Sentences with phrase «without knowing the state»

But without knowing the state's minimum coverage levels for car insurance, you could be exposed to more calamity than you bargained for.

Not exact matches

Last Friday's enormous cyber attack that brought down popular websites and online services like Amazon (amzn) and Netflix (nflx) was likely caused by a non-state actor, otherwise known as hackers without ties to any specific state or government.

This approach recognizes that Americans have an equal right to clean air and water, no matter where they live, and allows states to compete for business without having to sacrifice public health or environmental quality.

I think states and cities should not bend over backwards without knowing what it means,» said Plotch, before making an analogy to a Simpsons episode in which a traveling salesman convinces Springfield residents to construct a faulty and unnecessary monorail while basic city needs are ignored.

That state of affairs exists, so it's no surprise that criminals can make money off other people's devices and energy, without them even knowing it.

Water Corporation will no longer hand over Dunsborough water and Busselton drainage assets to Busselton Water after the state government deemed the proposal too costly and without benefit.

President Trump boasted in a fundraising speech Wednesday that he made up information in a meeting with the leader of a top U.S. ally, saying he insisted to Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau that the United States runs a trade deficit with its neighbor to the north without knowing whether that was true.

Most Canadians know of Arar's national profile: During a 2002 layover in New York, the United States detained him without charge and extradited Arar to Syria, where he was tortured and held for nearly a year.

Let your customers know that they can contact you from anywhere in the United States without incurring long distance charges with an 800 - number.

The only one without a mythology is the person who states I don't know.

That is inconsiderate at best and potentially cruel depending on the emotional state of the person you are judging without really knowing.

4 It is significant that in Whitehead's Metaphysics Leclerc has stated, without textual support from Whitehead, that for Whitehead past entities do not «exist in the full sense of «exist», and... are no longer properly «actual» (p. 109).

Three countries create a no - fly zone in Iraq, without the slightest consultation with the United Nations (the United States, France and the UK)».

When one reads the many critics who discuss Camus» «atheism,» or his «new humanism,» or his Lack of «eternal values,» or even Camus» own attacks upon the Christian God, it is astonishing to read what he states to be his «rebel's» true intention: «He is seeking, without knowing it, morality or the sacred.

Naaman can now be what he is, not without questions and repentance, but whole and entire, a man who is no longer gnawed away by leprosy physically, a man who, resting in the peace of God, ceases to be gnawed away by the idolatry of the state which divides and corrupts the innermost depths of man.

Simply stated without a long thesis... we don't know «HOW» the big bang happened... there is nothing to suggest the question «who» was behind it.

i did nt have to read very far into it to realise it was bogus but found it sort of amusing but it did however get the point through that nobody will ever know the exact time or in whos generation jesus will return but as clearly stated he will without any doubt return!!!!

We are faced with a choice between stating: (1) God only knows in general and abstractly what the world is, or (2) God knows the world intimately and subjectively; feeling without remainder the feelings of others.

Whitehead states the wrong: «Mr. Russell, a scholar known in every major university of the world, impelled by motives which religion dare not disown, has been driven out of academic life and deprived of academic encouragement...» Whitehead «leave [s] the question here,» without drawing the conclusion explicitly: restore the lectureship to rectify the wrong.

Without having willed it, without knowing why, we find ourselves engaged in a world which seems to be laboriously raising itself to a state of ever greater organic compWithout having willed it, without knowing why, we find ourselves engaged in a world which seems to be laboriously raising itself to a state of ever greater organic compwithout knowing why, we find ourselves engaged in a world which seems to be laboriously raising itself to a state of ever greater organic complexity.

But that freedom is just one of many that we enjoy in the United States — and religious tolerance is no more, or less, valuable than are rights to free speech, to bear arms, to be free from search and seizure, to be presumed innocent until proven otherwise, to be tried by our peers, to have our day in court, to not be imprisoned or fined without cause, to ensure State's rights, to be free from slavery and involuntary servitude, and on, and on, and on.

