Sentences with phrase «without judge and jury»

Most of the actual heresy trials, without judge and jury, were about matters of personal morals.

Not exact matches

But it's also worth considering that an employer who fires an employee simply based on the wrongdoing itself is effectively imposing a penalty — acting like judge, jury, and executioner — without any of the due - process protections that accompany a criminal trial.

When we connect this with well known facts that West armed «rebels» with links with Al Qaeda, and that West wants to be judge, jury and executioner without even trying to prove what happened if anything happened at all, it becomes clear who created this whole mess and who constantly pushes whole world towards WW3 and nuclear Armageddon.

Forty - eight hours before the trial started, without any advance notice to Judge Fiorella or Officer Hassett, and without providing Officer Hassett the opportunity to testify before the grand jury, the District Attorney's Office obtained an indictment on the same exact misdemeanor charges.»

Inspection teams lack expertise in the subject / age range they inspect; are unreliable in their inspection judgements; and are unaccountable — without external validation, Ofsted is its own judge and jury when it comes to quality control of its operations.

, ArtPharmacy (Blog), June 12 Elisa della Barba, «What I loved about Venice Biennale 2013», Swide, June 2 Juliette Soulez, «Le Future Generation Art Prize remis a Venise», Blouin Artinfo, May 31 Charlotte Higgins, «Venice Biennale Diary: dancing strippers and inflatable targets», The Guardian On Culture Blog, May 31 Vincenzo Latronico, «Il Palazzo Enciclopedico», Art Agenda, May 31 Marcus Field, «The Venice Biennale preview: Let the art games commence», The Independent, May 18 Joost Vandebrug, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», L'Uomo Vogue, No. 441, May / June «Lucy Mayes, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», a Ruskin Magazine, Vol.3, pp. 38 - 39 Rebecca Jagoe, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye: Portraits Without a Subject», The Culture Trip, May Lynette Yiadom - Boakye, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye on Walter Richard Sickert's Miss Gwen Ffrangcon - Davies as Isabella of France (1932)», Tate etc., Issue 28, Summer, p. 83 «Turner Prize - nominated Brit has art at Utah museum», Standard Examiner, May 1 Matilda Battersby, «Imaginary portrait painter Lynette Yiadom - Boakye becomes first black woman shortlisted for Turner Prize 2013», The Independent, April 25 Nick Clark, «David Shrigley's fine line between art and fun nominated for Turner Prize», The Independent, April 25 Charlotte Higgins, «Turner prize 2013: a shortlist strong on wit and charm», guardian.co.uk April 25 Charlotte Higgins, «Turner prize 2013 shortlist takes a mischievous turn», guardian.co.uk, April 25 Adrian Searle, «Turner prize 2013 shortlist: Tino Sehgal dances to the fore», guardian.co.uk, April 25 Allan Kozinn, «Four Artists Named as Finalists for Britain's Turner Prize», The New York Times, April 25 Coline Milliard, «A Crop of Many Firsts: 2013 Turner Prize Shortlist Announced», Artinfo, April 25 Sam Phillips, «Former RA Schools student nominated for Turner Prize», RA Blog, April 25 «Turner Prize Shortlist 2013», artlyst, April 25 «Turner Prize Nominations Announced: David Shrigley, Tino Sehgal, Lynette Yiadom - Boakye and Laure Prouvost Up For Award», Huffpost Arts & Culture, April 25 Hannah Furness, «Turner Prize 2013: a dead dog, headless drummers and the first «live encounter» entry», Telegraph, April 25 Hannah Furness, «Turner Prize 2013: The public will question whether this is art, judge admits», Telegraph, April 25 Julia Halperin, «Turner Prize shortlist announced», The Art Newspaper, April 25 Brian Ferguson, «Turner Prize nomination for David Shrigley», Scotsman.com, April 25 «Former Falmouth University student shortlisted for Turner Prize», The Cornishman, April 29 «Trickfilme und der Geschmack der Sonne», Spiegel Online, April 25 Dominique Poiret, «La Francaise Laure Prouvost en lice pour le Turner Prize», Liberation, April 26 Louise Jury, «Turner Prize: black humour artist David Shrigley is finally taken seriously by judges», London Evening Standard, April 25 «Turner Prize 2013: See nominees» work including dead dog, grave shopping list and even some paintings», Mirror, April 25 Henry Muttisse, «It's the Turner demise», The Sun, April 25 «Imaginary portrait painter up for Turner Prize», BBC News, April 25 Farah Nayeri, «Tate's Crowd Artist Sehgal Shortlisted for Turner Prize», Bloomberg Businessweek, April 25 «Turner Prize finalists mix humour and whimsy», CBC News, April 25 Richard Moss, «Turner Prize 2013 shortlist revealed for Derry - Londonderry», Culture24, April 25 «David Shrigley makes 2013 Turner Prize shortlist», Design Week, April 25 «The Future Generation Art Prize@Venice 2013», e-flux.com, April 21 Skye Sherwin, «Lynette Yiadom - Boakye», The Guardian Guide, March 2 - 8, p. 36 Amie Tullius, «Seasoned by Whitney Tassie», 15 Bytes, March «ARTINFO UK's Top 3 Exhibitions Opening This Week, ARTINFO.com, February 25 Orlando Reade, «Whose Oyster Is This World?»

