Sentences with phrase «without god or god»

You said, «again we have never been without god or God real or imagined.»

= > again we have never been without god or God real or imagined.

That, without a god or gods in their life, millions of Americans live moral wholesome lives.

Not exact matches

It was a way to appease the gods of outrage without really giving up power or influence.

God forbid your car breaks down, you lose your job or you have an expensive home repair... and without an emergency fund, you'll feel forced to take it out of your retirement account.

There are some agnostic theists, who are not sure about a god, but lean toward accepting one or another of them, but I think that the majority of agnostics live without belief and conduct their daily lives atheistically.

No God would make a world in such poor taste, scoffed Darwin, thinking of blind nature's waste, of creatures duplicate, ungainly, vile: too many mollusks, slime without soul or style.

However, basing the response to «where did God come from» to avoid the inherent premise that everything that exists must have a cause (with or without W.L. Craig's superfluous inclusion of «begins to exist») on the definitional fiat that «god always existed» is simply special pleadiGod come from» to avoid the inherent premise that everything that exists must have a cause (with or without W.L. Craig's superfluous inclusion of «begins to exist») on the definitional fiat that «god always existed» is simply special pleadigod always existed» is simply special pleading.

Believe in One God and there is no partner with him, No son or any creatures and Jesus was just a messanger sent to Children of Israel who was born thru virgin Marry and no father, this is another miracle of God that He can create a human without father as HE created Adam and Eve without parents... what if you found yourself in «wrong» by believing in multiple Gods?

God promises in His word, the Bible that no one will live without a chance to make the choice to acknowledge Him or reject Him.

Is it a stretch to believe that Christ went 40 days without food, fended off the devil, walked on water, etc., and not believe that a 14 year old boy saw God, found and translated an ancient text with seer stones, or that Catholics invoke stigmata?

As the existentialist writer Jean - Paul Sartre explained:» Without God all activities are equivalent... thus it amounts to the same thing whether one gets drunk alone, or is a leader of nations.»

Many people worship or have a knowledge of God without ever having seen or read a Bible.

I mean, a philosopher or scientist can talk about any of the things Christians talk bout without using the «wrapper» (transcendence, god, truth, love, etc.), which begs the question, why talk about these things through Christianity at all?

i do nt care if you do nt beleive in god or my religion, but one thing about my religion is it teaches respect, to whatever your beliefs are teaches ignorance thats the difference between me and you i care for others to were you only care about yourself without the reprecussions of the future

Religions incorporated and codified these basic social values and skills, and quickly learned to take credit for them — as if, without the religion, we would be doomed to not have them — although we see them in every human society, including hunter - gather tribes with no sense of gods as we understand them After many centuries of religious domination, enforced through pain of death, ostracization or other social sanctions, allowing religion to take credit, as well as failing to question other religious claims — has become a cultural habit.

Or perhaps it is true, one can not be moral without God.

To take part without being properly prepared (confessed sins, intention to walk in conformity with God's commandments is to damn yourself, much as taking medicine for which your body is not prepared could lead to further illness or death.

The majority of Americans actually think you can not be moral without the belief in a god or gods.

Without God, every attempt to call something true or beautiful or good is actually an attempt to compel other people to agree.

Without this evidencial support, any claim regarding knowledge of that gods» intentions, actions or desires is not valid and must be dismissed as fiction.

I agree about the talking about families, and learning about God from families (or relationships), BUT, I could never let someone go without at least mentioning Jesus and see their reaction.

Life can be fulfilling with or without God.

As Anton LaVey explained in his classic work The Satanic Bible, Man — using his brain — invented all the Gods, doing so because many of our species can not accept or control their personal egos, feeling compelled to conjure up one or a multiplicity of characters who can act without hindrance or guilt upon whims and desires.

«Healing hands of God have mercy on our unclean souls once again / Jesus Christ light of the world, burning bright within our hearts forever / Freedom means love without condition without a beginning or an end / Here's my heart, let it be forever yours.»

But there is perhaps a use we might make of the postmodern in apologetics, for the collapse of modernity may allow believers to speak once again about God without defensiveness or self - consciousness, may allow believers both to escape political categorization as liberal or conservative and to escape the modern view that sees political categories as fundamental.

