Sentences with phrase «without home court»

I still think the Cavs will get the 3rd seed and we'll get Philadelphia in the 1st without home court advantage.

Not exact matches

Maybe to say «that is a good question but I cant give you a satisfactory answer» maybe put the ball back into his / her court by offerring an invitation to the Alpha course or to come along to a small Bible study group st your home or an invitation to a non Church tyoe activity with other Christians, walk, bike ride, five a side football or other sporting things, befriend them and truly love them without an agenda.

We also oppose provisions of the bill that expand the immigration detention system and erode the basic rights afforded to immigrants, including the provisions that allow for the indefinite detention of individuals who can not be deported to their home countries; that expedite removal proceedings or automatically imprison immigrants without providing them access to attorneys or judges; that increase detention capacity by an additional 20,000 beds to house immigrants awaiting their day in court; and that diminish the checks and balances of judicial review over immigration decisions.

They might lose home - court advantage in the first round, but anything below the sixth seed seems too low for this team, even without Horford.

In 1974, N.C. State won the national championship without ever having to leave the red Carolina clay, and it was in the wake of that situation that the rule against teams» playing on their home courts in regionals was enacted.

Donald Trump Jr. reported for jury duty yesterday in Manhattan Supreme Court, turning heads and generating a buzz — but went home without getting picked for a case.

The Home Office behaved like a tin - pot dictatorship: detaining innocent people, accusing them of made - up charges without providing anything to back it up, denying them their day in court and then deporting them.

According to a Hollywood Reporter report, Liman and Cruise have made a «last ditch effort» to court Nicholson, with the pair visiting Nicholson's home last week and Cruise telling his «Few Good Men» costar that «he won't do the movie without him.»

Lenders can repossess the collateral (your home, boat, or car) if you default, without going to court first.

If you have left your home voluntarily, your lender might be able to take over the house and sell it without going to court first.

You can not be evicted from your home without a court order.

March 2017 update: Affidavit submitted to court by former employee details how PETA lies to acquire animals to kill, steals pets from homes, kills highly adoptable animals such as puppies and kittens without ever trying to find them homes, and kills feral cats using cruel methods: nathanwinograd.com/?p=1727 2

Their fabulous beach and bush position is fringed by surf beaches, pristine waterways and natural bushland and, if you do need more, they are only 15 minutes from Noosa's iconic Hastings Street and even less to Gympie Terrace on the beautiful Noosa River where you can experience restaurants, fine dining and boutique shopping.Their eco friendly homes offer spacious beautifully appointed accommodation, sleeping up to 10 people, and are perfect for groups of families or friends who wish to relax, reconnect and enjoy fine food and wine in a natural Australian bush setting but without sacrificing luxury.Imagine wakening up to the sound of kookaburra and butcher bird song, seeing the kangaroos playing around your home or spotting an iguana strolling across the road.Enjoy their Leisure Centre with a choice of pools including a heated spa and children's pool, media room, pool / games room, children's play room and tennis court with night lighting, all situated amidst a backdrop of natural bushscape.

He had also moved his home and business in the fall of 2010, without notifying the New York Office of Court Administration.

Her injuries were severe and she was unable to return to the former matrimonial home, because of its memories; though H refused to allow it to be sold or let without a court order.

Though I agree with many of O'Keefe's points (and invite discussion below), I can't close this post without noting that many of the Legal Blogwatch Affiliate Blogs are included on the ABA's list, including my home blog, MyShingle, my colleague Bob Ambrogi's Law Sites, Craig Williams» May It Please the Court, Bruce Macewen's Adam Smith, Esq., Counsel to Counsel, How Appealing, Blog of the Legal Times and Larry Bodine's Law Marketing Blog.

At a highly emotional and stressful time, when your children, home, property, and future income may be on the line, you should not have to argue your own case in court, prepare your own legal arguments, or settle your matter without legal advice.

We have all the tools and gadgets necessary to practice the law from our own homes, without ever even having to physically meet a client or go to court.