A case needs to be tried and appealed in a Trial Court (both sides present case to a judge and jury) and Appellate Court (court reviews case without new testimony and there is no jury) before it can be presented and challenged in the Supreme Court.

For Judge Arthur Cooperman, who's hearing the case without a jury, to convict on the top counts of first - and second - degree manslaughter, he'd have to believe «that they planned it and they all had the same mind - set,» says veteran defense attorney Marvyn Kornberg.

Some of the things a judge or jury will look at to determine whether the product was «unreasonably dangerous» are whether the utility of the product outweighed the danger, whether it could have been made safer without undermining the utility, and whether a safer design was feasible.

That means we are asking the Judge — without a jury — to rule that the evidence so clearly shows the defendant was negligent that the Judge — without even giving the case to the jury to consider — should rule that the defendant was negligent and is liable to our client, the plaintiff.

Considering the disadvantages of arbitration, its changing nature, and changes in the pool of available arbitrators, employers should consider another alternative; having agreements with their employees that all legal disputes will be submitted to court, but only before a judge without a jury (a «bench trial»).

You were in court listening to a judge trying to explain some principle of law to a jury, without using the words or phrases «trust me», «it's magic», «think of it like religion, you don't have to understand, just accept and believe» or «abracadbra»?

In Wilson v Her Majesty's Advocate 2009 JC 336, which also concerned opinion evidence, the High Court of Justiciary, in an opinion delivered by Lord Wheatley, stated the test thus (at para 58): «[T] he subject - matter under discussion must be necessary for the proper resolution of the dispute, and be such that a judge or jury without instruction or advice in the particular area of knowledge or experience would be unable to reach a sound conclusion without the help of a witness who had such specialised knowledge or experience.»

«Anti-pardons» are also in the news thanks to the great state of Alabama, the lone state in the union that permits judges to overturn jury - mandated «life without parole» sentences and impose the death penalty instead, something judges have seen fit to do 95 times.

Unfortunately, although a jury might often present a higher chance of acquittal than the judge - trial option, if the jury convicts, it will recommend the sentence without the benefit of knowing the voluntary sentencing guidelines, reading a presentence report, nor being permitted to recommend a suspended sentence, a probation period, nor community service nor counseling in place of active jail and a recommended fine amount.

So construed question of law would include (without attempting anything like an exhaustive definition which would be impossible) questions touching the scope, effect or application of a rule of law which the courts apply in determining the rights of parties; and by long usage, the term question of law has come to be applied to questions which, when arising at a trial by a judge and jury, would fall exclusively to the judge for determination.»

Once the lawyers have fought over the instructions and the judge decides what will be presented, the jury only gets them in writing... in some states not even in writing, they only get them read to them without a copy to take back to the room.

