Sentences with phrase «without children so»

And it is considered a major reason why empty nesters and couples without children so frequently share their homes — and their hearts — with pets.

Your first visit will be with the therapist without your child so they can help you create a better understanding of what is going on with your child.

This is done without the child so that parents may speak freely about the difficulties the child is encountering without having to worry about censoring information that may wound little egos.

Not exact matches

When a team member at Windsor Regional Hospital leaves work early to watch their child in a sports meet, for example, they can do so without being concerned about being disciplined or using up a valuable vacation day.

Rising prosperity has largely obviated the first and helped the second, along with changing social mores — people who really want children can do so today without having to be permanently tied to a mate, if they are up to the challenge.

Typical entrepreneurs are so preoccupied with ramping up the value of their enterprises that when it comes to an essential issue like retirement planning, they're like the cobbler's children without shoes,» warns Arthur Warren, a retirement - strategy specialist who owns his company, Benefits Advisors of New England, in Franklin, Mass..

Baby carrying keeps your child close to you, so you are able to go through your day without experiencing the anxiety that comes with being their parent.

Also, our journey has taught us how to appreciate and honor children and their needs so that we can raise them without shame and with respect and dignity.

Please turn your child over to childrens services so he can be raised without the abuse of brainwashing!

So I guess a parent of young children would find this thought so reassuring that he or she wouldn't mind leaving the children without one parenSo I guess a parent of young children would find this thought so reassuring that he or she wouldn't mind leaving the children without one parenso reassuring that he or she wouldn't mind leaving the children without one parent?

It is so sad that people believe an benevolent omnipotent creator can't figure out make the world work without murdering children.

The idea that this particular categorical imperative would not bewell served by saying,» if I or my children became mass murders and inspired others to the same ethic so that we could not even receive due process without causing more murder and mayhem, then please put a bullet in our heads.»

Gay marriage undermines true marriage in a different and much more dangerous way: It hollows out its very essence, applying the word to something else entirely, a relationship that itself has no potential to generate children, and so can not itself (without help from the law or from outsiders) form a family.

Their children were not usually heirs, so they were safe outlets for sex without risking the line of succession.

It's the other way around — we are saved from hell, forever made a child of God, so we are «free» to sin without sacrificing that position.

It is therefore of the utmost importance that a child's language difficulties be taken seriously and that remedial measures be applied without delay, since his whole future as a person so largely depends on competence in the use of symbols.

It is just as much a part of our physiology as it is to nurture our children, and most all mammals accomplish that (as well as goodwill to their own kind) without so much as the knowledge of a god.

The very basic Christian tenant states that we are «our brother's keeper» and so to insist that a pregnancy be continued until its completion without also insisting that the woman and resulting child receive all the health care they will need is a distorted view of both Christianity and «pro-life.»

How did language ever develop without teachers when a child's window of linguistic receptivity is so very limited?

So, I pray that as I grow in my faith and as my children experience their own challenges... be it that one chooses to be a pastor or my daughter chooses a life of servitude as a nun that they will also always know that the Lord gives them the freedom to make changes and seek him in whatever way they need to without compromising the fact that he died for us to save us.

One in 50 adults - totalling almost a million people - said they had used a food bank, while one in 25 said they went without meals so their children or others in their homes could eat, the online survey showed.

So, she wants the child's happiness and doesn't say or do anything to him to correct him running across the street without looking.

My children speak of him naturally and happily, without the embarrassment or fear that so many adults feel in hearing his name.

The growth counselor's function is to help such persons as they work through their resistance to bury a dead relationship; uncouple without infighting so as to avoid further hurt to each other and to their children; agree on a plan for the children that will be best for the children's mental health; work through the ambivalent feelings that usually accompany divorce — guilt, rage, release, resentment, failure, joy, loss — so that each person's infected grief wound can heal; discover what each contributed to the disintegration of their relationship; learn the relationship - building and love - nurturing skills which each will need either to enjoy creative singlehood or to establish a better marriage.

So why are we taking parenting advice again from someone without children or isn't a credible child psychologist?

If you want to believe in a religion, so be it, but for «god's» sake, please allow your children to see and absorb all that is around them, without your bigoted narrow view.

@brad: Yes, let's laugh at Planned Parenthood that provides cheap or free healthcare to women in need while we try to defund them so women are left without breast exams, and yearly checkups in a country where the idea of having comprehensive healthcare for every man, woman and child is considered an evil encroachment on freedom.

Some challenge specific parts of the curriculum (mandatory AIDS education, New York City's distribution of condoms to schoolchildren without the knowledge or consent of the parents, textbooks that propagate anti-Christian doctrines, gym - class dress requirements at odds with the modest dress required of Hindu, Muslim, and other children, «values clarification» classes that teach that there is no objective source of right and wrong, and so forth).

Their children were not usually heirs, so they were safe outlets for se» x without risking the line of succession.

They isolate their play places with sound - proofed glass and have tables for the parents just on the other side so that they can keep on eye on their kids without having to endure the ear - splitting shrieks that inevitably follow (and yes, I have a child).

By extension every good deed, every struggle for justice and deliverance from oppression, every effort to care for and show concern about those who are in need, will be not merely a reflection of the divine mercy and righteousness but also an instrument for the bringing about of just such shalom or «abundance of life» for God's human children, So one might go on, almost without ceasing, to show that response in faith to the action of God in this vivid moment has its implications and applications for the whole range of human life and experience.

Sweeney, more than any of the others, wonders if he can anchor his children without the faith that so moored him.

Remember, the parents themselves do not give the child his form (the spiritual soul) because they only contribute something material, namely a sperm and an ovum; and their own souls — being spiritual and so without parts — can not divide to provide a soul for their offspring.