ME II, Yes and no, this is what Henry Davis is referring to when he says «higher law of conscience» or Romans 1 states «For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse...»

Considering that there is actually no evidence for God (which is why in the first place you have faith...), and hopefully you all do know the definition of faith — Believing in something without evidence, already states that there isn't evidence for God... no going back to Atheism.

The «Father» of the Nation, being the United States of America is quoted saying; «The General is sorry to be informed — , that the foolish and wicked practice of profane cursing and swearing, a vice heretofore little known in an American army, is growing into a fashion; — he hopes the officers will, by example as well as influence, endeavor to check it, and that both they and the men will reflect that we can have little hope of the blessing of Heaven on our arms, if we insult it by impiety and folly; added to this, it is a vice so mean and low, without any temptation, that every man of sense and character detests and despises it.»

The state knows something of mercy; for no civilized penal code is without its gesture toward the possible restoration of the wrongdoer to society.

The Apostle Paul» stated very clearly that those who do not accept his gospel «are without excuse for what can be known about God is plain to them, because God has shown it to them» (Rom.

Without the Sunnah, these texts would have been incomprehensible, stating as known things which were not known.

Agents of the state can teach your children how to have sex, give them condoms, put them on the pill, give them the morning - after pill if it doesn't work, and take them off for an abortion if that fails - and all without you having any say in the matter or necessarily even knowing about it.

but i didn't state anything example — i stated that the theory of evolution is yet to be proved and so with that i agree that due to that lacking it is equal to the theory of god... the only thing i said which is cemented truth for anything is that we don't know what the real answer is... and by stating ideas as facts serves no real purpose but a selfish one... lets call it an ease - ment on the inner self, the mind can now be at peace with the hope that when i die i get to live yet again... full belief in this is insane without evidence.

No so called God ever invented air - condition or computers or the combustion engine without which there wouldn't be any money in the Gulf States.

Reflecting, even briefly, on the state of affairs which might evoke this universal love in the human heart, a love so often vainly dreamed of, but which now leaves the fields of Utopia to reveal itself as both possible and necessary, we are brought to the following conclusion: that for men upon earth, all the earth, to learn to love one another, it is not enough that they should know themselves to be members of one and the same thing; in «planetizing» themselves they must acquire the consciousness, without losing themselves, of becoming one and the same person.

While an atheist states that God is a myth without knowing.

If explaining a state of affairs consists in substituting for a lesser known object ones which are more accessible and familiar, and in then explaining them, the objects of knowledge can be discriminated by the extent to which they lend themselves to this rule of explanation.7 That is, they can be discriminated by the extent to which explaining them can be meaningfully replaced by explaining something else without thereby explaining away just what was to be explained.

Instead we are taken on a gentle tour of three arguments put forward for atheism:» [T] hat conflicts fought in the name of religion are always about religion; that it is ultimately possible to know with confidence what is right and what is wrong without acknowledging the existence of God; and that atheist states are not actually atheist.»

The writer links 1Cor14: 34 with other texts without even knowing what they say (eg: Paul did NOT state that women should wear head coverings (v5 etc etc)-- if you read a LITTLE further down to Verse 15 he confirms that «head covering» refers to a woman's hair — and (original Greek translation) he does even not state whether it is long or short, just that she should not shave her head.

And yet, without trying to appear jaundiced or anything like that, I no longer think that it will ever be likely as long as the United States is number one, as long as we're exploiting the world to the degree that we are.

= > no, you and your offspring can not be president of the United States without being liars.

Italy could not be unified without that large block of territories in the center of the peninsula known as the Papal States, and given its hostility to the nature of the new regime and the continued assertion of temporal sovereignty it would not relinquish for decades, the papacy would not accept the legitimacy of the new state.

