The report, Energy Revolution: A Sustainable World Energy Outlook, provided a «roadmap» for meeting future energy needs
without fuelling climate change, said Sven Teske from Greenpeace International.
Not exact matches
Scientists have shown that most existing fossil
fuel reserves can not be burned
without causing dangerous
climate change.
Cox also speculated whether Steyer prodded Schneiderman to launch the Exxon probe, which seeks to determine if the oil behemoth violated consumer - protection laws by selling fossil
fuels without disclosing its effect on
climate change.
«We live in an era during which it has become clear that we can not burn all of the fossil
fuels without causing dangerous
climate change,» the letter, seen by Reuters, said.
At the same time, the 1.3 billion people
without access to electricity and the 3 billion or so who still rely on burning wood or dung to
fuel cooking or heating would need modern energy supplies, although this might prove to have minimal impacts on
climate change through saving forests and other side effects.
The most important point is that fossil
fuel costs will continue to grow in the years to come, with or
without climate change legislation.
Artificial photosynthesis offers the promise of producing liquid
fuels that are renewable and can be used
without exacerbating global
climate change.
Without our use of fossil
fuels, we should be descending into another glacial maximum — albeit slowly, over tens of thousands of years (the pace of natural global
climate change in the Pleistocene).
you seem to refer to two very different problems: the possible fading of the industrial society because we don't have a good alternative to fossil
fuels (which would happen even
without GH effect), and the threat of a
climate change (which could happen even if we found an alternative to fossil
fuels, if there are in very large amount and we are too late to replace them).
Many believe the world won't be able to stop drastic
climate change without a technology for curbing emissions from the cheapest, most - carbon intensive
fuel.
Anna Roggenbuck, Policy Officer at CEE Bankwatch Network, said: «With the decision to finance TANAP, the EIB has shown its disregard to Europe's commitments to
climate change mitigation.This project has been approved
without a proper
climate impact assessment, and in contradiction to pledges under the Paris Agreement to keep global temperature rise to well below 2 degrees Celsius which entails limiting fossil
fuels consumption.»
«
Without urgent action, the expansion of logging operations and the spread of wildfires
fuelled by human - induced
climate change mean that tropical forests are likely to become increasingly degraded, conserving only a fraction of the breath - taking diversity they once harboured.»
The basic facts of
climate change are grim: 80 % of fossil
fuel reserves need to stay in the ground for us to stay below 2 °C * of warming and fossil
fuel companies aren't going to do that
without a fight.
Without the exaggerated alarm conjured from overly pessimistic
climate model projections of
climate change from carbon dioxide emissions, fossil
fuels — coal, oil, gas — would regain their image as the celebrated agents of prosperity that they are, rather than being labeled as pernicious agents of our destruction.
The Madhouse Effect also pinpoints where these denialist talking points often originate, detailing many of the fossil
fuel front groups whose representatives frequently mislead about
climate change in major print and TV media
without disclosing their glaring conflicts of interest.
The latest study is part of a wider shift in approach by urban planners and civic authorities to seek ways to mitigate the
climate change driven by ever more profligate consumption of fossil
fuels,
without actually adding to this consumption by installing ever more air conditioning plant.
Although overall crop harvests have increased in the face of greenhouse gas -
fueled warming, the study showed that
climate change has left wheat down 5.5 % and corn 4 %, compared to what would have happened
without global warming.
Energy and
Climate Change secretary Ed Davey says these proposals are «a radical shift» away from old policies of «tinkering at the edges»
without tackling
fuel poverty's root causes — homes that are too energy inefficient to be kept warm on a budget.
It must always be repeated that the clean energy revolution can't prevent catastrophic
climate change without far more aggressive government policies to speed the transition off fossil
fuels.
The commentary, published in the British scientific journal, Nature
Climate Change, estimated the impact of consuming the
fuel from oilsands deposits â $»
without factoring in greenhouse gas emissions associated with extraction and production â $» would be far less harmful to the planet's atmosphere than consuming all of the world's coal resources.
«In spite of these efforts, and in light of the hazards that are here and worsening, Plaintiffs are spending, and must continue to spend, millions of dollars to protect their property and residents from the impacts of
climate change... Despite receiving the warning that «fossil
fuel use should not be encouraged,» Defendants spent decades selling and promoting fossil
fuels without disclosing the dangers that continued fossil
fuel over-use posed.»
Without a functional democracy, there can be no federal role in responding to voter demand, not only for a clean energy economy that is less dependent on fossil
fuels, but also for clean air, water, large reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, and a robust federal
climate change science program.
Under the same grant the contrarian scientist also published two papers questioning whether
climate change was dangerous for polar bears and whether the Arctic was warming,
without disclosing the fossil
fuel companies that funded his work.
So even
without accounting for
climate change, in most cases fossil
fuels cost more than they're worth.