The result: «these invisible walls often concentrate education dollars
within affluent school districts, and ensure that low - income students are kept on the outside.»
Not exact matches
Two such
schools of thought have been North American process theology based on the philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead and liberation theology which originated in the struggles of Third World peoples for economic, political, and social independence but now has broadened to include the aspiration of minority groups (e.g., women and blacks) even
within affluent First World countries.
«Research on both inequality across
schools and tracking
within schools has suggested that students in more
affluent schools and top tracks are given the kind of problem - solving education that befits the future managerial class, whereas students in lower tracks and higher - poverty
schools are given the kind of rule - following tasks that mirror much of factory and other working - class work.»
Though they all wrestle with personal problems — for example, the
affluent student suffers from depression brought on by the death of his father, who suffered from a drug addiction — their experiences
within school vary in predictable ways.
Students receive preference
within their geographic catchment areas, and students from
affluent families are more likely to have the preparation needed for admissions to selective
schools.
As noted the one district
school in Arizona's top 10, Gilbert's Classical Academy, is designed as an academically rigorous «choice»
school within a more
affluent community, Gilbert.
Other white and
affluent parents choose private
schools, either because their children are not accepted to their first choice of public
schools, or because they are bothered by the racial separation
within and between New York public
schools.
BBI, which is located in an
affluent suburb of Auckland, has three other
schools that serve seventh - and eighth - year students (the equivalent of sixth - and seventh - graders in the U.S.)
within a three - mile radius.
This makes the new goal set by the major charter
school networks, to grade themselves on the percentage of their students who go on to earn four - year college degrees in six years, all the more radical — especially given the fact that these networks educate low - income, minority students, whose college graduation rates pale in comparison to their more
affluent white peers — a mere 9 percent earning degrees
within six years, compared with 77 percent of students from high - income families as of 2015.
Many Bay Area
schools show a large gap in performance not only between low - income students and more
affluent peers, but between different racial / ethnic groups
within the same economic status.