Sentences with phrase «without compelling evidence»

The right to suspend political rights, even without compelling evidence or evidence that has been tested, is now the norm.

Without compelling evidence, scientists wouldn't have shifted away from it.

On the industrial side, the Clean Air Act demonstrates that regulatory policies can reduce pollution without any compelling evidence for the kinds of economic trauma sometimes anticipated.

Not exact matches

Court orders demanding death row inmates to provide «specific, detailed and concrete alternatives» to a state's lethal injection protocol compel those inmates to produce evidence that is impossible to obtain without forcing physicians and other clinicians to violate their medical ethics, according to Harvard bioethicists and legal experts.

But by showing how carbonate globules, similar to those in the martian meteorite, formed without the involvement of living organisms, Steele and his colleagues have made less compelling the argument that the visiting rock from our planetary neighbor contains evidence of life.

Another glaring mistake is presuming that the audience believes Brian is talented and likable without every really establishing any compelling evidence.

These data provide evidence that science content can be transmitted through innovative online techniques without sacrificing compelling content or effective pedagogical strategies.

Fail to establish that any such conspiracy exists because the evidence for it is worthless, and a distinct problem arises: the main people behind these cases may be compelled to explain why they didn't know the evidence was totally without merit.....

While Maibach's formulation may be the most compelling one, it would be fraudulent to use it without evidence that all 97 % of climate scientists based their opinions on their own independent evaluation of the evidence, rather than on the opinions of other climate scientists whom they trusted.

Returning to the Mediation Directive, Art 7 represents, no doubt, the outcome of a committee - based compromise, by seeking to impose a broadly based privilege for mediators (and others «involved in the administration of the mediation process») against being compelled to give evidence in civil proceedings arising out of or in connection with a mediation process, subject only to two very narrowly drawn exceptions, which would not appear to recognise any of the established exceptions to the without prejudice principle, save indirectly perhaps the fourth.

However, it is difficult to accept that it could be in the interests of justice for the court to annul or discharge its own ruling without a compelling reason to do so, such as changed circumstances or fresh evidence.

United States First Circuit, 10/11/2010 US v. Brown Defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although the district court's factual findings and the inferences made from those findings, which formed the basis of its conclusion that reasonable suspicion existed to stop a car, are not compelled by the record or by the facts, both are nonetheless reasonable and therefore pass constitutional muster; 2) the affirmance of the district court's finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car forecloses the need to address defendant's challenge to the district court's alternate conclusion that the car was not seized when the officers first approached; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress evidence without an evidentiary hearing.

If he is a cop and suspects or even knows with moral certainty that there is evidence of a crime captured on the video, then he can get a warrants, and without a warrant, you are not compelled to turn over the goods.

The applicants submitted that to compel them to give evidence without anonymity would constitute a breach of their right to life under Art 2 of the Convention.

Given that violence against adults, animals, and criminals to change their behavior is illegal, Gershoff questions why violence against children to change their behavior should be socially sanctioned, especially without clear and compelling evidence that it results in desirable outcomes.