want to believe it all so badly I will base my beliefs on no other evidence than «it just can't be accident».

You hit the nail squarely on the head for indeed so, biblical truths are «written on our heart» by way of the Presence of Christ's Indwelt Spirit Who is ever faithful to «guide you into all truth» and «show (us) things to come» (John 16:13) but the problem is (as is woefully evident with this Article \ s Author), too many people (believers) choose to eschew or disregard «sound doctrine» (2 Timothy 4:3) promulgating John 14:17 ignorance of the Doctrine of The Holy Spirit whose inevitable product is a darkened understanding (such as is evidenced by the Article's Author --RRB-.

«By further reflecting that the clearest evidence would be requisite to make any sane man believe in the miracles by which Christianity is supported, — that the more we know of the fixed laws of nature the more incredible, do miracles become, — that the men at that time were ignorant and credulous to a degree almost incomprehensible by us, — that the Gospels can not be proved to have been written simultaneously with the events, — that they differ in many important details, far too important as it seemed to me to be admitted as the usual inaccuracies of eyewitness; — by such reflections as these, which I give not as having the least novelty or value, but as they influenced me, I gradually came to disbelieve in Christianity as a divine revelation.

(By the way, a book written two thousand years ago, in a dead language, that got edited three hundred years after its parts were written, and also conflicts with itself, is not evidence... any more than Spiderman comics are evidence that there exists a man with Spidey senses).

historical Jesus, lmfao... show me any historical evidence of jesus... let's start with his remains... they don't exist - your explanation, he rose to the heavens... historical evidence - no remains, no proof of existence (not a disproof either, just not a proof)... then let's start with other historians writing about the life of Jesus around his time or shortly after, as outside neutral observers... that doesn't exist either (not a disproof again, just not a proof)... we can go on and on... the fact is, there is not a single proving evidence of Jesus's life in an historical context... there is no existence of Jesus in a scientific context either (virgin birth... riiiiiight)... it is just written in a book, and stuck in your head... you have a right to believe in what you must... just don't base it on history or science... you believe because you do... it is your right... but try not to put reason into your faith; that's when you start sounding unreasonable, borderline crazy...

As I wrote, you can't use reason or logic, based on EVIDENCE when conversing with people who will use the word «faith» as a retort, or counter point.

But with the resurrection of Jesus, while we have witnesses and the documents they wrote, it is not so much what they say that convinces us of the historical fact of the resurrection, but the simple fact that such witnesses and documents actually exist which provides the greatest evidence for the resurrection.

Oh, and my well - written and thoughtful posts are evidence that I am «playing the game» with believer, I'm just not playing the game of accepting his ridiculous terms.

As of yet no Intelligent design creationist has given anything but «faith» or «words» written down in a book equivalent to many other «holy» books with different and competing gods all throughout history that also have no verifiable evidence.

There are library filled with books, written by great men on the subject, but alas religion has only one passage in one book, in one chapter to use as scientific evidence.

Another bit of prima facie evidence that might be considered in favor of Hartshorne's «personalism» is that in Virgilius Ferm's 1945 classic Encyclopedia of Religion, a work to which Brightman contributed forty articles, 14 and in which Brightman had particular editorial input, 15 the article on «God, as personal» was written by none other than Charles Hartshorne.16 This, along with Brightman's review of me Divine Relativity (cited below), suggests that Brightman himself considered Hartshorne a personalist.

Theocracy is based on studies of an old book or two written by philosophers and politicians in addition to stories handed down over generations with no real physical evidence to analyze.

but its 100 % false with zero evidence other than a man - written book

if you can lie to yourself with immunity, you might be an atheist if you think the indifferent support your side, you might be an atheist if you don't think at all, you might be an atheist if you are drawn to religious discussions thinking someone wants to hear your opinion, you might be an atheist if you copy paste every piece of crap theory you find, you might be an atheist if you think you are right no matter what the evidence shows, you might be an atheist if you can't hold your water when you think about science, you might be an atheist if you can't write the word God, with proper capitalization, you might be an atheist if you think your view has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you think The View has enough support to be a percentage of the seven billion people on earth, you might be an atheist if you live in a tar paper shack, writing manifestos, you might be an atheist if you think you're basically a good person, and your own final authority you might be an atheist if you think your great aunt Tillie was a simian, you might be an atheist if you own an autographed copy of Origin Of The Species, you might be an atheist if you think that when you die you're worm food, you might be an atheist if you think the sun rises and sets for you alone, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is Charles Darwin when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if all you can think about is you when you're with your significant other, you might be an atheist if you attend a church but palm the offering plate when it passes, you might be an atheist If think this exhausts all the possibilities of definition, you might be an atheist.

when they wrote it and how life was when they wrote it, believe it or not, I have faith if you REALLY study the bible and all aspects of it, you will see its weaknesses... for those who believe are known for the lack of knowledge of there own faith, for those who are PROPERLY educated with open minds, quickly loose there faith when they are saturated with the false evidence that's abundantly around us each day..