I think most of the Americans are in lost... as most of them do not know who their father is and it is very unfortunate... even if they know who their father is, the mom has children from diff men outside of marriage... and while a child is being raised, watching what his / her parents do to enjoy their life... so things become normal when they grow up... like if you go back early nineteen century, women were not allowed to go to beach without being covered... and now it totally opposite... if you do not have a boyfriend or girlfriend before 15, the parents worries that their teenage has some problem... and lot more can be listed... And then you go to Church, what our children learn from there... they see in front of the Church an old man's statue with long beard standing with extending of both hand... some of the status are blank, white, Spanish and so on... so they are being taught God as an old dude... then you learn from Catholic that you pray to Jesus, Mother Marry, Saints, Death spirit and all these... the poll shows a huge number of young American turns to Atheism or believing there is no God and so on... Its hard to assume where these nations are going with the name of modernization... nothing wrong having scientists discovered the cure of aids or the pics from mars but... we should all think and learn from our previous generations and correct ourselves... also ppl are becoming so much slave of material things...

Suppose, they say, there are seven brothers and the oldest dies without a child and his widow marries the next, who also dies without a child, and so she goes down the line with each new husband dying without a child, until she marries the seventh and youngest brother who also dies childless.

And they got upset and were trying to figure things out and finally became so frustrated that the Law was so hard to follow and God kept sending them into captivity and there was so much death and eventually the prophets started prophesying about a day that would come where the hearts of the fathers would return to their children and a sacrifice that would be the final sacrifice so that they could all stop killing so many animals (which God also admitted He never wanted in the first place because that was not the point), and also that God would eventually wipe out the old system and write his law on their hearts and minds so that they could finally follow him without making so many mistakes and messing up everything.

As a child I used to suffer tortures of shyness, and if my shoe - lace was untied would feel shamefacedly that every eye was fixed on the unlucky string; as a girl I would shrink away from strangers and think myself unwanted and unliked, so that I was full of eager gratitude to any one who noticed me kindly; as the young mistress of a house I was afraid of my servants, and would let careless work pass rather than bear the pain of reproving the ill - doer; when I have been lecturing and debating with no lack of spirit on the platform, I have preferred to go without what I wanted at the hotel rather than to ring and make the waiter fetch it.

The woman can not bring forth children without her man, (so her desire shall be for her husband, Gen. 3:16), while the man has no future at all without his woman, whom he now realizes is «the mother of all living» (Gen. 3:20).

And if Jesus, being the only one without sin, had the power to condemn and kill this woman, but didn't do so, then what makes this man think he has the right to cast stones at and condemn other children of God???? It's not right!

but thats not what i'm talking about... i am discussing the god you claim to worship... even if you believe jesus was god on earth it doesn't matter for if you take what he had to say as law then you should take with equal fervor words and commands given from god itself... it stands as logical to do this and i am confused since most only do what jesus said... the dude was only here for 30 years and god has been here for the whole time — he has added, taken away, and revised everything he has set previous to jesus and after his death... thru the prophets — i base my argument on the book itself, so if you have a counter argument i believe you haven't a full understanding of the book — and that would be my overall point... belief without full understanding of or consideration to real life or consequences for the hereafter is equal to a childs belief in santa which is why we atheists feel it is an equal comparision... and santa is clearly a bs story... based on real events from a real historical person but not a magical being by any means!

So as a foster parent I would bring my children up firstly to LOVE everyone, regardless of their habits, sins and beliefs, and to know that despite sins, Jesus loves us and we are called to love others too and accept and welcome everyone without judgement.

It is not necessary for certain ideas to have evolved, as is evidenced by other cultures (not to say in any way that they are wrong, however, there are practices that oppose the morals ingrained in us by the society we live in) so could a parent raise perfectly good children without the bible, in this day in age, probably yes, but you must recognize, that much of what they will be teaching will come from their society, adn quite honestly I'm not sure honoring your parents, and not killing are such a bad thing.

Make sure to turn away when riding in your Republican limo so you won't have to risk seeing the many good Catholics in Tampa, the many people who will be without aid to women, infants and children that your fat cat buddies want to cut while they protect their friend's Swiss bank accounts and their defense contractor masters unnecessary contracts.

We must also provide real support to women and children so that unplanned pregnancies can be faced without the fear and desperation that leads to the abortionist's office.

When we of the so - called better classes are scared as men were never scared in history at material ugliness and hardship; when we put off marriage until our house can be artistic, and quake at the thought of having a child without a bank - account and doomed to manual labor, it is time for thinking men to protest against so unmanly and irreligious a state of opinion.

So, either God is a rather poor parent who doesn't raise his «children'to be anyway independent of him, like a proper parent should, or he has and we atheists are his mature offspring who can carry on with our lives after he has left our lives, or we are all really «orphans» without divine parents, but only some of us actually realize this.

The contraceptive promise that the feminist movement made to women goes something like this, «you will be free from fertility, so you can enjoy sexual relations without fear of having a child; you will be slim and beautiful and also can enter the workplace, just like men do, finding fulfillment through your accomplishments.»

In that sense, NFP marks a «moral minimum», a way of avoiding children without sin - when there are serious reasons to do so.

Second, and more crucially, that secular objection (as in the hippie saying I heard so often in my youth: «Don't lay your value trips on me, man») rests on the assumption that someone can authentically sexually donate himself to another without making a definitive commitment to the other person; that is, he can «hedge his bets,» so speak, without paying the consequences ¯ a foolish assumption given the rates of sexually transmitted diseases, the divorce rates, the numbers of children born out of wedlock, and so forth.

They are our nearest and dearest — our husband or wife, our children, a few people we can't imagine living without or their living without us — and the sadness is that we have known them so long and so well that we don't really see them anymore for who they truly are — let alone who they truly are to us, who we truly are to them.