Not exact matches
Improvements in efficiency play a huge role
in taking the strain off the supply side:
without them, the projected rise
in final
energy use would more than double.
They both have tried to design scenarios that satisfy all future demand for
energy solely through industrial production, technological
improvements,
efficiency, and markets,
without any strict regulatory limits on the total quantity of
energy consumed
in production and consumption.
As a result,
without effective mitigation, total
energy - related carbon dioxide emissions (including transformations, own use and losses) will rise from 26.1 GtCO2 (7.2 GtC)
in 2004 to around 37 — 40 GtCO2 (11.1 GtC)
in 2030 (IEA, 2006b; Price and de la Rue du Can, 2006), possibly even higher (Fisher, 2006), assuming modest
energy -
efficiency improvements are made to technologies currently
in use.
No one has shown that implementation of low carbon technologies and
energy efficiency improvement technologies can rescue us from the climate Apocalypse;
in fact, Kevin Anderson has done the computations for a 50/50 chance of staying within 2 C, and has shown that transition to low carbon technologies can't do the job
without some serious additional fossil demand reduction.