Sentences with phrase «without first warming»

Going to work that day without reviewing the basics was like running a race without first warming up.

There is no mechanism that will allow additional energy to escape to the atmosphere from the skin layer WITHOUT FIRST WARMING THE SKIN LAYER.

If you explain how adding CO2 to the atmosphere can cause warming of the surface without first warming itself — I will buy you a Nobel Prize.

Not exact matches

In the past he wouldn't have risked Sanchez either or sent Walcott on without letting him warm up first.

Wenger was to blame for Walcott's injury, He rushed the player on without letting him warm up first!

Enter nanobébé: the first bottle that speeds up the breast milk warming process without compromising nutrients or creating bacteria.

Hat, sunscreen, bug repellent, warms clothes / pj's for chilly nights, smores makins» (yes this is a must have), sleeping bags & blankets to make one big family bed in your tent, life jacket that fits really well, diapers (we still cloth diaper if we are camping near laundry facilites), swim diapers (or we just use a pocket diaper without an insert and find that it works really well to contain what it needs to and doesn't bring on lots of water), first aid kit, flashlight, rain gear, a way to get clean water (filtering it yourself or access to water at the campground), snacks, and a good campsite.

I also keep rice heat packs (for cramp relief), a water bottle that stays cold for a long time, and a salt lamp (for a warm glow without too much light) close by for the first few days.

What this long list of jargon means, for your purposes, is that if you warm up slowly and gently for 12 - 15 minutes, your fat - burning systems will be geared up and ready to go without having to have burned off you muscle glycogen in the first place.

Well, those were my sentiments when I first started eating paleo, but life isn't complete without a slab of warm cornbread slathered in honey butter, so something had to change.

If you start exercising at a strenuous level without warming up first, you will place unnecessary stress on your heart and lungs.

First, I want to share with you a few products that I do not go anywhere during the warmer months without, especially if I know I... Read More

The breathing of warm wind reviving the desolated landscape, the previously denuded branches adorning their wands with tight green buds and precocious white blooms, the feeling of the sunlight's pale kiss... After so long without, the first signs of spring are showing their presence, banishing the chill to memory.

I tried a bunch of new things during the 12 miler though: — new running shoes: Brooks PureCadence 5s, which kind of gave me a blister but I didn't hate them — new arm warmers: HOW did I live without these?!? love love love — iFitness belt: the same one I wore for my first half marathon

Today is the first day I gave myself a few hours to stroll around and I knew I wanted something comfy but far from being boring, and although my first option in winter are pants, the weather has been so nice and warm lately that I was able to wear a dress without tights underneath.

For the past several years, I always used a self tanner on my legs the first couple weeks of spring, when it's warm enough to go without tights.

As meticulously made as the aforementioned films but not half as stuffy, it employs its low - key, dispassionate first half as a springboard to something much warmer and more immediate, all without feeling like two different movies.

Potentially doing any form of stretching, simple or otherwise, without warming your dog up first could do more harm than good.

It was explained to me that this is like a muscle pull or strain, similar to what an athlete might get if they go right into activity without warming up first.

I would first try it without a shirt as crates can get warm BUT if the dog still seems agitated then add the shirt.

Fortunately, there is a beautiful beach right at your doorstep, so you can head to the warm, fine sands first thing in the morning and stay there without being disturbed by anything at all, all day long!

First, they could argue that certain events, even if they are normal catastrophic events, would not have occurred without global warming, they may seek government reimbursement.

I would therefore argue that for the global mean the well - mixed GHGs and the counterbalancing reflecitve aerosol effects are «first - order» — without GHGs there is no appreciable warming signal, and without the aerosols, the warming from GHGs is excessive and important changes in the diurnal cycle and cloudiness are not captured.

Gymnosperm «Additional CO2 will not cause additional ocean warming without first causing additional atmospheric warming.

The letter portends to offer facts about «climate change deniers, but readers can't even get further than the first paragraph without running into an unsupportable talking point about skeptic climate scientists saying global warming «isn't happening / happening, but for natural reasons / happening and caused by humans, but it's not so bad.»

Additional CO2 will not cause additional ocean warming without first causing additional atmospheric warming.

Schemes whereby currents could somehow move the heat from the surface to below 700m without warming the first 700m on average have been proposed, and maybe some are plausible — but warmer water rises.

At the London conference, 80 Professors, 60 Doctors of Science and 40 other experts, including Piers Corbyn, brother of Britain's opposition leader, who has a first - class degree in Astrophysics, were shocked to learn that the error, first introduced a generation ago when climate scientists borrowed feedback math from electronic network analysis without really understanding it, is the reason for their exaggerated predictions of how much global warming Man may cause.

(See, Brown, 2008) This is so because, from a proposition that a problem like global warming creates a particular threat or risk, one can not, however, deduce whether that threat is acceptable without first deciding on certain criteria for acceptability.

The problem is exactly as the First IPCC Assessment says — without understanding past warming we can't say what role GHG have.

Francisco (09:12:57): Go ahead and explain how additional heat in the atmosphere moves from the atmosphere to the ocean surface, and from there to the deep oceans, ** without first producing any warming in the atmosphere or on the ocean surface water ** Just because you don't know how it can happen, does not mean that it is not happening, just that you don't understand how.

We didn't get a ten year period without warming — we got THE FIRST ten year period without warming.

First, funny how we didn't see predictions of ten year periods without warming until AFTER we had a ten year period without warming.

The proper question would be, what are the odds of getting a ten year period without warming during the FIRST TEN YEARS?

It increases monotonically [without reversal], achieving values three and a half degrees warmer by the end of the twenty - first century.

As the lead article points out, the first of these two decades has already passed without such warming, so the IPCC projection was clearly wrong for the first of the two decade..

That only leaves T and V to vary and according to radiative physics V can not vary without first varying T which is where concern about the warming effects of GHGs comes from.

This time it's an anecdote about «extraordinary warming that took place along what is now the northern sea route during the first half of the 16th century», that is flat useless without information showing in which years let alone decades the warming occurred.

«Without first - class science graduates, how will we understand and deal with the crises caused by global warming?»

The first USHCN version added in 0.5 F warming, now they are adding 0.9 F. It's the so - called scientists who can't read a thermometer without their political activism getting in the way.

There are people who would rather drastically manipulate the Earth's environment with technology without understanding the consequences instead of investing first in doing the heavy lifting that would be necessary by humans to reduce the warming of the planet.

On the other hand, we've seen the first 12 years of this century go by without any warming at all, despite all - time record GHG concentrations and short - term forecasts by IPCC of 0.2 C per decade.

In terms of keeping you warm though, even in hOMe which is on the larger spectrum of tiny houses, we stay toasty warm even when it's -10 F. Granted we don't go all the way down to your temps but perhaps you can try it without first and see how it goes?

At first glance, it would seem that the most your «ocean greenhouse effect» could do would be to warm lower layers of the ocean warmer than they would be without such an effect.

All that having been said, let's take another look at the Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) argument, first noting the following: The proponents of AGW argue that, right from the beginning of the Industrial Revolution when there were no automobiles, very few steam engines, and only 1.2 billion people (versus today's 7 billion), the introduction of initially tiny quantities of a weak greenhouse gas produced, without time - delay, an in - phase and measurable rise in global temperatures that continues to this day.

As we note elsewhere, the structured assessment process we describe does not have the formality of a pre-ordained structure, but without doubt «orientation» — its first step — should never be omitted or skipped through as if it simply were a polite and warm introduction.