With climate projections showing a trend to higher average and higher extreme temperatures across the West, it's likely that any drought will be more severe than it would have been
without manmade warming, the study — along with others — warns.
Not exact matches
However, readers of my column will know that I give contrarians, or sceptics, or deniers (call them what you will) short shrift, and as a close follower of the scientific debate on this subject I can state
without doubt that there is no dispute whatsoever within the expert community as to the reality or causes of
manmade global
warming.
As for lying, I have observed many scientists seem to have no difficulty with lying when they connect,
without a shred of evidence, supportive modeling or any data or often even any theory such things as extreme weather is getting worse or is linked to CO2, wet areas will get wetter and dry areas will get drier, that the ocean swallowed the «missing heat», using a proxy upside down doesn't matter, the models are still adequate for policy even after such a huge divergence from reality, coral die - back is due to
manmade warming rather than fishing, all
warming must be bad rather than beyond a certain threshold, etc, etc, etc..
Guests were included as «doubters» if they cast doubt on whether the majority of recent
warming is
manmade, self - identify as a «skeptic,» or stated that the benefits of
warming would outweigh the costs
without explicitly mentioning that at some point the costs would outweigh any benefits.