Sentences with phrase «with wrong answers»

So when my kids came home with wrong answers I would tell them «good», now you will never forget the right answer.

«It's almost never that we fail because we come up with the wrong answer,» a partner once said.

With each wrong answer, the shock level was increased.

After reversing the order of questions, the teacher found that the lower achieving students became engaged in the discussion as they gained confidence by responding earlier in the discussion to opinion and experience questions with no wrong answer.

The more clever the students, the more likely they were to end up with the wrong answer, because the more plausible theories they could throw out, and the more prone to substituting their relatively cheap guesses for digging out the real answer.

Even when there should be no other assumption than exactly equal we somehow manage to come up with the wrong answer.

Regardless of who it has and has not worked for, this is a very personal decision with no wrong answer.

Not exact matches

Most people are preoccupied with looking for answers, without realizing that they might be asking the wrong questions in the first place.

In the same vein, some interviewers may be a little bit too focused on what a candidate's answers are, with right and wrong answers preloaded in their brains and notepads.

To answer what's wrong with that, imagine a powerful blowtorch focused on your legs for a prolonged period.

And that's the thing with money — there often isn't a right or wrong answer.

As with many aspects of trading, there is no right or wrong answer to this question.

Until someone has all the answers with proven science or religion it makes no sense to argue about who is right or wrong.

Start with that one Bill and get back to me (of course the only real answer is the bible is wrong, but let's see you have a go at it.

How dare you claim to know all the answers and that anyone who disagrees with you is wrong?

â $ œDonâ $ ™ t let others spoil your faith and joy with their philosophy, wrong and shallow answers based on manâ $ ™ s thoughts and ideas rather than what Christ has taughtâ $ (Col. 2:8)

Sometimes saying «Yes, there's something wrong with me, let's please not get into it» is the easiest answer.

If we ask ourselves, «what is wrong with the world today,» our first answer should be: we are.

«He was just the wrong man for the wrong time, which is nothing to do with him as a person,» said Christopher M. Bellitto, author of the book «101 Questions and Answers on Popes and the Papacy.»

Oh midday given the fact that I have answered that same post 5 times already with different applicable verses and proved you wrong 100 percent of the time I think that's good enough to prove you are full of feces.

I don't see anything intrinsically wrong with not having an answer to every question.

The problem comes with a few folks who still can't accept their assumptions might be wrong even after learning that there's wide consensus on the answer by those who've studied it.

By all means, you've had MANY chances to come up with it... or are you simply avoiding the answer because there IS NO SUCH PROCESS, and you can't admit you are wrong?

The issue of organs is very important because you still have not answered the big question, at what point is it wrong to kill the continuation of human life, which we both agree continues with the sper.m and egg and why is it at that point and not before?

If I were a traditionalist Catholic, I would ask Wuthnow these questions: What is wrong with «ready - made» answers?

At the same time, it was clear that, for all their wrong - headed and occasionally malicious attacks on the Church, these ladies were giving voice to something which was also generally felt within society and particularly by younger women who knew nothing of the Network or its antics but who were not comfortable with answering the Church's critics.

You can start with simple things like answering the questions, staying on subject and recognizing when you are wrong.

scott god also told us not to judge, so let cleflo do cleflo and you do you if you do nt understand how to percieve gods word than it could also be you i remember when i first got saved i was taught a lots of religion stuff but i kept running after god and not after man and he revile some things to me thur his holy spirit watch what you say about gods people cause we all have issues and with that being said be blessed and if hes doing wrong by gods word than he has to answer to god not you so why set yourself up to be curse for it god do nt need your help in nothing stay free cause who god set free is free indeed.

A consequence of this is that a person can be «right», but their being right isn't evidence that someone else with a different answer is «wrong».

If we are completely honest with ourselves (and with the Old Testament text), I think the answer we give to the question «Is it wrong to call God Allah?»