Among them were pantheism and the positions that human reason is the sole arbiter of truth and falsehood and good and evil; that Christian faith contradicts reason; that Christ is a myth; that philosophy must be treated without reference to supernatural revelation; that every man is free to embrace the religion which, guided by the light of reason, he believes to be true; that Protestantism is another form of the Christian religion in which it is possible to be as pleasing to God as in the Catholic Church; that the civil power can determine the limits within which the Catholic Church may exercise authority; that Roman Pontiffs and Ecumenical Councils have erred in defining matters of faith and morals; that the Church does not have direct or indirect temporal power or the right to invoke force; that in a conflict between Church and State the civil law should prevail; that the civil power has the right to appoint and depose bishops; that the entire direction of public schools in which the youth of Christian states are educated must be by the civil power; that the Church should be separated from the State and the State from the Church; that moral laws do not need divine sanction; that it is permissible to rebel against legitimate princes; that a civil contract may among Christians constitute true marriage; that the Catholic religion should no longer be the religion of the State to the exclusion of all other forms of worship; and «that the Roman Pontiff can and should reconcile himself to and agree with progress, liberalism and modern civilization.»

The proposed content fitted exactly with Luther's own views and his own understanding of the situation, so he duly wrote it, giving his reasons for returning and stating specifically: «I know that my coming to reside in Your Electoral Grace's city is without Your Electoral Grace's knowledge or consent» and saying that he realised the danger for the Elector and for himself «banned and condemned by papal and Imperial law as I am, and expecting death at any moment».

I'm curious if you can state it without using the Pauline «descriptors»... here's a quote from a well known Christian that illustrates what I mean,

Considering the substantial amoutn of witness throughout history concerning miracles, both from those within christianity and without, to state as fact they do nt exist is.I do nt know... I do nt agree with that.

Sin is the state of being a signifier without a signified, an agency with no inborn direction, a secondary thing no longer connected with that which would give it meaning, an entity severed from the ground of its being and therefore wholly empty.

The programme therefore had to be dressed up with the strong affirmation of great words: speeches on «open society, the sign of equality automatically placed between Market and Democracy, the elegy of the so - called deregulation which had come to be the synonym of liberty (without clarifying whose), the anti-state speeches, the state which was considered to be the obvious synonym of bureaucrats, autocrats and idiots, no longer the possible instrument of the management of historic social compromises, founded on democracy.

Someone on the internetz ALWAYS has to have that ONE know - it - all, or odd comment I guess their life is not complete without it being stated...

Would appreciate knowing how many of the Tiger Nuts one can eat daily... without getting intestinal problems, stated on some U-Tube videos that come when eating «too many»!

The truth doesn't set you free on Justarsenal lol, you'll state a known fact that Giroud went 15 games without scoring a single goal for Arsenal then someone will use his form France as an argument about his credentials as if his goals for France will somehow contribute to Arsenal winning titles!

its rubbish that we can survive or more outrageously as claimed by said Ozil today, win anything without these players coming in Don't boast of a 100» 000 war chest and then quibble over pennies for a player we don't at this point know anything about and as I've stated before may or may not be a great player in the next three or four seasons, (makes you think is beilik an investment for resale to make more money?)

