Sentences with phrase «without agreeing to change»

Earlier this week, Lyft filed a proposal to settle a lawsuit for $ 12.3 million without agreeing to change its classification.

Not exact matches

The ethical problems are obvious: You're changing the terms of discourse without the other person agreeing to do that.

Great leaders know that while everyone doesn't have to agree, they won't get much done by arguing, and opinions can be changed without forcing your own on someone else.

While SIFMA «has long supported a best interest standard for all advisors,... we remain concerned that the DOL's rule could force significant changes to current relationships, which may leave clients without the help they need to prepare for retirement, at a time when we all agree that more can and should be done.»

Facebook just announced changes to some of those data - sharing APIs to better ensure that agreeing to share your own data won't let those outside companies collect data about your friends without their permission.

However, agreeing to initiate a hard fork without knowing how speculators will react to such a change comes with risks.

By using TheRedPin, Brokerage users agree that TheRedPin, Brokerage reserves the right to modify or change the Terms at its sole discretion and without prior or post notice.

«Yes I agree with all that, and we welcomed the change in fiscal policy because it meant we could keep forecast inflation on target without having to cut interest rates, which we would otherwise have done.

You can point out the sin without being judgmental, you can love the sinner but you can not agree with societal changes in ordr to be popular with culture... just to get people in church.

It is understood A2 would not have settled without Lion agreeing to remove the term «contains A2 protein» from its labels, and it is expected Lion will change its labels in the next two months.

Also jimmy jazz again great name by the way i think the fact were 6th in ayer purchases and i agree without kane spurs would be below without kaneuckeu them for now but i see laca will be better next year and auba will have had a taste of the rigorous epl and because its a world cup year we need stability with wenger for atleast another year i think were vying for that spot and wi th cazorla coming back and hopfully Jack signs with a couple good signings if we splash some cash and ozil already signed we could surprise the league next year with a very strong season and Leicester surprised apparently everybody but us cause we handled them well that year but no one else dod and we finished second but i think its not so good for a big club like us with internationals in a world cup year to change managers do it in a non world cup year cause you only have a couple weeks with your players maybe less with some before season starts

this is one great article i absolutely agree with you, but i do nt mind it when some fans want a different manager as long as they respect wenger cause we have to admit that this season could be seen as a failure and the football we played wasnt really great too, so i support wenger fully but i understand the guys who want a change but some wobs do nt understand that one can ask for a change without disrespecting and making somebody out to be stupid

Well let's NOT Google «Arsenal fan polls» as opinions change over time, so let us have a reflection of what us Gooners think right now, without any games to distract us, and see if we can get a FACTUAL figure on the actual percentage of JustArsenal readers who agree or disagree with Jon.

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

That said, I do agree on the signings point — my main argument is that if you believe we need them then an explanation of why and how this would change the squad would be more enjoyable to read than a simple statement of facts and then an opinion without analysis.

Even if you don't agree with your partner's decision, be respectful and work with your partner to try to make a change without involving the kids.

Additionally, workers would have to agree to opt out and be able to change their mind at any point in the next three months without being penalised.

It would force conformity (everyone being the same) without unanimity (everyone agreeing to the change).

Under the compact concept, states could essentially agree to follow a popular vote model without a constitutional change....)

A letter from Smith and the shadow welfare secretary, Debbie Abraham, to the Northern Ireland secretary, James Brokenshire, warns: «This measure is being introduced in the absence of a functioning executive in Northern Ireland... To impose such changes from Westminster, especially through the back door of a statutory instrument without scrutiny even by committee, is completely at odds with principles of the devolution settlement as agreed under the Good Friday agreement and subsequent agreements, including Fresh Start.&raquto the Northern Ireland secretary, James Brokenshire, warns: «This measure is being introduced in the absence of a functioning executive in Northern Ireland... To impose such changes from Westminster, especially through the back door of a statutory instrument without scrutiny even by committee, is completely at odds with principles of the devolution settlement as agreed under the Good Friday agreement and subsequent agreements, including Fresh Start.&raquTo impose such changes from Westminster, especially through the back door of a statutory instrument without scrutiny even by committee, is completely at odds with principles of the devolution settlement as agreed under the Good Friday agreement and subsequent agreements, including Fresh Start.»

Cuomo proposes a $ 1.1 billion increase in education aid if lawmakers agree to major policy overhauls; without changes, his aid proposal drops to $ 377 million.

Long answer: Every country in the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC)(195 countries in total), plus the institution of the EU (the 196th member) agreed to the terms of the Paris Agreement - the UNFCCC can only pass agreements without objection,...

In interviews, de Blasio administration officials and Albany lawmakers agreed that a three - year extension was the easiest way to maintain the current system of mayoral control without significant changes, a win for de Blasio.

«I said, «if you're willing to take on the unions, and you're willing to make changes and reforms, I'll support a 5 percent increase,»» said Cuomo, who said he has doubts that lawmakers would agree to his ideas without the financial incentive.

Despite the potential for a conflict and the undesirability of a protracted lawsuit, Cornell suggested and Moroney agreed upon a change in the language of the resolution to stress the urgency and dangerousness of the situation without characterizing the town's actions as reckless.

«Experts agree that this level can not be sustained for many decades without potentially catastrophic consequences,» reports the Geos Institute, an Oregon - based non-profit and consulting firm that uses science to help people predict, reduce and prepare for climate change.

