This consent order concerns unlawful conduct by Private Air, Inc., (Private Air) in which the company held itself out as a direct air carrier, 1 when it was not, and engaged in foreign air transportation as an indirect air carrier2
without the economic authority to do so, in contravention of 49 U.S.C. § 41301.
Specifically, in the fall of 2009, Ronald E. Mays, through City Skies, over which he exercised primary control and direction, engaged in air transportation as an indirect air carrier
without economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns unauthorized interstate air service provided by Scott Air LLC d / b / a Island Air Express (Scott), a company
without economic authority from the Department, that violated 49 U.S.C. § 41101 and constituted an unfair and deceptive practice prohibited by 49 U.S.C. § 41712.
Not exact matches
Without a robust legal framework, the US relinquishes its global
economic authority.
Principle 16, so necessary for immediate application, reads: «National
authorities should endeavor to promote the internalization of environmental costs and the use of
economic instruments, taking into account the approach that the polluter should, in principle, bear the cost of pollution, with due regard to the public interest and
without distorting international trade and investment».
The
Economic and Financial Crimes Commission on Thursday arraigned a ship, MT Vine, and its six - man crew for allegedly dealing in 1,080 metric tonnes of Automated Gas Oil
without lawful
authority.
Teachout added that she opposed granting «fast - track
authority» to the president to negotiate
economic treaties
without input from Congress.
Since at least April 2010, Capital Airways has engaged in air transportation
without holding the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
Since at least 2009, Mr. Pareti and Global, a business entity over which he exercises absolute ownership, direction, and control, have engaged in the provision of air transportation as an indirect air carrier
without holding requisite
economic authority from the Department of Transportation.
For a period of time in 2011, I - Jet engaged in the provision of air transportation
without holding requisite
economic authority from the Department of Transportation.
This consent order concerns unauthorized service by Traffic Management Corporation, d / b / a TMC Airlines (hereinafter TMC) and Contract Cargo Airlines, Inc. (hereinafter CCA), both of which performed operations as common carriers
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns unauthorized service by Classic Limited Air, Inc., (CLA) which performed operations as a common carrier
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns unauthorized air carrier operations by Calypso Airline, Inc. (Calypso) which engaged in air transportation
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns unauthorized service by A-Liner-8 Aviation, Inc., (A-Liner-8) which, according to the Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings (Enforcement Office), performed operations as a common carrier
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns Avia Aviation, Ltd., (Avia) a foreign air carrier within the meaning of 49 U.S.C. § 40102 (a)(21), that engaged in air transportation between the United States and Canada
without effective
economic authority from the U.S. Department of Transportation in violation of 49 U.S.C. § § 41301 and 41712.
This consent order concerns unauthorized air carrier operations by DB Air, Ltd. (DB Air), in which it engaged in air transportation as an air carrier
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns service by Red Apple Aviation, Inc., (Red Apple) that constituted operations in common carriage
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
This consent order concerns unauthorized service by Sky King, Inc., which performed operations as a common carrier
without the requisite
economic authority from the Department.
He noted (among other things) the decision of the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in Carson v United Kingdom [2010] ECHR 338, (2010) 51 EHRR 13 where (referring to its 2006 decision in Stec and others v UK (2006) 43 EHRR 1017, [2006] All ER (D) 215 (Apr)-RRB-, the court said: «Because of their direct knowledge of their society and its needs, the national
authorities are in principle better placed than the international judge to appreciate what is in the public interest on social or
economic grounds, and the court will generally respect the legislature's policy choice unless it is «manifestly
without reasonable foundation».