Although one can never be 100 % sure, however
without any factual evidence it is best to accept whatever your partner is telling you.
Not exact matches
Intelligent and reasonable people do not believe books like The Babble
without independent,
factual, verifiable and objective
evidence.
You trust that these writers are in fact speaking for God —
without any actual
factual evidence.
AtheistHunter (first off FUCKTARD, you belong in an asylum): You make these claims
without one shred of
factual evidence to back you and you have the audacity to call Atheists arrogant??? You're just a plain ignorant waste of human flesh!!
Truthiness, Merriam - Webster's 2006 word of the year, is «the quality of seeming to be true according to one's intuition...
without regard to logic [or]
factual evidence.»
In fact,
without fear of contradiction, every piece of available
factual evidence, model - free data, refutes it.
Case in point, a new peer - reviewed study has examined the
factual evidence regarding the increased frequency and increased intensity of hail storms that CO2 - centric, global warming climate models predict; and the study has found the predictions to be
without merit.
Gavin, how can anyone respond to Ray's «statement» about Gore's sincerity
without providing (
factual)
evidence about said sincerity?
United States First Circuit, 10/11/2010 US v. Brown Defendant's conviction for possession of cocaine base with intent to distribute is affirmed where: 1) although the district court's
factual findings and the inferences made from those findings, which formed the basis of its conclusion that reasonable suspicion existed to stop a car, are not compelled by the record or by the facts, both are nonetheless reasonable and therefore pass constitutional muster; 2) the affirmance of the district court's finding that the officers had reasonable suspicion to stop the car forecloses the need to address defendant's challenge to the district court's alternate conclusion that the car was not seized when the officers first approached; and 3) there was no abuse of discretion in the district court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress
evidence without an evidentiary hearing.
The Prosecutor should consider whether the hearing can be conducted by a
factual summary and submissions
without the necessity of calling
evidence or by conducting a focused hearing dealing with only issues that are in dispute.
Griffin v. State, 19 A. 3d 415, 421 - 22 (Md.) Generally, a witness authenticating electronic
evidence must «provide
factual specificity about the process by which the electronically stored information is created, acquired, maintained, and preserved
without alteration or change, or the process by which it is produced if the result of a system or process that does so.»
When courts or legislatures do address the principles for adjudicating child custody disputes, they often act
without close attention to
factual complexity, empirical
evidence, or respect for generally prevailing principles of lawmaking... [An] example of thoughtless action in the custody area occurred in the 1980s when several jurisdictions adopted a strong preference for joint custody... [T] he presumption for joint custody was adopted
without careful attention to empirical
evidence or diversity of
factual situations....