I've now done enough of these with interfacing and one without, and about to do another without (taking a change as it's a much lighter weight cotton), and I totally agree.

17.1 You acknowledge and agree that the Company may make changes to, or stop providing, the Apps, the Websites and / or the Services, or restrict your use of the Apps, the Websites and / or the Services, at any time without notifying you in advance.

You agree to be bound by any such changes without further action on the part of either party unless you notify us in writing prior to the effective date of such changes.

You acknowledge and agree that Showtime Networks may suspend or discontinue offering the Application; modify the Application; change or discontinue the Services available through the Application; change how we offer and operate such Services (e.g., to begin charging a fee to access features or Content that we previously made available without charge); remove Content; impose limits on certain features or restrict your access to part or all of the Application, Services and Content; or make other changes in Showtime Networks» product and service offerings at its sole discretion and with or without notice to you.

I agree that some of the tenure language should be changed to make it easier to dismiss teachers who are not doing their jobs, yet this lawsuit was an attempt to gut teacher union protections without really solving the problems of educational inequities.

While she agrees that standards can help shape better teaching for all students, she warns that without careful attention to professional development and the impact of a school's «culture» on change efforts, standards could further penalize students who are already overlooked and underserved.

By Robin Pomeroy JOHANNESBURG, Aug 31 (Reuters)- Ministers at the Earth Summit agreed on Saturday a declaration to support the Kyoto climate change pact without embarrassing the United States, the only major state to shun the treaty.

Once I agreed to buy the vehicle, and pass on the extended contract, there wasn't any additional pressure to change my mind and add more things, things simply proceeded without issue.

If you don't agree with a change your editor made, you can simply reject the change without having to justify yourself.

In reality, you should have a right under law to outright opt - out of any change which adds a fee or changes your APR or minimum payment without agreeing to any alternative change, as any change in the material elements of the credit agreement requires your acceptance to go into effect.

Member acknowledges and agrees that Credit Union may discontinue, and / or change the terms of, Remote Deposit / Mobile Deposit or any related content, features, products or services associated therewith, at any time without notice or liability to Member or any third party.

By continuing to navigate our website without changing your cookie settings, you hereby acknowledge and agree to Help Me Build Credit's use of cookies.

Otherwise, you agree not to assert any rights you may have (a) to be attributed as the author of content, or (b) where we may (sometimes, if necessary) change the content you submit without your permission.

You further agree that you will not (a) use the Website for any illegal or unauthorized purposes that violate any laws (including import, export and copyright laws); (b) download, post, display, publish, copy, distribute, transmit, broadcast or create derivative works from, or otherwise exploit any of the Website Proprietary Contents; (c) alter, edit, delete, remove, change the meaning or appearance of any of the Website Proprietary Contents, including without limitation the removal or alteration of any trademarks, trade names, logos, service marks, copyright notices or any other proprietary notices on any Website Proprietary Contents; (d) attempt to gain unauthorized access to our computer system or engage in any activity that interferes with the performance of, or impairs the functionality of the Website or any goods or services provided through the Website.

I agree with Smil that the rich world could lower its footprint dramatically without any real sacrifice or technological change, in fact monetary savings, and with positive externalities beyond agw, but it's hard to convince people and to ask them to think more about what they do (reusable shopping bags rather than plastic).

I also agree that if complicating factors are introduced that invalidate my assumptions in # 333 about an explanation excluding ozone, one might see cooling without ozone, but I'm not aware of any factor that would actually change the assumptions sufficiently to do that.

Can any review of SLR be complete without an agreed figure for SLR per degree C change; or at least a discussion about why this figure, which has properties similar to a physical «constant», seldom is used in publications or discussions?

While we agree with PBL that the IPCC's statement could easily mislead readers without the proper context, we note that, before quoting the IPCC's projection on rain - fed agriculture, EPA's TSD includes the statement «Agricultural production, including access to food, in many African countries and regions is projected to be severely compromised by climate variability [emphasis added] and change.»

The United States could ethically link non-obligatory climate change actions on other's participation in climate change solutions but must agree to do what ethics requires of it in reducing emissions without regard to the actions of others.

That is, it is not sufficient to simply examine what happened in Cancun without seeing Cancun in the context of the twenty - year negotiating history whose goal has been the prevention of dangerous climate change and the harms that each year of delay in agreeing to a global deal exacerbate.

(See, Brown, 2011 for a discussion of specific practical consequences that follow from recognition that climate change is an ethical problem) These consequences include that nations should commit to do what their ethical responsibilities, obligations, and duties requires of them without regard to whether all other nations are agreeing to do so.

Talking about Loss and Damage without agreeing on compensation is unfair, and is delaying an urgent action to current and future destructive impacts of climate change on those most vulnerable.

Rich countries have tried to switch the storyline by agreeing to broad ideas of stopping climate change without stepping forward to provide adequate support.

Regarding long term outcomes, I tend to agree with flxible that even short term outcomes don't look good but it seems to me that Wasdell is at least showing that if the international community wants to avoid 2C (because of some arbitrary idea of where dangerous climate change will kick in, agreed on years ago) then it can't do it without removing atmospheric greenhouse gases and so any notion that some emissions reduction agreement can do the trick are delusions.