Sentences with phrase «without knowing what»

Civilians want to live the cozy life, without knowing what the details of what the honorable countrymen do, in order for that cozy life to exist.

Without knowing what (the size of that territory is) and how (much he improved market share), what is «exceedingly high?»»

One of the problems with the contemporary workplace is that many people take a new job without knowing what it really involves, who they will be working with, or what the company's culture is.

They say this is the first «proper» smartwatch that Fitbit will ever offer - without knowing what'll be inside, of course.

This is a commonly - used option that's tucked away neatly under Android's Developer Options menu, but it's still something that many users enable without giving it a second thought — and without knowing what it really does.

The mistake that Microsoft or Apple or Google can make involves thinking of an assistant as a entity that can help users without knowing what the user is doing, Soltero said.

In the same way that many people throw around the acronym «NASDAQ» without knowing that it stands for the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation, we who keep our fingers on the pulse of the tech world often discuss IP ratings without knowing what the «IP» stands for:

In the same way that many people throw around the acronym «NASDAQ» without knowing that it stands for the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation, we who keep our fingers on the pulse of the tech world often discuss IP ratings without knowing what the «IP» stands for: ingress protection.

The answer to your question can not be answered without knowing what State you live in.

If you buy a non-guaranteed policy without knowing what it is or how it works, you are subjecting yourself to potential heartache down the road.

... most people's circumstances have changed greatly over the course of 40 years and it is impossible to say what you should do without knowing what your goals are.

Without knowing what you want to achieve by buying life insurance, we'll never know how to best serve you!

Without knowing what criteria matter, most candidates have no idea how to classify themselves.

Please call me directly at 877-443-9467 for a quote, as I can not quote you without knowing what state you are in.

Without knowing what your income and outgo look like each month, it's impossible to successfully set aside savings for things like retirement, your kids» college funds, that boat you want.

Cash Cow Couple is very straightforward and simple, but also brings with it personal experience, which adds authenticity, and authority; Jacob passed the CFP exam, so you know the couple isn't just spouting things without knowing what they're talking about.

Do you buy a car without knowing what type of car it is?

So, pricing such covers will become difficult, without knowing what group he belongs to,» he said.

Society president Andrew Holroyd says: «It is wholly wrong that the profession should be asked to sign up to the transitional scheme without knowing what the end - game is.»

In advising a client inclined to take a bad risk, the lawyer can't really change that perception without knowing what's causing it.

Often times, the consent is meaningless because we check a box without knowing what it means, or just to get rid of the message.

Superior Court original civil jurisdiction (i.e. opposed to appellate or criminal jurisdiction), other than territorial jurisdiction (I am assuming that Boston is actually the right location for your claim without knowing what it is for sake of argument) is as follows:

If one accepts this definition, then it is clear that without knowing what the perceived value is, there is no way to use it as the primary influence in the setting of that price.

I suspect that this correspondent, in his rush to find a suitable synonym for liberalisation used the deregulation without knowing what it meant

Moreover, she could not sue without knowing what those reasons are.

«The reasons include fear of the black box, or perhaps a reluctance to pay additional fees for this premium service without knowing what the results will be.

If you're giving out legal advice without knowing what happened, you've got a whole host of problems.

This makes sense; who would want to risk a move without knowing what they're getting into?

But without knowing what the actual outcome would be had the case gone to trial, a fee request of $ 11,000 is difficult to justify.

Similarly, why should the client allow the lawyer to proceed without knowing what was being done?

It turns out to be quite easy to do a simple but fairly robust reality check of global warming forecasts, even without knowing what a «Watt» or a «forcing» is.

Without knowing what «normal» is that is all you can do.

Everyone who comes up with a statistical analysis of this sort is essentially trying to reach a conclusion as to how much warming was natural variation and how much wasn't, without knowing what the natural variation actually is!

The problem is it might take a thousand years to balance the ENSO books and without knowing what drives the change in trade winds that drives the change in Pacific SST we can't say with high confidence it's a wash or how long it must be averaged to become a wash.

But brunch may just seem like a nice brunch, if you come and eat without knowing what goes on behind the scenes.

Yet modern science claims that we can not predict climate without knowing what causes climate.

Without knowing what you are comparing to what, you can get different interpretations of climate and primary forcings.

SoD: «If we take a 10um layer and work out energy changes and therefore temperature changes we can do it without knowing what R1 is.

Based on that alone without knowing what other differences in that period contributed it is apparently possible 100 % of the increase is not due to man.

If we take a 10um layer and work out energy changes and therefore temperature changes we can do it without knowing what R1 is.

DAvid, «How could anyone have done so, without knowing what ENSOs (especially) would happen in the next 15 - 20 years, the volcanic eruptions, changes in solar variability, etc?»

How could anyone have done so, without knowing what ENSOs (especially) would happen in the next 15 - 20 years, the volcanic eruptions, changes in solar variability, etc?

David Appell: How could anyone have done so, without knowing what ENSOs (especially) would happen in the next 15 - 20 years, the volcanic eruptions, changes in solar variability, etc?

If the oscillations aren't real there are errors in the physics of the models and, without knowing what these errors are, there is no way of knowing if the errors are amplified or dampened by the addition of forcing calculations.

@sr: They are going to look really silly if they have been claiming the internal variability of the models as GHG forced warming without knowing what they were looking at, don't you agree?

It is meaningless without knowing what is happening in the savings account, not to mention the stock portfolios and retirement accounts you may not even know about.

«Man didn't use it for all those hundreds and hundreds of years without knowing what they were doing.»

In general, the consensus view is squat, the estimated «sensitivity» is reducing because without knowing what «normal» is you can't determine abnormal.

Removing a «trend» after it has been detrended without knowing what response times may be applicable is mathturbation.

I for one am curious about the details of this because it is impossible to judge it without knowing what it's all about.