The police can not force your abuser to leave the home without a court order, if he or she has the legal right to be there.

Furthermore, if the court suspects that your child will be stressed out by moving frequently between two homes, it might shut down your shared custody agreement without your input anyway.

Therefore, a parent should not take their child from the home without consent of the other parent or a court order authorizing them to do so.

Our Albuquerque nursing home abuse lawyers are able to resolve the majority of cases without prolonged litigation, but we have established ourselves as trial attorneys who are always prepared to go to court if a fair agreement can not be reached.

Some Standard Bail Conditions: ~ Report to a peace officer ~ Physically remain within a specified geographic area ~ Notify a peace officer of any change to your address or employment ~ Abstain from communicating directly or indirectly with any complainant, witness or co-accused ~ Not possess any prohibited or restricted weapons ~ Not possess any drugs without a valid prescription ~ To maintain a curfew or remain within your home often referred to as being on «house arrest» ~ It is critical that you do not break any conditions that are imposed upon you by the court.

Both of the husband's arguments were rejected, with the court noting that OCL reports do not bind trial judges, and that the trial judge was correct in noting that the court could not make an order affecting the wife's mother's interest in the matrimonial home without the wife's mother being a party to the proceeding.

Some of my cases going to a judgment in the last few years were: Click to open judgment in fresh window (Scottish Courts site) Insurance implications of playing «Happy Birthday» on the piano Damages for psychiatric illness caused by bereavement Judicial approval of the Hohfeldian analysis of rights Leading case on fair rent assessment Title raiders and retrospective rectification Leading case on competency of hearsay evidence Detention ordered by children's hearing: Articles 5 and 6 of ECHR No damage suffered by making a smaller profit than expected «In a well - regulated legal universe black holes should not exist» How much is half a home worth, with or without a mortgage «Reasonably obtained» held not to include unethically obtained Leading case on children's hearing system and ECHR Attempt to judicially review SNP; petitioners held not to exist Unlawful for council to charge for property enquiries Fair sharing (100 % to nil) of matrimonial property

The Supreme Court dealt with this conflict of public policy v fairness point without getting a nosebleed in Tariq v Home Office [2011] UKSC 35, [2011] All ER (D) 108 (Jul).

Nowadays, for B.C. counsel, it takes an arbitration conducted without examinations for discovery and with limited document discovery and flexible provisions for expert evidence to bring home the fact that a trial can be conducted perfectly well without all the bells and whistles we have added by our rules of court.

In determining the amount and duration of maintenance the court shall consider: (A) the income and property of the respective parties including marital property distributed pursuant to subdivision five of this part; (B) the duration of the marriage and the age and health of both parties; (C) the present and future earning capacity of both parties; (D) the ability of the party seeking maintenance to become self - supporting and, if applicable, the period of time and training necessary therefor; (E) reduced or lost lifetime earning capacity of the party seeking maintenance as a result of having foregone or delayed education, training, employment, or career opportunities during the marriage; (F) the presence of children of the marriage in the respective homes of the parties; (G) the tax consequences to each party; (H) contributions and services of the party seeking maintenance as a spouse, parent, wage earner and homemaker, and to the career or career potential of the other party; (I) the wasteful dissipation of marital property by either spouse; (J) any transfer or encumbrance made in contemplation of a matrimonial action without fair consideration; and (K) any other factor which the court shall expressly find to be just and proper.

As a result, the Court permitted the Client to serve her sentence at home so that she could continue to work and turn her life around WITHOUT having to go to jail.

Kathleen Walker Shaw, GMB Europe Officer, said «GMB welcomes today's judgment by the Court of Justice of the European Union as important confirmation that the journeys made by workers without fixed or habitual place of work between their homes and the first and last customer of the day constitute working time.

GMB, the union for British Gas, AA, meter readers and home care workers, welcome the judgement by the European Court that journeys made by workers without fixed or habitual place of work between their homes and the first and last customer of the day constitute working time.

