Sentences with phrase «without knowing the answer»

Once trained, a neural network can then be tested without knowing the answer.

In teaching, the student may know a standard of learning, without knowing the answer to a rest question bc it isn't tested in the same way it was taught.

And that's not a good thing because it's impossible to judge the success of a strategy without knowing the answers to those questions.

Without knowing the answers ahead of time, any medical care can be scary; something as invasive as bladder stone surgery for a best friend can be downright terrifying.

You never ask a question without knowing the answer but here goes: Have you done anything recently about anything?

How can a lawyer establish a credible reputation without actually knowing the area of law, without knowing the answers?

Without knowing the answer to this question will have you spinning your wheels.

Not exact matches

If your answer is No, then this blog post is a must read for you as it will help you in understanding how to use Google Docs without any -LSB-...]

Going into a meeting without first letting people know about its scope will only result in sub-optimized decisions and endless questions that should've been answered beforehand.

But for couch potato gamblers who prefer to place bets without venturing to the track or casino and without having to actually know how to gamble, Market Vectors Gaming ETF may be the answer.

«I hope the Tesla fans know how to swim, because without the answers to the tough questions, it looks like Musk is leading them straight into the water.»

The short answer is no, but this is a complex issue without any short answers.

If your answer is No, then this blog post is a must read for you as it will help you in understanding how to use Google Docs without any hassles.

«The boring questions can also be categorized as the tough ones,» said Dave Sullivan, an analyst at AutoPacific Inc. «I hope the Tesla fans know how to swim, because without the answers to the tough questions, it looks like Musk is leading them straight into the water.»

Hence putting forth any answer without evidence, including «god», rather than saying «we don't know» is pretty intellectually dishonest.

I don't think I will have that answer in this lifetime, but I do know without a shadow of a doubt... that this tragic lie has hurt more than it has helped by a million to one.

What intelligent design theorists say over and over again, filling DVDs and lectures and pamphlets, is that it is impossible to get the solution to a complex problem without already knowing the answer.

Just answer without any of those evasions and artful tricks employed by theologians: Yes or No?

Since the answer to all of that is NO, your hypocrisy accusation is without evidence.

I am looking for authenticity, relevancy, no ovewhelming bands that take away from the experience of worship, clergy who are willing to answer my hard questions, who understand doubt is a stepping stone to deepening my belief, who accept everyone as Jesus did (and we know Jesus was a rebel who accepted and led all sorts of people), who don't feel the need to try to be hip, who speak about things without inserting politics, who are wiling to trash the temple to bring us back to the truth, who will step out of the box of comfort and be real.

Humans have been lied to and misled about divinity, faith and God for so long, they would not know the truth if it reached up and bit them on the proverbial cheeks.Deception has been a part of the history of mankind from day one.Further changes to the Bible only indicates it is still as strong as ever.The New Testament without Christ is like a riddle without an answer.

I don't know what the answer is but I do not think I will ever enter a church again without wearing sunglasses and giving a false name

While I definitely agree that his response is great in many circumstances and (without knowing the context of that conversation) may have been the perfect thing to say at that moment, I think calling this statement «a template that can be used to respond to questions concerning sexuality, gender and other important issues» reduces a very complex issue down to a very simple response that doesn't really answer any questions for anyone.

what is very interesting to me tonite is the folks who are positive there is no god... what is equally interesting is the snarling that appears whenever one does not «toe» the atheist line of no god... It has been said over and over here, «there is no proof of your God» ad nauseum I might add... OK... please, I am asking you in the nicest possible way... explain to me, without a Designed, where the universe and all it entails, first got its source... I really would like to know... from everything I see, I see beauty, design, tragedy, poetry, poverty, etc.... How did we begin to name or classify any of this... what intelligence gave us our intelligence... I have yet to see an anwer posited as to how it all came about, absent a Designer... I will wait for an answer... How did it ALL get here, and explain the precision and engineering of it all — right down to the last jot of DNA.

I have been asked many times during debates about warfare whether I would use violence to defend myself and could never answer with any certainty that I would, but I knew without a shadow of a doubt that if he made any attempt to harm my son he would find himself on the receiving end of the Greater Clawed Maltese Falcon.

They are critical questions about our own existence that can hardly be asked, let alone answered, without knowing the theological context in which they first were formulated.

A quick about Abba Pambo — a contemporary of Origen: «If we asked [him] for a word from scripture or some other thing, he would not give us an answer right away but would say, «I haven't figured out the meaning of this word yet»... It normally happened that he spent two or three whole days, or a whole week without giving us an answer saying «if I do not know what sort of fruit this will bear, whether it is a fruit of death or life, I will not speak.»»

How irresponsible is that for an all - knowing, all - powerful «god» to give everyone the «only correct answer» after countless generations have already perished without a chance.