The ability to enjoy God's good gift of sexuality without compromising one's education, life's work, or ability to put to use God's gifts and call is simply blessing.

But to my point that Atheism is a religion by definition Religion: a cause, principle, or system of beliefs held to with ardor and faith Faith: belief or trust: belief in, devotion to, or trust in somebody or something, especially without proof Atheism: unbelief in God or deities: disbelief in the existence of God or deities

You act like there is no such thing as love or compassion without a god behind it.

I think it should say For God so loved the world... that whosoever believeth in him OR THE CONCEPT... because too many convince themselves they believe in the man when convincing yourselves of that without the compassion, etc. part which is what it should encompass, is not truly understanding.

What a wonderfull time to be alive,,,,,,,,,, that we can see many of the prophecies unfold,,,,,, those that have no faith or belive in God and Christ can express their feellings... and do so without fear of retaliation....

It is quite likely that you rejected these other gods without ever looking into their religions or reading their books.

Always been and will always Why can't PPL get along and accept the fact that it's okay to believe in God or not, without all the nasty hostility??? BOTH SIDES....

Without any evidence for, or even so much as a rational argument in support of your god, or any other god for that matter, believing they exist is patently moronic.

People without any temporal horizons — without any historical purpose or vision of the future — grow enervated and decadent, and they begin to follow strange gods, who promise them meaning.

Now you may not be capable of living without them or living without a god but many others are.

Or maybe it was just more folly of men making up some rules the best they knew how without any inspiration from a god who would've known better?

You do comprehend that all Atheist means is without a belief in a god or gods, right??? I'm not the one claiming a god and given that you refuse to answer any questions, it is rather safe to say you're lying about all you claim.

... we can disagree without being divisive - yr entitled to yr understanding of correct theology that leads to faith - I'm more concerned with faith and the theology that will support it.It might appear that I just said the same thing in two ways, but I wd be quick to argue that theology shld be Faith's child.Most of us have our experience of God or Christ (including Paul) before we even know what theology is — correct or not.

We are born with love for people, but without any idea or need for a separate god.

Without these scriptural basis», my concepts regarding Fractal and Cellular and Celestial Cosmology would make little sense in regards to «intelligent beings or Gods» living upon the Cellular - like universes of all Life we know of.

Nietzsche was right, of course; without belief in God the public morality must, in the long run, finally collapse into either anarchy or tyranny - and most likely into tyranny following anarchy.

The only king of kings is the creator of everything between the heavens and the earth, the master of the day of judgement, the one who does not have parents, wife, or children, the one who does not get sick, forget, the one who forgives and punishes, and the one who creates life and take life away, the creator of Adam from the mud in the earth can create anything by just saying, «Be and it becomes», the Creator who gives live and takes life also created Jesus without needing the help of a man, and th owner of everything between the earth and heavens, is Allaah / God.

You know — demonstrate either your God or your direct connection to his «truths» without letting subjectivity taint the picture?

Moreover, such development requires a transcendent vision of the person, it needs God: without him, development is either denied, or entrusted exclusively to man, who falls into the trap of thinking he can bring about his own salvation, and ends up promoting a dehumanized form of development.

But without in any way glorifying suffering or pretending that it is not evil, Christians worship a God who wills to be with us in our dependence, teaching us «attentiveness before a good and nurturant God.»

For instance, a person who grows up without being indoctrinated in a religion or otherwise never exposed to the concept of a god would likely be an atheist because there would be no reason to have such a belief in that case.

In Christianity, for example, it's taught that people wouldn't do good things without belief in God, or that their good deeds are somehow «meaningless» without first believing in God.

Aristotle cogently argues that complete self - sufficiency is only for a wild beast or a god, referring perhaps in the first to Diogenes himself, and both he and Plato write of self - sufficiency without the seeming madness of a complete rejection of society.

The world is full of many complex things which occur naturally & without any aid or suggestions the supernatural being involved, the only reason you opt for the «god did it» excuse is b / c we do not have a comprehensive understanding on how life originated, but we do have many sound hypotheses.