The American criminal justice system is far from being sufficiently enlightened, starting by too many presumed - innocent people caged without bond pending sentencing, moving to Virginia's crabbed criminal discovery system, continuing to Virginia's system that allows prosecutors to scare defendants to plead guilty by their refusal to waive a jury that in many instances and locations can mean more racist jurors than judges on top of the jurors often being more wild cards than judges for sentencing, continuing to the many judges who choose judicial efficiency over a fair trial, continuing to the brutal capital punishment system, cntinuing to excessive mandatory minimum and guideline sentencing, and continuing to the slew of innocent convicted people (many of whom plead gulilty rather than risking a worse fate), and continuing to frequently excessive sentences and excessive probation violation sentences.

In all cases of criminal contempt arising under the provisions of this act, the accused, upon conviction, shall be punished by fine or imprisonment or both; Provided however, that in case the accused is a natural person the fine to be paid shall not exceed the sum of $ 1,000, nor shall impriSonment exceed the term of six months; Provided further, That in any such proceeding for criminal contempt, at the discretion of the judge, the accused may be tried with or without a jury; Provided further, however, That in the event such proceeding for criminal contempt be tried before a judge without a jury and the sentence of the court on conviction is a fine in excess of the sum of $ 300 or imprisonment in excess of forty five days, the accused in said proceeding upon demand therefor, shall be entitled to a trial de novo before a jury, which shall conform as near as may be to the practice in other criminal cases.

Indeed, the greatest and most effective form of «patent reform» might simply be to knock these self - impressed patent litigators and Federal Circuit judges off their pedestals, recognize patent law as simply just another area of law in general, and present the issues to a jury without delay, followed by a review, if appropriate, in the appropriate Circuit Court of Appeals.

To the extent the trial judge authorized the jury to award respondent a recovery without regard to evidence that the asserted implication of the column was made specifically of and concerning him, we hold that the instruction was erroneous.

First, references to «[t] he court» in § 3553 (a)(1)-- which requires «[t] he court» when sentencing to consider «the nature and circumstances of the offense and the history and characteristics of the defendant» — and references to «the judge» in the Act's history must be read in context to mean «the judge without the jury,» not «the judge working together with the jury.»

Without expressly ruling on petitioner's request for a hearing, the trial judge denied the motion, and the jury ultimately convicted petitioner.

In a hearing or trial without a jury, the successor judge shall at the request of a party recall any witness whose testimony is material and disputed and who is available to testify again without undue burden.

JUDGE ALONE Regrettably, actions against the municipality8 and the Province9 have to be tried without a jury.

And it was required, in cases where the grand jury in attendance upon any of these courts should terminate its session without proceeding by indictment or otherwise against any prisoner named in the list, that the judge of the court should forthwith make an order that such prisoner, desiring a discharge, should be brought before him or the court to be discharged, on entering into recognizance, if required, to keep the peace and for good behavior, or to appear, as the court might direct, to be further dealt with according to lAnd it was required, in cases where the grand jury in attendance upon any of these courts should terminate its session without proceeding by indictment or otherwise against any prisoner named in the list, that the judge of the court should forthwith make an order that such prisoner, desiring a discharge, should be brought before him or the court to be discharged, on entering into recognizance, if required, to keep the peace and for good behavior, or to appear, as the court might direct, to be further dealt with according to land for good behavior, or to appear, as the court might direct, to be further dealt with according to law.

When applicable rules allow enhancement based on any and all jury - rejected «facts,» prosecutors can brazenly charge any and all offenses for which there is a sliver of evidence, and pursue those charges throughout trial without fear of any consequences when seeking later to make out their case to a sentencing judge.

In yet another significant New York personal injury lawsuit, an appeals court has modified downward a jury's pain and suffering verdict with no explanation why, leaving the public clueless, judges and attorneys without guidance as to how to evaluate future cases and the plaintiff with $ 1,325,000 less than the jury awarded him.

In layperson's terms, this means that the judge finds there is no real issue of fact or law and rules in favor of the carrier without the case ever going before a jury.

The effective mediator will also help parties consider the risks and costs of resolving a dispute before a judge or jury, without necessarily meeting the expectations of either party.

After moving to Illinois, I began mediating cases and discovered that I truly enjoyed the mediation process itself and helping people resolve their disputes without a judge or jury telling them what to do.