Hartshorne, I think, can not answer such questions and admits as much in a statement, which, though parenthetical to the prior statements I have cited, indicates just how far we are from an analytically clear understanding of divine knowledge: «If this [knowing fear without being afraid] is a paradox so is any idea of adequate knowledge» (CSPM 263).

And Yahweh is jewish terminology is the same now that mean Allah and Yahweh are the same being but christian god is unknown I don't know what he is, And Muhammad in the Qur» an is the last of all Prophets and Messengers and is known as Rehmat ul alimeen the mercy of the world he forgive his most bitterest enemies who tortured him and his followers for believing in one true God.Now Muhammad never try to fake a miracle, the pig is forbidden to eat even in the jewish testament and so even here bible agrees but I don't know why christians eat pork.Secondly wine was forbidden because Muhammad's companions saw the evil in it.So please don't speak without having proper knowledge or Blurting out made up stories that actually have no sense, the jews call Jesus the false prophet, Sorcerer, Necromancer etc would you beieve those stories or be angry.Surely we both know the answer

Asking questions such as how they know what they know and if they can really know anything, fall without answer.

We call this process experimental, which basically means that we don't know the answer with certainty at the beginning (nor can we simply accept an answer on authority without testing it), but only when the experiment is over.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

Jeremy have been asking the holy spirit for his help with this and in regards to the lame man that Jesus healed I do nt believe that sin was the issue for him just like the blind man was it his parents or did he sin the answer was neither but so that God would be glorified.What was the sin that may have been worse for him.The two situations are related of the woman caught in adultery the key words being go and sin no more only two references in the bible and will explain later the lame man we see at first his dependency on everyone else for his needs he cant do it he is in the best position to receive Gods grace but what does he do with it.Does he follow Jesus no we are told he goes to the temple and Jesus finds him now that he has his strength to do things on his own what his response to follow the way of the pharisees that is what is worse than his condition before so he is warned by go and sin no more.We get confused because we see the word sin but the giver of is speaking to him to go another way means death.Getting back to the two situations of the woman caught in adultery and the lame man here we see a picture of our hearts on the one our love for sin and on the other the desire to work out our salvation on our terms they are the two areas we have to submit to God.My experience was the self righteousness was the harder to deal with because it is linked in to our feelings of self worth and self confidence so we have to be broken so we are humble enough to realise that without God we can do nothing our flesh hates that so it is a struggle at first to change our way of thinking.brentnz

Because, knowing that nobody knows the answer to the facts of this life, at least we have the free will to think whatever we want, without fear, but always trying to be logic and common sensed.

Your husband will answer to God, and you must answer to God for how you respond to your husband, even when he causes you to suffer.Just as we are to obey government in every ordinance, and servants are to obey their masters, even the ones who are abusive and surly, «likewise, ye wives, be in subjection to your own husbands»... You can freely call your husband «lord» when you know that you are addressing the one who put him in charge and asked you to suffer at your husband's hands just as our Lord suffered at the hands of unjust authorities... When you endure evil and railing without returning it, you receive a blessing, not just as a martyr, but as one who worships God.»

Neesha — As you just answered Rbnlegnd101; if you lived in another country and died without knowing «Hova, where does their soul go?

If the answer is no, Joplin is willing to give more, without any limits.

But when my questions evolved into the kind without easy answers, Dad refused to respond with empty platitudes or weak apologetics, and instead simply took my hand, walked with me through all the pain and anger and fear that accompanies religious doubt, and said, «I don't know, Rachel.

Don't answer that because we all know why: ancient fossil priests can't get it up without viagra and the like to have roll with alter boys.

Philosopher when you theorise that God created sin that path will take you to a place of unbelief and a mistrust in God as it is a place of doubt and unbelief if you see God as evil.That is one path everyone is free to take.The scriptures say that without faith it is impossible to please God.The other path is that we believe that the bible is true that God is holy and righteous and sin does not dwell him.Ultimately if we believe and trust him then we shall be saved.What does your theory offer is there hope or is there eternal life in your belief the answer is no because unless we believe in Jesus we shall not be saved and eternity is a long time if you are wrong.brentnz

It seems to me asking questions at least challenges people to think about what they believe without playing into the false idol of certainty that you know the answers.

Then Job answered the Lord: «I know that thou canst do all things, and that no purpose of thine can be thwarted, «Who is this that hides counsel without knowledge?»

So, you don't know the answer, yet without any actual «proof» either way, Creationism is is wrong just because?

When the answer to these questions is no, it's like driving your car for six years without an oil change.

I know what it feels to be hopeless, dying, and without answers.

I really can't give you a more definitive answer without trying it myself, gluten - free baking is tricky and you never know what substituting will do.

Your answer is likely there, but it's not possible for me to really guess without knowing more.

Without knowing why your substituting the cream cheese, though, it's hard to give you an answer to what you should use instead.

Even in advanced you can substitute values without solving and get the right answer, you just need to know the manipulations required to do that which only happen if you know the core concepts.