It is tempting to point the finger at judges of the European Court of Human Rights who, in a triplet of cases against the UK government since 2004 (Connors v UK (2004) 40 EHRR 189, McCann v UK (2008) 47 EHRR 913 and Kay v UK [2010] ECHR 1322), have decided that evictions without a consideration of proportionality by the courts would breach a person's Art 8 rights to respect for private and family life and home.

(1.3) A child shall be taken into temporary custody by a law enforcement officer without order of the court when there are reasonable grounds to believe the child has run away from the child's parents, guardian, or legal custodian and the child's parents, guardian, or legal custodian has made a report to a law enforcement agency that the child has run away from home.

The Second District Court of Appeal in Los Angeles granted a rehearing Tuesday at the request of a couple who have taught their eight children at home without credentials.»

With our court specific approved defensive driving program, you are able to do everything from home without having to worry about fitting a class into someone else's schedule.

You winning your court case without having to leave the comfort of your home?

But if uninformed courts approve the unregulated use of Stingrays, they are essentially allowing the government to enter into the home via a cellular signal at law enforcement's discretion and rummage at will without any supervision.

The foundation of the Collaborative approach is to help you and your spouse find solutions to your disputes — child custody, the amount of spousal support or who gets the family home, for example — without going to court.

Automatic restraining orders in many jurisdictions prohibit either spouse from selling or mortgaging the marital home during the divorce even if the property is only in one name, so the other spouse may not be allowed to sell or encumber the property without the other spouse's consent or court approval.

If you and your spouse simply move into separate homes and live that way for years, without an agreement or court order governing the situation, Michigan law requires that the judge determine whether you were actually separated during this time.

Many of these factors emphasize stability in your child's life — courts don't want to pluck a child from one home and move him to another without very good cause.

If your child is taken from their home country without your permission, or without the authorisation of a court, then the Hague Convention may apply.

Courts are generally reluctant to allow a party to remain indefinitely in the marital home without the remaining party refinancing the debt.

However, I will say that at home, when I have the occasional constituent come to talk to me about divorce law and family law problems, without exception, the problems have been fathers feeling that they are not getting fair representation through the courts and that the whole system is stacked against fathers having access to their children.

Michigan law provides that a parent who is subject to a joint child custody arrangement may not move more than 100 miles from his or her current home without the consent of the other parent or the approval of the court.

So far from these topics being off - limits, any MHP seeking appointment in a court case needs to fully inform the parties prior to their consent [123], of information about the following kinds of potentials for bias and agenda: whether the MHP has been married or divorced, and how many times, and under what kinds of circumstances, and how the MHP currently feels about those events; whether, if divorced, the MHP went through litigation over custody or property, and such details as whether the MHP had problems paying or receiving child support, as well as the custody arrangements of the MHP's own children and how these worked out and everyone's feelings about them; the MHP's own personal experience taking care of and spending time with children, within and without the scope of «parenting», and with regard to parenting, whether that was parenting as a primary caregiver, married or single parent, with or without household and third party help, or as a working parent or stay - home parent, and for how many children, and for how long, and the outcomes from all of that; i.e. how much time has this person actually spent caring for children on his or her own, and how well did this person's own family systems function, and is this person in fact an «expert» in creating a functioning family and raising happy, healthy, successful children with good outcomes, nay «best» outcomes, thoroughly well - adjusted and having reached the very pinnacles of their innate potential.

Therefore, a parent should not take their child from the home without consent of the other parent or a court order authorizing them to do so.

The appeals court upheld the dismissal because the mortgage company had made no representations to the brokerage that the buyers were qualified to obtain the necessary financing without selling their existing home.

After a review the court determined that the buyers had been advised that there had been construction done to the premises without a permit and that the buyers should consider a home inspection.

The court was satisfied that had he been meaningfully alerted to the existence and extent of the sloping kitchen floor in advance, Randy would not have waived the home inspection condition in the agreement, at least not without an adjustment to the purchase price to reflect the cost to rectify the problem.