Jeremy Myers, i think you are wrong and David is right, so many out there are preaching you can live any way you want and be right that Grace covers any sin, they really believe that, that is not what the bible says, God was very concerned about sin so much he sent Jesus his son to die on a cross for us, if we accept Jesus as our savor then we are to obey his commandments, not break them, we are to live a righteous and holy life as possible, the bible plainly list a whole list of things if we live in will not to to heaven unless we repent, if we die while in these sins, we will not go to heaven, what is the difference, between someone who said a prayer and someone who did not, and they are living the same way, none, i think, if we are truly saved it should be hard to do these things let alone live and do them everyday, i would be afraid to tell people that it does not matte grace covers their sins, i really think it is the slip ups that we are convicted of by the Holy Spirit and we ask for forgivness, how can anyones heart be right with God and they have sex all the time out of marriage, lie, break every commandment of God, i don't think this is meaning grace covers those sins, until they repent and ask for forgiveness, a lot of people will end up in hell because preachers teach Grace the wrong way,, and those preachers will answer to God for leading these people the wrong way, not saying you are one of them, but be careful, everything we teach or preach must line up with the word of God, God hates sin,

Unlike you however I am not angry at or frustrated by those who disagree with me, because, like you I can not prove you are wrong and I am not going to waste my time trying, nor am I going to call you names and say you are closed minded in your conviction that science can answer all questions, in time.

We think that Christianity is about being «happy, happy, happy all the time,» seeing God miraculously answer all our prayers, and have all of our Christian friends surround us with financial and emotional support every time the least little thing goes wrong.

This is a complex and not easily definable issue and anyone with «easy» answers in my view is not admitting the fallen and terrible condition of mankind in general and that as much as we would attempt to make categorical statements as to «all war is wrong» or «war is the right soultion» we are making statements that just cant stand up to either biblical exegesis or the reality of the world we live in.

They come across as people who have all the answers and everybody else who does not agree with them is wrong, and is probably condemned to hell.

thats wrong and the men that are behind this will have to answer to a higher authority, if they follow through with this.

Below is a list of the questions Walter Kaiser raises in his book, with a brief summary of his answers and a short statement about why I think his answers are wrong.

answer: None, because there is nothing wrong with the light bulb, it's the system.

(As a side note: If your answer to these questions is «Not one bit» there is something seriously wrong with you.)

Paul clearly states that we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities in high places; He is suppose to be setting a principal and he is in fact destroying the thing that God stand for, serving the flesh and the creation more than the creator who is blessed forever; Man will always have a battle between flesh and spirit; he is more flesh than spirit ever in his dress muscles and tight shirts; which has no place in the spirit;» dealing with matters of the holy ghost «he can speck it but he can «t live it; which is the trouble with a lot of modern day Christians; do as i say not as i do... old fashion parents had the same concept, its not just Eddie he got caught, he was just falling weak to the flesh and his own desires; only thing is, he is responsible for the souls of those under his leadership; He must answer and atone to God for those actions, you think for a moment we are being hard on him; God has a way of letting us know when we are wrong that lets us know we need to change.

Consider the parable of the workers in the vineyard and this statement therein: «But he answered one of them, and said, Friend, I do thee no wrong: didst not thou agree with me for a penny?

Some honest Christians answer these issues with statements like; I can't explain why but it must be wrong because it conflicts with the bible.

In answer to the criticism that WCC is syncretistic because of its program for inter-religious dialogue, Thomas said that if the word syncretism denotes all processes of interpenetration between cultures and religions, the only answer to a wrong syncretism, which means the uncritical, superficial, normless mixing of basically incompatible religious concepts and cultural attitudes, is a Christ - centered syncretism which grapples with and evaluates all concepts and attitudes critically in the light of Jesus Christ and converts them into vehicles for communicating the truth of the Gospel and for expressing its meaning for life.

I answered that the priest was my uncle [well, E's honorary uncle actually] and that there was nothing wrong with his personal hygiene.

His answer to that question was that, while there is general agreement as to what is wrong with the world, the real problem is that we can not agree on what would be right.

With nowhere else to turn, these couples find wrong and damaging answers in magazines, television, movies, porn and more.

What could possibly be wrong with having the answer?

No answers in your last part of the post about what was wrong with what I stated, your age or why are you in the fray.

There is nothing wrong with having an answer as long as we are willing to look at other possibilities.

From my perspective, nothing is wrong with having the answer, but is the answer true, or can we KNOW (at this moment in time) if the answer is true, or what the answer is?