Sentences with phrase «without knowing a thing»

There's what's called a «secondary market» in MBSs, and it's quite possible your mortgage will be bought and sold multiple times — without your knowing a thing about it.

You talk pretty cavalierly about my health, without knowing a thing about my health history.

After one decidedly teasing teaser, it's tempting to just forswear any further trailers and go into Blade Runner 2049 without knowing another thing about it until the movie arrives.

You can easily get through the whole story without knowing a thing about skill charms or weapon affinity.

Readers take chances on new authors, without knowing a thing about us.

Besides, Egypt is one of the oldest continuous civilizations in the world, and you don't last that long without knowing a thing or two about taking care of offspring.

However, you must now write one without knowing a thing or two about pharmacist's cover letter.

Not exact matches

«I left knowing without a doubt that what [Snowden] did, he did because he believed it was the right thing to do.

«Anyone who knows how things are in the company finds it hard to imagine that all that happened without Piëch,» he told the press.

One thing to know: The Super Bowl is being held in US Bank Stadium this season, meaning it's possible that the Vikings could play all the way through the title game without leaving Minneapolis.

There's tons of advice out there offering strategies to help you say no without offending others and tips on what sort of things you need to starting refusing to do right now.

It has often been said that «nothing good in life comes easy», and it's the sculpted attitude of the hero - entrepreneur alone that knows there's no such thing as a reward without a risk.

«The one thing I wish my younger self knew was how to find a balance between acting smart and expressing achievements without hesitation.

I look at myself in the past, who would say yes to things without knowing I couldn't deliver and then give up, as flaky and unreliable.

But you know as far as the actual participation I think it's something that... It's historically relevant because history has never been without it but it's one of those things that should be done with a lot of thought if it needs to be done.

Mention it to veteran entrepreneurs, however, and they know immediately what you mean — the way parents understand things their friends without kids can't.

Holding the conversation privately and holding it without the person's co-workers knowing are too separate things, but if you exercise discretion and communicate via e-mail that you need to speak with the employee, you can keep the situation under wraps.

Entrepreneurs have to make so many choices that it's easy to stagnate by doing a lot of little things without proving or learning anything — what is known as decision paralysis.

The next thing you know you're rolling something out without nearly enough context.

«And we've done it with passion, and we've done it without impacting our customers» rates, and we've done it knowing it's the right thing to do.»

Without the things that defy logic you would never come to know so deeply what you stand for, what you value or how powerful you truly are.

As more things become connected, attacks will range from a hacker taking pictures of Miss Teen USA on her webcam without her knowing to the significant attack on control systems of factories.»

One thing we know for sure: without bold policy actions, the world could slip into years of slow, sub-par and jobless growth.

But to be fully present at work, to feel «psychologically safe,» we must know that we can be free enough, sometimes, to share the things that scare us without fear of recriminations.

GREENBLATT: Well you know I taught at Columbia as I mentioned for the last 22 years and so I tell my students that first day of class actually, I tell them that you know I don't think there's a lot of social value in being an investment manager, it's not that I don't think investors who do work set help set prices and allocate capital and all those things, but I just think A, they're not very good at it, and B, it'll get done without you.

There's no way for us to accurately create a plan without knowing who you are, how you do things, what you've done, and what type of results you're currently seeing.

Also known as 401 (k) business financing, this method allowed the two to use their retirement funds to start a business — without incurring tax penalties or getting a loan — and things moved quickly from there.

Wealthsimple, as you know, is a service that helps you become a financial genius (without having to read quarterly reports and keep track of the global supply of lithium or things like that).

I've known a number of successful individuals who achieved great things without ever setting goals.

If I'm wrong about those things, my investment results could really start to deteriorate, because I'm buying something I know has market power but then the company is taking the free cash flow and allocating all of it to something without market power.

Thing is a virgin birth has never been known occur in a mammal acccording to science, and if it did the offspring would be a clone of the mother without the physical DNA normally contributed by the male donor.

Which things being without number in our mind itself, (the nature of which mind is incapable of being seen,) not to mention others, the very faith whereby we believe, or the thought whereby we know that we either believe any thing, or believe not, being as it is altogether alien from the sight of those eyes; what so naked, so clear, what so certain is there to the inner eyes of our minds?

Blind faith is used as a caution By one that knows when teaching the ignorant about such things as fire for example, when the student comprehends feeling heat, they learn without burning themselves.

One can marvel over the beauty of nature and the unknown and one can express love and compassion without arrogantly asserting that we know things we couldn't possibly know.

One thing seems certain to me: The good in the Age of Enlightenment can no longer endure without the Light of the Ages.

... we can disagree without being divisive - yr entitled to yr understanding of correct theology that leads to faith - I'm more concerned with faith and the theology that will support it.It might appear that I just said the same thing in two ways, but I wd be quick to argue that theology shld be Faith's child.Most of us have our experience of God or Christ (including Paul) before we even know what theology is — correct or not.

My kids go without many things and they know what a want versus a need is.

20 For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse: 21 because that, knowing God, they glorified him not as God, neither gave thanks; but became vain in their reasonings, and their senseless heart was darkened.22 Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools, 23 and changed the glory of the incorruptible God for the likeness of an image of corruptible man, and of birds, and four - footed beasts, and creeping things.24 Wherefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts unto uncleanness, that their bodies should be dishonored among themselves: 25 for that they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed for ever.

26 For this cause God gave them up unto vile passions: for their women changed the natural use into that which is against nature: 27 and likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men with men working unseemliness, and receiving in themselves that recompense of their error which was due.28 And even as they refused to have God in their knowledge, God gave them up unto a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not fitting; 29 being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, maliciousness; full of envy, murder, strife, deceit, malignity; whisperers, 30 backbiters, hateful to God, insolent, haughty, boastful, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents, 31 without understanding, covenant - breakers, without natural affection, unmerciful: 32 who, knowing the ordinance of God, that they that practise such things are worthy of death, not only do the same, but also consent with them that practise them.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

It is a dangerous thing to come to a conclusion without knowing the facts.

the proof i will require... (i.e. nothing on taking things without proof; better known as faith) 1 KINGS VERSE 30 - 40

But what is giving alms without anyone knowing, if it is not saying one thing and doing another?

Before you had Christ you were a sinner no matter what good or bad thing you did, well we have to believe now that we are born again that we are righteous, holy, and without fault and without sin in his eyes.

In the graciousness of the book (something often lacking when people engage Emergent, no names but...), in its passionate for the Scriptures, in its understanding that true faith shows itself in love, in its acceptance of the many things postmodernism has going for it without capitulating to todays culture, and especially in the willingness to both take on and unite both sides, Wittmer has written something here to be commended for, and something that all believers no matter what side they lean toward would do well to read.

«We receive all these books, and these only, as holy and confirmation of our faith; believing, without any doubt, all things contained in them, no so much because the church receives and approves them as such, but more especially because the Holy Ghost witnessed in our hearts that they are from God, whereof they carry the evidence in themselves.»

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

My education is fine... Nothing is wrong with my writing sense you were able to simply reply... Look how far this country has fallen without God... We took God out of schools and now school shootings are a common thing... I mean your insults are flattering because all it tells me is that deep down you know I am right but don't want to admit it..

The nice thing about online forums like this one is that they let us know that we are not alone and they give us the chance to work through some of our new ideas without jeopardizing those «real life» relationships that are too fragile to handle brutal honesty.

Or is the human race an infallible one so that any idea can be, move over should be, taken on faith of its truth no matter the reality of things and then acted on without concern of the real truth which was «WILLFULLY» overlooked?