Time for some brutal honesty... this team, as it stands, is in no better position to compete next season than they were 12 months ago, minus the fact that some fans have been easily snowed by the acquisition of Lacazette, the free transfer LB and the release of Sanogo... if you look at the facts carefully you will see a team that still has far more questions than answers... to better show what I mean by this statement I will briefly discuss the current state of affairs on a position - by - position basis... in goal we have 4 potential candidates, but in reality we have only 1 option with any real future and somehow he's the only one we have actively tried to get rid of for years because he and his father were a little too involved on social media and he got caught smoking (funny how people still defend Wiltshire under the same and far worse circumstances)... you would think we would want to keep any goaltender that Juventus had interest in, as they seem to have a pretty good history when it comes to that position... as far as the defenders on our current roster there are only a few individuals whom have the skill and / or youth worthy of our time and / or investment, as such we should get rid of anyone who doesn't meet those simple requirements, which means we should get rid of DeBouchy, Gibbs, Gabriel, Mertz and loan out Chambers to see if last seasons foray with Middlesborough was an anomaly or a prediction of things to come... some fans have lamented wildly about the return of Mertz to the starting lineup due to his FA Cup performance but these sort of pie in the sky meanderings are indicative of what's wrong with this club and it's wishy - washy fan - base... in addition to these moves the club should aggressively pursue the acquisition of dominant and mobile CB to stabilize an all too fragile defensive group that has self - destructed on numerous occasions over the past 5 seasons... moving forward and building on our need to re-establish our once dominant presence throughout the middle of the park we need to target a CDM then do whatever it takes to get that player into the fold without any of the usual nickel and diming we have become famous for (this kind of ruthless haggling has cost us numerous special players and certainly can't help make the player in question feel good about the way their future potential employer feels about them)... in order for us to become dominant again we need to be strong up the middle again from Goalkeeper to CB to DM to ACM to striker, like we did in our most glorious years before and during Wenger's reign... with this in mind, if we want Ozil to be that dominant attacking midfielder we can't keep leaving him exposed to constant ridicule about his lack of defensive prowess and provide him with the proper players in the final third... he was never a good defensive player in Real or with the German National squad and they certainly didn't suffer as a result of his presence on the pitch... as for the rest of the midfield the blame falls squarely in the hands of Wenger and Gazidis, the fact that Ramsey, Ox, Sanchez and even Ozil were allowed to regularly start when none of the aforementioned had more than a year left under contract is criminal for a club of this size and financial might... the fact that we could find money for Walcott and Xhaka, who weren't even guaranteed starters, means that our whole business model needs a complete overhaul... for me it's time to get rid of some serious deadweight, even if it means selling them below what you believe their market value is just to simply right this ship and change the stagnant culture that currently exists... this means saying goodbye to Wiltshire, Elneny, Carzola, Walcott and Ramsey... everyone, minus Elneny, have spent just as much time on the training table as on the field of play, which would be manageable if they weren't so inconsistent from a performance standpoint (excluding Carzola, who is like the recent version of Rosicky — too bad, both will be deeply missed)... in their places we need to bring in some proven performers with no history of injuries... up front, although I do like the possibilities that a player like Lacazette presents, the fact that we had to wait so many years to acquire some true quality at the striker position falls once again squarely at the feet of Wenger... this issue highlights the ultimate scam being perpetrated by this club since the arrival of Kroenke: pretend your a small market club when it comes to making purchases but milk your fans like a big market club when it comes to ticket prices and merchandising... I believe the reason why Wenger hasn't pursued someone of Henry's quality, minus a fairly inexpensive RVP, was that he knew that they would demand players of a similar ilk to be brought on board and that wasn't possible when the business model was that of a «selling» club... does it really make sense that we could only make a cheeky bid for Suarez, or that we couldn't get Higuain over the line when he was being offered up for half the price he eventually went to Juve for, or that we've only paid any interest to strikers who were clearly not going to press their current teams to let them go to Arsenal like Benzema or Cavani... just part of the facade that finally came crashing down when Sanchez finally called their bluff... the fact remains that no one wants to win more than Sanchez, including Wenger, and although I don't agree with everything that he has done off the field, I would much rather have Alexis front and center than a manager who has clearly bought into the Kroenke model in large part due to the fact that his enormous ego suggests that only he could accomplish great things without breaking the bank... unfortunately that isn't possible anymore as the game has changed quite dramatically in the last 15 years, which has left a largely complacent and complicit Wenger on the outside looking in... so don't blame those players who demanded more and were left wanting... don't blame those fans who have tried desperately to raise awareness for several years when cracks began to appear... place the blame at the feet of those who were well aware all along of the potential pitfalls of just such a plan but continued to follow it even when it was no longer a financial necessity, like it ever really was...

The 37 - year - old Pirlo has never learned English and can barely understand it either, but since moving to the United States and playing a staring role for the upstart MLS side, it has probably become harder and harder for him to go without knowing it — not to mention the missed endorsement opportunities in the advertising capital of the world.