After going into some of the theories of how the evidence about Jesus could have been «tampered» with along the way, he then shows how each theory does not have the evidence to support it, and in the following chapters, goes «link by link» through the chain of custody to show how the Gospel records we have today are an accurate reflection of what was originally written down, and are also an accurate account of what actually happened during the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

It is this misunderstand and lack of knowledge that leads people to contemplate and assert the existence of god with no real proof or evidence other than a sacred collection of texts written over the last few thousand years.

In the case of Moore, where the circumstantial evidence is much stronger and to me relatively persuasive, Wilson himself writes: «Nobody would ever quite know, truly know, what he had shared with [Moore] in those early days.»

Because a book written by unknown authors with absolutely no actual evidence for any supernatural claim, a book the Smithsonian says is not historical, says so?

«Preliminary evidence suggests that Christian leaders» efforts to reach out to Muslim religious leaders have been effective in providing Christians in certain areas of Nigeria and Kenya with greater security,» Dowd wrote.

Graham collections also show a Bible written in the Algonquin language, ample evidence of Graham's fruitful cooperation with Native Americans, and images of his children and their ministries.

no matter what you pull out of your boot to refute the list of failed biblical prophecies i have provided you with — nothing — and i mean absolutely nothing you can come up with with provide the planet with substantiated evidence of the validity of the words written in those books — or prove the existence of your imaginary god.

By imaginative association of this peculiarity of Paul's prose with other evidences of this quality in experience we can come close to knowing what it was that made him write so.

Marc Herman's job with PAW, he writes in Harper's magazine, «was to research book banning in the public schools and, particularly, to investigate evidence of censorship promulgated by the religious right.»

She writes that «while many modernists saw scriptural discrepancies as evidence that the Bible was not «true,» postmodernists would attribute discrepancies to the pluralistic situatedness of interpretation,» making the Bible a more true - to - life and authentic account of human interaction with the divine.

The world has grown up from 2000 years ago, when you could state back then: «He walked on water» and parted the «Red Sea» and the authors of these stories wrote them 50 - 1000 years after the perceived events, along with unverifiable evidence as proof.

Eminent doctors, scientists, professors and thinking men and women accept it with the evidence from the New Testament written by Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.

Consider this... a person goes to college, gets a four year degree in archaeology (or some antiquities preservation analog); spends summers sifting through sand and rock and gravel, all the while taking graduate level classes... person eventually obtains the vaunted PhD in archaeology... then works his / her tail off seeking funding for an archeological excavation, with the payoff being more funding, and more opportunities to dig in the dirt... do you think professional archaeologists are looking hard for evidence of the Exodus on a speculative basis... not a chance... they know their PhD buys them nothing more than a job at Tel Aviv Walmart if they don't discover and publish... so they write grants for digs near established sites / communities, and stay employed sifting rock in culturally safe areas... not unless some shepard stumbles upon a rare find in an unexpected place do you get archeological interest and action in remote places... not at all surprising that the pottery and other evidence of the Exodus and other biblical events lie waiting to be discovered... doesn't mean not there... just not found yet...

Atheists rely on evidence and science; theists rely on primitive texts written decades after imagined events with no evidence whatsoever to support the stories.

If you were familiar with my posting history that many times evidences over 6 or 7 paragraphs of all - original writing and sometimes over 500 - 800 words you'd realize how stupid of a statement you just made..

Its only a mystery to those who either from genuine ignorance or cynical pandering want to equate actually looking at the world and doing research based on evidence with what a book written thousands of years ago by pastoral tribes that claims to be divinely inspired despite being contradictory and getting numerous things wrong.

The task of a non-Muslim scholar writing about Islam is that of constructing an exposition that will do justice to the Western academic tradition, by growing directly out of the objective evidence and by being rationally coherent both within itself and with all other knowledge, and at the same time will do justice to the faith in men's hearts by commanding their assent once it is formulated.